Guest Editor's Introduction

Zhu Jiangang
{"title":"Guest Editor's Introduction","authors":"Zhu Jiangang","doi":"10.2753/csa0009-4625400200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990s, with the reform of the market economy system, urbanization, and the impact of globalization, urban communities are being reconstructed and renewed at an unprecedented rate. In the process of rapid economic development, the relatively sluggish social administration has also brought about an increasingly tense relationship among urban residents, the state, and real estate developers. Facing large numbers of problems such as pollution, forced removal, building management charges, and land occupation, residents are not only appealing to local government, but are also beginning to organize themselves, taking collective action to defend their residential rights. Academics are now increasingly paying more attention to the study of these actions defending homeowners’ rights. The three articles in this issue focus on action strategy, culture frame, and value justification in movements in defense of homeowner rights. In the case of Lijiang Garden, Guangzhou, studied by Zhu Jiangang and Wang Chao, senior homeowners alternately used strategies of authentication and challenge to wrestle with a real estate management company, trying to organize a homeowners’ committee and participate in community governance. Behind their strategies were two sets of cultural logic: family and legitimacy. In the study of the case of West Passage, Rear Sea Division, Shenzhen city, Liu Chun used justification modes to discuss the six concepts of homeowners’ values in their actions in defense of their rights as well as the process of growth and decline in these six values. Zhu Jiangang’s study on the fight for","PeriodicalId":84447,"journal":{"name":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","volume":"36 1","pages":"3 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/csa0009-4625400200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1990s, with the reform of the market economy system, urbanization, and the impact of globalization, urban communities are being reconstructed and renewed at an unprecedented rate. In the process of rapid economic development, the relatively sluggish social administration has also brought about an increasingly tense relationship among urban residents, the state, and real estate developers. Facing large numbers of problems such as pollution, forced removal, building management charges, and land occupation, residents are not only appealing to local government, but are also beginning to organize themselves, taking collective action to defend their residential rights. Academics are now increasingly paying more attention to the study of these actions defending homeowners’ rights. The three articles in this issue focus on action strategy, culture frame, and value justification in movements in defense of homeowner rights. In the case of Lijiang Garden, Guangzhou, studied by Zhu Jiangang and Wang Chao, senior homeowners alternately used strategies of authentication and challenge to wrestle with a real estate management company, trying to organize a homeowners’ committee and participate in community governance. Behind their strategies were two sets of cultural logic: family and legitimacy. In the study of the case of West Passage, Rear Sea Division, Shenzhen city, Liu Chun used justification modes to discuss the six concepts of homeowners’ values in their actions in defense of their rights as well as the process of growth and decline in these six values. Zhu Jiangang’s study on the fight for
特邀编辑简介
20世纪90年代以来,随着市场经济体制改革、城市化和全球化的影响,城市社区正以前所未有的速度重建和更新。在经济快速发展的过程中,相对滞后的社会管理也导致城市居民、国家和房地产开发商之间的关系日益紧张。面对污染、强拆、房屋管理收费、土地占用等大量问题,居民们不仅向当地政府申诉,而且开始组织起来,采取集体行动捍卫自己的居住权。学者们现在越来越多地关注这些保护房主权利的行动的研究。这期的三篇文章聚焦于行动策略、文化框架和捍卫房主权利运动的价值论证。在朱建刚、王超研究的广州丽江花园案例中,老年房主交替使用认证与挑战策略与物业管理公司角力,试图组织房主委员会,参与社区治理。他们的策略背后有两套文化逻辑:家族和合法性。刘春以深圳市后海分区西通道案例为研究对象,运用辩护模式探讨了业主维权行为中的六种价值观念,以及这六种价值观念的涨跌过程。朱建刚的研究之争
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信