Investigating the Relationship Between Emotion Recognition Software and Usability Metrics

Q1 Social Sciences
i-com Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1515/icom-2020-0009
Thomas Schmidt, Miriam Schlindwein, Katharina Lichtner, Christian Wolff
{"title":"Investigating the Relationship Between Emotion Recognition Software and Usability Metrics","authors":"Thomas Schmidt, Miriam Schlindwein, Katharina Lichtner, Christian Wolff","doi":"10.1515/icom-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Due to progress in affective computing, various forms of general purpose sentiment/emotion recognition software have become available. However, the application of such tools in usability engineering (UE) for measuring the emotional state of participants is rarely employed. We investigate if the application of sentiment/emotion recognition software is beneficial for gathering objective and intuitive data that can predict usability similar to traditional usability metrics. We present the results of a UE project examining this question for the three modalities text, speech and face. We perform a large scale usability test (N = 125) with a counterbalanced within-subject design with two websites of varying usability. We have identified a weak but significant correlation between text-based sentiment analysis on the text acquired via thinking aloud and SUS scores as well as a weak positive correlation between the proportion of neutrality in users’ voice and SUS scores. However, for the majority of the output of emotion recognition software, we could not find any significant results. Emotion metrics could not be used to successfully differentiate between two websites of varying usability. Regression models, either unimodal or multimodal could not predict usability metrics. We discuss reasons for these results and how to continue research with more sophisticated methods.","PeriodicalId":37105,"journal":{"name":"i-com","volume":"17 1","pages":"139 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-com","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Due to progress in affective computing, various forms of general purpose sentiment/emotion recognition software have become available. However, the application of such tools in usability engineering (UE) for measuring the emotional state of participants is rarely employed. We investigate if the application of sentiment/emotion recognition software is beneficial for gathering objective and intuitive data that can predict usability similar to traditional usability metrics. We present the results of a UE project examining this question for the three modalities text, speech and face. We perform a large scale usability test (N = 125) with a counterbalanced within-subject design with two websites of varying usability. We have identified a weak but significant correlation between text-based sentiment analysis on the text acquired via thinking aloud and SUS scores as well as a weak positive correlation between the proportion of neutrality in users’ voice and SUS scores. However, for the majority of the output of emotion recognition software, we could not find any significant results. Emotion metrics could not be used to successfully differentiate between two websites of varying usability. Regression models, either unimodal or multimodal could not predict usability metrics. We discuss reasons for these results and how to continue research with more sophisticated methods.
情绪识别软件与可用性度量的关系研究
由于情感计算的进步,各种形式的通用情感/情感识别软件已经出现。然而,这些工具在可用性工程(UE)中用于测量参与者的情绪状态的应用很少。我们研究了情感/情感识别软件的应用是否有利于收集客观和直观的数据,这些数据可以像传统的可用性指标一样预测可用性。我们提出了一个UE项目的结果,该项目研究了文本、语音和面部三种模式的这个问题。我们进行了一次大规模的可用性测试(N = 125),在两个不同可用性的网站上进行了主题内平衡设计。我们已经发现,通过大声思考获得的文本的基于文本的情感分析与SUS分数之间存在微弱但显著的相关性,以及用户声音中立性比例与SUS分数之间存在微弱的正相关性。然而,对于大多数情绪识别软件的输出,我们没有发现任何显著的结果。情感指标无法成功区分两个可用性不同的网站。回归模型,无论是单模态还是多模态都不能预测可用性指标。我们讨论了这些结果的原因,以及如何用更复杂的方法继续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
i-com
i-com Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信