Node-ified Ethics: Contesting Codified Ethics as Unethical in ECEC in Ontario

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lisa Johnston
{"title":"Node-ified Ethics: Contesting Codified Ethics as Unethical in ECEC in Ontario","authors":"Lisa Johnston","doi":"10.37119/ojs2022.v28i1b.648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this conceptual article, I argue that there is a difference between codified ethics and the ethical. I begin by situating code of ethics in the broader professionalization movement in early childhood education. Drawing upon Gunilla Dahlberg and Peter Moss (2005), I discuss the dematerialization of early childhood educators (ECEs) and the instrumentalization of early childhood education and care (ECEC) in Ontario through the implementation of the Code of Ethics by the College of Early Childhood Education ( 2017). Thinking with Eve Tuck’s (2018) question of “How shall we live?” (p. 157), I take up a critical invitation from Sharon Todd (2003) to consider how codified ethics in education may be rethought “as a relation across difference” (p. 2). I work conceptually with the imagery of nodes from the film Sleep Dealer by Alex Rivera (2008) as an aesthetic device to examine the effect of codified ethics on ECEs. Finally, in conversation with Joanna Zylinska (2014) and Tim Ingold (2011), I re-frame instrumentalized nodes/codes of ethics within the complexity of knots and meshworks to recover the ethical in early childhood education. I offer this piece as a warning that solely relying on codified ethics completes the transformation of the ECE into a worker technician and may be leading us toward a dystopian future and as a call to activism to engage in the complex ethical work required in the small everyday spaces of the early childhood classroom.\nKeywords: early childhood education, codified ethics, ethical, nodes, dematerialization, instrumentalization","PeriodicalId":45813,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37119/ojs2022.v28i1b.648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this conceptual article, I argue that there is a difference between codified ethics and the ethical. I begin by situating code of ethics in the broader professionalization movement in early childhood education. Drawing upon Gunilla Dahlberg and Peter Moss (2005), I discuss the dematerialization of early childhood educators (ECEs) and the instrumentalization of early childhood education and care (ECEC) in Ontario through the implementation of the Code of Ethics by the College of Early Childhood Education ( 2017). Thinking with Eve Tuck’s (2018) question of “How shall we live?” (p. 157), I take up a critical invitation from Sharon Todd (2003) to consider how codified ethics in education may be rethought “as a relation across difference” (p. 2). I work conceptually with the imagery of nodes from the film Sleep Dealer by Alex Rivera (2008) as an aesthetic device to examine the effect of codified ethics on ECEs. Finally, in conversation with Joanna Zylinska (2014) and Tim Ingold (2011), I re-frame instrumentalized nodes/codes of ethics within the complexity of knots and meshworks to recover the ethical in early childhood education. I offer this piece as a warning that solely relying on codified ethics completes the transformation of the ECE into a worker technician and may be leading us toward a dystopian future and as a call to activism to engage in the complex ethical work required in the small everyday spaces of the early childhood classroom. Keywords: early childhood education, codified ethics, ethical, nodes, dematerialization, instrumentalization
节点化的伦理:安大略ECEC中对法典化伦理道德的质疑
在这篇概念性的文章中,我认为在编纂的伦理和伦理之间存在着区别。我首先将道德准则置于幼儿教育更广泛的专业化运动中。借鉴Gunilla Dahlberg和Peter Moss(2005),我通过实施早期儿童教育学院(2017)的道德准则,讨论了安大略省早期儿童教育工作者(ECEs)的非物质化和早期儿童教育和护理(ECEC)的工具化。思考伊芙·塔克(2018)的问题“我们该如何生活?”(第157页),我接受了莎伦·托德(2003)的重要邀请,考虑如何将教育中的编纂伦理“作为一种跨差异的关系”重新思考(第2页)。我从概念上利用亚历克斯·里维拉(2008)的电影《睡眠经销商》中的节点图像,作为一种美学手段来研究编纂伦理对幼儿教育的影响。最后,在与Joanna Zylinska(2014)和Tim Ingold(2011)的对话中,我在复杂的结和网中重新构建了工具化的节点/道德规范,以恢复幼儿教育中的伦理。我把这篇文章作为一种警告,仅仅依靠成文的道德规范就完成了欧洲经委会向工人技术人员的转变,可能会把我们引向一个反乌托邦的未来,并呼吁激进主义参与到幼儿教室的小日常空间中所需的复杂道德工作中来。关键词:幼儿教育,法典伦理,伦理,节点,去物质化,工具化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Education
Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Research in Education has an established focus on the sociology and psychology of education and gives increased emphasis to current practical issues of direct interest to those in the teaching profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信