{"title":"European and International Perspectives on Benefit-Cost Analysis: Symposium Introduction","authors":"M. Florio","doi":"10.1017/bca.2020.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The idea of assessing the costs and benefits of public and private projects is not new to Europe, dating back to studies at the Ecole des Ponts et Chaussees (Paris) in the XIX century. Later on, in the last century, Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) in its current form has been more extensively used in the United States than in Europe. In the last two decades, however, there has been a rapid increase in its use in a number of European countries and at the European Union (EU) level. European governments often undertake tasks that would be done by private companies in the United States, such as the provision of transport, energy, water and waste management, health services, etc. In the United States the focus of BCA has often been regulatory impact analysis, rather than public project evaluation. One might, therefore, expect that Europeans might approach some things differently from their American counterparts and that new insights might result from these efforts. The articles in this symposium, taken from the recent European Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis (SBCA) conference in Toulouse, illustrate some of these differences and some converging themes.","PeriodicalId":45587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","volume":"17 1","pages":"55 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2020.35","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The idea of assessing the costs and benefits of public and private projects is not new to Europe, dating back to studies at the Ecole des Ponts et Chaussees (Paris) in the XIX century. Later on, in the last century, Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) in its current form has been more extensively used in the United States than in Europe. In the last two decades, however, there has been a rapid increase in its use in a number of European countries and at the European Union (EU) level. European governments often undertake tasks that would be done by private companies in the United States, such as the provision of transport, energy, water and waste management, health services, etc. In the United States the focus of BCA has often been regulatory impact analysis, rather than public project evaluation. One might, therefore, expect that Europeans might approach some things differently from their American counterparts and that new insights might result from these efforts. The articles in this symposium, taken from the recent European Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis (SBCA) conference in Toulouse, illustrate some of these differences and some converging themes.
评估公共和私人项目的成本和收益的想法对欧洲来说并不新鲜,可以追溯到19世纪巴黎高等学校(Ecole des pont et Chaussees)的研究。后来,在上个世纪,效益成本分析(BCA)以其目前的形式在美国比在欧洲得到了更广泛的应用。然而,在过去二十年中,在一些欧洲国家和欧洲联盟(EU)一级,其使用迅速增加。欧洲各国政府经常承担本应由美国私营公司完成的任务,例如提供运输、能源、水和废物管理、卫生服务等。在美国,BCA的重点往往是监管影响分析,而不是公共项目评估。因此,人们可能会期望欧洲人处理某些事情的方式与美国人不同,这些努力可能会产生新的见解。本次研讨会的文章摘自最近在图卢兹举行的欧洲效益-成本分析学会(SBCA)会议,阐述了其中的一些差异和一些共同的主题。