Value relevance of general government national accounts with ESA2010 accrual accounting framework. Association of ESA2010 reporting quality with decision making and accounting standardisation

Michalis Bekiaris, Antonia Markogiannopoulou
{"title":"Value relevance of general government national accounts with ESA2010 accrual accounting framework. Association of ESA2010 reporting quality with decision making and accounting standardisation","authors":"Michalis Bekiaris, Antonia Markogiannopoulou","doi":"10.24818/jamis.2022.04005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The necessity for a reliable set of international standards for the compilation of national accounts introduced the accrual accounting framework of the European System of Accounts (ESA 2010). Extensive efforts are made for convergence between Government Accounts (GA) and National Accounts (NA) under accounting standards. Design/methodology/approach: This study investigated the quality of governmental NA, in the context of ESA 2010, from 1999 through 2019, using relative value relevance models of long-term government bond yields. Findings: i) The accrual accounting framework ESA2010 generates value relevant (thus qualitative) NA financial reporting in EU member states and the United Kingdom (UK); ii) The financial variables that better interpret bonds’ return, thus governments’ necessity to borrow money, are showcased; iii) The usefulness of the ESA2010 conceptual framework for decision and policy making process considering that the accrual accounting basis fosters the financial reporting quality, is demonstrated; iv) The quality results set the premise for further discussion for the harmonization and alignment process of accounting standardisation with the ESA2010 accrual accounting framework as a resource for policy and decision making. Limitations: The methodology of value relevance models that is employed to assess the governmental statistical reporting quality with the ESA2010 accrual accounting framework is a private sector technique. Originality: This study contributes theoretically as it fosters the quality of accrual accounting basis. It moreover provides an empirical and practical contribution by introducing relative value relevance econometric models that provide stakeholders with reliable information on the financial position and performance of the government. It showcases significant financial variables and coefficients of statistical reporting for each government. With its value relevant results, it supports evidence-based decision making, allows comparisons between EU governments and the UK, and contributes to increased transparency and accountability.","PeriodicalId":14716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2022.04005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The necessity for a reliable set of international standards for the compilation of national accounts introduced the accrual accounting framework of the European System of Accounts (ESA 2010). Extensive efforts are made for convergence between Government Accounts (GA) and National Accounts (NA) under accounting standards. Design/methodology/approach: This study investigated the quality of governmental NA, in the context of ESA 2010, from 1999 through 2019, using relative value relevance models of long-term government bond yields. Findings: i) The accrual accounting framework ESA2010 generates value relevant (thus qualitative) NA financial reporting in EU member states and the United Kingdom (UK); ii) The financial variables that better interpret bonds’ return, thus governments’ necessity to borrow money, are showcased; iii) The usefulness of the ESA2010 conceptual framework for decision and policy making process considering that the accrual accounting basis fosters the financial reporting quality, is demonstrated; iv) The quality results set the premise for further discussion for the harmonization and alignment process of accounting standardisation with the ESA2010 accrual accounting framework as a resource for policy and decision making. Limitations: The methodology of value relevance models that is employed to assess the governmental statistical reporting quality with the ESA2010 accrual accounting framework is a private sector technique. Originality: This study contributes theoretically as it fosters the quality of accrual accounting basis. It moreover provides an empirical and practical contribution by introducing relative value relevance econometric models that provide stakeholders with reliable information on the financial position and performance of the government. It showcases significant financial variables and coefficients of statistical reporting for each government. With its value relevant results, it supports evidence-based decision making, allows comparisons between EU governments and the UK, and contributes to increased transparency and accountability.
一般政府国民账户与ESA2010权责发生制会计框架的价值相关性。ESA2010报告质量与决策和会计标准化协会
目的:为编制国民核算需要一套可靠的国际标准,引入了权责发生制会计框架的欧洲核算体系(ESA 2010)。在会计准则下,政府帐户(GA)和国民帐户(NA)之间的趋同作出了广泛的努力。设计/方法/方法:本研究使用长期政府债券收益率的相对价值相关模型,在ESA 2010的背景下,从1999年到2019年调查了政府NA的质量。发现:i)权责发生制会计框架ESA2010在欧盟成员国和英国产生了价值相关(因此是定性的)NA财务报告;ii)展示了更好地解释债券回报的金融变量,从而展示了政府借款的必要性;iii)考虑到权责发生制会计基础促进了财务报告质量,ESA2010概念框架对决策和政策制定过程的有用性得到了证明;iv)质量结果为进一步讨论会计标准化与ESA2010权责发生制会计框架作为政策和决策资源的协调和校准过程奠定了前提。局限性:价值相关模型的方法被用来评估政府统计报告质量与ESA2010权责发生制会计框架是一种私营部门的技术。原创性:本研究在促进权责发生制会计基础质量方面具有理论贡献。此外,它还通过引入相对价值相关性计量经济模型,为利益相关者提供有关政府财务状况和绩效的可靠信息,从而提供了经验和实践贡献。它展示了每个政府统计报告的显著财务变量和系数。凭借其价值相关的结果,它支持基于证据的决策,允许欧盟政府和英国之间的比较,并有助于提高透明度和问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信