{"title":"Accounting Theory and Accounting Practice as Loosely Coupled Systems: A Historical Perspective on the Italian Case (1930-1990)","authors":"S. Zambon, Laura Girella","doi":"10.3280/FR2016-001006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its crucial role for a practically oriented discipline such as accounting, the relationship between theory and practice in this domain appears to be relatively unexplored, and even more so it is in comparative terms. Adopting a longitudinal approach, the paper aims to investigate this relationship referring to the Italian experience in the period 1930-1990, which is set against the background of a well-known interpretation of the theory-practice interplay proposed for the USA, i.e. the \"market for excuses\" model (Watts and Zimmerman, 1979). In the Italian environment, the relationship between accounting theory and accounting practice shows contents and trajectories which are rather dissimilar from those implied by positive researchers with reference to the American context. In particular, it emerges that in Italy accounting theory, that has an inherent ex ante nature and is encapsulated into a wider institutionally-veined body of knowledge called ‘economia aziendale’, has been in the main detached from practice and operational needs. Thus, Italian theory and practice could be fruitfully described as two loosely coupled systems with occasional and unintended intersections, each of which has its own internal logics and its own \"demand-supply\" dynamics. In this respect, the Watts and Zimmerman’s model denotes a limited explanatory power when applied to contexts - such as the Italian one - presenting socio-economic features, as well as a theoretical tradition, which are distinctively different from the USA.","PeriodicalId":42044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting","volume":"19 1","pages":"95-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/FR2016-001006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Despite its crucial role for a practically oriented discipline such as accounting, the relationship between theory and practice in this domain appears to be relatively unexplored, and even more so it is in comparative terms. Adopting a longitudinal approach, the paper aims to investigate this relationship referring to the Italian experience in the period 1930-1990, which is set against the background of a well-known interpretation of the theory-practice interplay proposed for the USA, i.e. the "market for excuses" model (Watts and Zimmerman, 1979). In the Italian environment, the relationship between accounting theory and accounting practice shows contents and trajectories which are rather dissimilar from those implied by positive researchers with reference to the American context. In particular, it emerges that in Italy accounting theory, that has an inherent ex ante nature and is encapsulated into a wider institutionally-veined body of knowledge called ‘economia aziendale’, has been in the main detached from practice and operational needs. Thus, Italian theory and practice could be fruitfully described as two loosely coupled systems with occasional and unintended intersections, each of which has its own internal logics and its own "demand-supply" dynamics. In this respect, the Watts and Zimmerman’s model denotes a limited explanatory power when applied to contexts - such as the Italian one - presenting socio-economic features, as well as a theoretical tradition, which are distinctively different from the USA.
尽管它对于像会计这样以实践为导向的学科起着至关重要的作用,但这一领域的理论与实践之间的关系似乎相对未被探索,在比较方面更是如此。本文采用纵向研究方法,参照意大利在1930-1990年期间的经验来研究这种关系,其背景是对美国提出的理论-实践相互作用的著名解释,即“借口市场”模型(Watts and Zimmerman, 1979)。在意大利环境中,会计理论与会计实践之间的关系所显示的内容和轨迹与参考美国环境的实证研究者所暗示的内容和轨迹相当不同。特别是,在意大利,会计理论具有固有的事前性质,并被封装到一个更广泛的制度脉络知识体系中,称为“aziendale”,主要脱离了实践和操作需求。因此,意大利的理论和实践可以被描述为两个松散耦合的系统,偶尔会有意想不到的交集,每个系统都有自己的内部逻辑和自己的“需求-供应”动态。在这方面,瓦茨和齐默尔曼的模型表明,当应用于语境时,解释力有限——比如意大利的语境——呈现出社会经济特征,以及与美国截然不同的理论传统。