The Discrepancy Between Subjective and Objective Findings After Septoplasty

Šekib Umihanić, F. Brkić, M. Osmić, Šefika Umihanić, Suad Imamovic, S. Kamenjaković, Samir Hodžić
{"title":"The Discrepancy Between Subjective and Objective Findings After Septoplasty","authors":"Šekib Umihanić, F. Brkić, M. Osmić, Šefika Umihanić, Suad Imamovic, S. Kamenjaković, Samir Hodžić","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2016.70.336-338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical and medical treatments of nasal obstruction are a common parts of otolaryngologist practice. The definitive treatment of deviated nasal septum is septoplasty. Aim: In this study was to evaluate the values of subjective parameters, and active anterior rhinomanometry parameters prior and three months after the septoplasty. Patients and Methods: We analyzed the subjective parameters (“NOSE” scale), the active anterior rhinomanometry parameters according to International Committee on Standardization of Rhinomanometry, on 40 patients. Thirty healthy adult volunteers participated belonged to the control group. None of the patients or healthy volunteers had previous history of nasal surgery or active rhinological disease. Results: The post-operative improvement in symptoms of nasal obstruction obtained in 92,5% patients and improvement parameters of the active anterior rhinomanometry in 42,5% patients. Conclusion: The correlation between the findings with rhinomanometry and subjective sensation of nasal patency remains uncertain. There still seems to be only a limited argument for the use of rhinomanometry for quantifying surgical results. Three months postoperative findings are very early results to interpret the permanent effects.","PeriodicalId":18414,"journal":{"name":"Medical Archives","volume":"140 1","pages":"336 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.336-338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical and medical treatments of nasal obstruction are a common parts of otolaryngologist practice. The definitive treatment of deviated nasal septum is septoplasty. Aim: In this study was to evaluate the values of subjective parameters, and active anterior rhinomanometry parameters prior and three months after the septoplasty. Patients and Methods: We analyzed the subjective parameters (“NOSE” scale), the active anterior rhinomanometry parameters according to International Committee on Standardization of Rhinomanometry, on 40 patients. Thirty healthy adult volunteers participated belonged to the control group. None of the patients or healthy volunteers had previous history of nasal surgery or active rhinological disease. Results: The post-operative improvement in symptoms of nasal obstruction obtained in 92,5% patients and improvement parameters of the active anterior rhinomanometry in 42,5% patients. Conclusion: The correlation between the findings with rhinomanometry and subjective sensation of nasal patency remains uncertain. There still seems to be only a limited argument for the use of rhinomanometry for quantifying surgical results. Three months postoperative findings are very early results to interpret the permanent effects.
鼻中隔成形术后主客观结果的差异
鼻塞的外科和内科治疗是耳鼻喉科医生的常见做法。鼻中隔偏曲的最终治疗方法是鼻中隔成形术。目的:评价鼻中隔成形术前后三个月主观参数和主动前鼻测压参数的值。患者与方法:对40例患者的主观参数(“NOSE”量表)和根据国际鼻测量标准化委员会的主动前鼻测量参数进行分析。30名健康成人志愿者作为对照组。所有患者和健康志愿者均无鼻手术史或活动性鼻疾病。结果:92.5%的患者术后鼻塞症状得到改善,42.5%的患者术后鼻前测量指标得到改善。结论:鼻压测量结果与鼻通畅主观感觉之间的相关性尚不明确。对于使用鼻测术来量化手术结果,似乎仍然只有有限的争论。术后三个月的结果是解释永久性影响的早期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信