Notranjska v regionalizaciji Slovenije

Q3 Social Sciences
Geografski Vestnik Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.3986/gv94207
Janez Nared
{"title":"Notranjska v regionalizaciji Slovenije","authors":"Janez Nared","doi":"10.3986/gv94207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"V prispevku smo preučili, kakšna delitev na pokrajine bi bila z vidika Notranjske najbolj primerna. Analizirali smo centralnost naselij, dnevno mobilnost delovne sile in sektorske členitve, s spletnim anketiranjem pa smo preverili, kje anketiranci koristijo storitve regionalnega pomena ter kaj menijo o predlaganih regionalizacijah. Rezultati nakazujejo na dve skupini občin – občine vzhodno od nekdanje rapalske meje, ki gravitirajo proti Ljubljani, ter občine zahodno od nekdanje rapalske meje, ki gravitirajo proti Postojni in Kopru. Medtem ko anketiranci iz slednjih prednost dajejo povezovanju z obalno-kraškimi občinami, nasprotujejo pa povezovanju z osrednjeslovenskimi občinami, anketiranci iz občin vzhodno od nekdanje rapalske meje v ospredje postavljajo povezovanje notranjskih občin in oblikovanje samostojne Notranjske pokrajine. Izhajajoč iz strokovnih meril in deljenega mnenja anketirancev oblikovanje Notranjske kot samostojne pokrajine ni smiselno. // \nInner Carniola in the regionalization of Slovenia \nThis article investigates which regionalization would be the most suitable with regard to the region of Inner Carniola. It analyzes the area’s central settlements, workforce commuting, and sectoral divisions, as well as information from an online survey determining where respondents use services of regional importance and what their attitudes are about proposed regionalizations. The results indicate two groups of municipalities: municipalities east of the former Rapallo border that are oriented toward Ljubljana, and municipalities west of the former Rapallo border that are oriented toward Postojna and Koper. Respondents from the latter give priority to connections with the coastal municipalities, but they are opposed to strengthening connections with municipalities in central Slovenia, whereas respondents from the municipalities east of the former Rapallo border prioritize connections with other municipalities in Inner Carniola and the creation of Inner Carniola as a separate region. Based on professional criteria and the divided opinion of the respondents, the designation of Inner Carniola as a separate region does not make sense.","PeriodicalId":52453,"journal":{"name":"Geografski Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografski Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/gv94207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

V prispevku smo preučili, kakšna delitev na pokrajine bi bila z vidika Notranjske najbolj primerna. Analizirali smo centralnost naselij, dnevno mobilnost delovne sile in sektorske členitve, s spletnim anketiranjem pa smo preverili, kje anketiranci koristijo storitve regionalnega pomena ter kaj menijo o predlaganih regionalizacijah. Rezultati nakazujejo na dve skupini občin – občine vzhodno od nekdanje rapalske meje, ki gravitirajo proti Ljubljani, ter občine zahodno od nekdanje rapalske meje, ki gravitirajo proti Postojni in Kopru. Medtem ko anketiranci iz slednjih prednost dajejo povezovanju z obalno-kraškimi občinami, nasprotujejo pa povezovanju z osrednjeslovenskimi občinami, anketiranci iz občin vzhodno od nekdanje rapalske meje v ospredje postavljajo povezovanje notranjskih občin in oblikovanje samostojne Notranjske pokrajine. Izhajajoč iz strokovnih meril in deljenega mnenja anketirancev oblikovanje Notranjske kot samostojne pokrajine ni smiselno. // Inner Carniola in the regionalization of Slovenia This article investigates which regionalization would be the most suitable with regard to the region of Inner Carniola. It analyzes the area’s central settlements, workforce commuting, and sectoral divisions, as well as information from an online survey determining where respondents use services of regional importance and what their attitudes are about proposed regionalizations. The results indicate two groups of municipalities: municipalities east of the former Rapallo border that are oriented toward Ljubljana, and municipalities west of the former Rapallo border that are oriented toward Postojna and Koper. Respondents from the latter give priority to connections with the coastal municipalities, but they are opposed to strengthening connections with municipalities in central Slovenia, whereas respondents from the municipalities east of the former Rapallo border prioritize connections with other municipalities in Inner Carniola and the creation of Inner Carniola as a separate region. Based on professional criteria and the divided opinion of the respondents, the designation of Inner Carniola as a separate region does not make sense.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geografski Vestnik
Geografski Vestnik Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信