The imaginary eruption. Volcanic activity through kids’ eyes

Q2 Social Sciences
M. Todesco, E. Ercolani, F. Brasini, D. Modonesi, V. Pessina, R. Nave, R. Camassi
{"title":"The imaginary eruption. Volcanic activity through kids’ eyes","authors":"M. Todesco, E. Ercolani, F. Brasini, D. Modonesi, V. Pessina, R. Nave, R. Camassi","doi":"10.5194/gc-2022-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Strategies of risk mitigation become effective when citizens facing hazardous phenomena adopt rational behaviors that contribute to lower the risk. This is more likely to occur when endangered communities share a widespread understanding of natural phenomena and their impacts. To reach this goal, educational and outreach materials are often organized around the descriptions of the natural process and its effects. Unfortunately, however, receiving correct information does not automatically grant the adoption of safe behaviors. Our teaching efforts may fail because of pre-existing biases, beliefs and misconceptions. The identification of these biases is important to plan effective educational campaigns, capable of providing the concepts that are needed to actually inform citizens’ choices about natural hazards. In this work, we present the results of an unconventional workshop on volcanic risk that we proposed to primary and secondary schools (ages 6–13), in Italy. The workshop is meant to explore the mental models that kids and youngsters have about volcanic eruptions and it takes the form of a creative exercise. We asked the students to draw and write a story in four frames, describing the onset and outcome of an imaginary eruption. All stories were then presented to the class, and always provided interesting hints to spark discussion about volcanic processes and hazards. As a whole, the collected stories provide an interesting, multifaceted description of volcanic eruptions and their potential impacts, as imagined by the kids. A careful analysis of this material provided interesting insights useful to improve future outreach material and educational plans. The workshop is simple to reproduce, even remotely, and could be easily extended to different types of hazards. While very simple to organize, this approach grants the secure engagement of most participants and offers a very different perspective on pupils’ understanding of natural phenomena.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2022-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Strategies of risk mitigation become effective when citizens facing hazardous phenomena adopt rational behaviors that contribute to lower the risk. This is more likely to occur when endangered communities share a widespread understanding of natural phenomena and their impacts. To reach this goal, educational and outreach materials are often organized around the descriptions of the natural process and its effects. Unfortunately, however, receiving correct information does not automatically grant the adoption of safe behaviors. Our teaching efforts may fail because of pre-existing biases, beliefs and misconceptions. The identification of these biases is important to plan effective educational campaigns, capable of providing the concepts that are needed to actually inform citizens’ choices about natural hazards. In this work, we present the results of an unconventional workshop on volcanic risk that we proposed to primary and secondary schools (ages 6–13), in Italy. The workshop is meant to explore the mental models that kids and youngsters have about volcanic eruptions and it takes the form of a creative exercise. We asked the students to draw and write a story in four frames, describing the onset and outcome of an imaginary eruption. All stories were then presented to the class, and always provided interesting hints to spark discussion about volcanic processes and hazards. As a whole, the collected stories provide an interesting, multifaceted description of volcanic eruptions and their potential impacts, as imagined by the kids. A careful analysis of this material provided interesting insights useful to improve future outreach material and educational plans. The workshop is simple to reproduce, even remotely, and could be easily extended to different types of hazards. While very simple to organize, this approach grants the secure engagement of most participants and offers a very different perspective on pupils’ understanding of natural phenomena.
想象中的火山爆发。孩子们眼中的火山活动
摘要当面临危险现象的公民采取有助于降低风险的理性行为时,风险缓解战略就会生效。当濒临灭绝的社区对自然现象及其影响有广泛的了解时,这种情况更有可能发生。为了达到这一目标,教育和推广材料经常围绕自然过程及其影响的描述进行组织。然而,不幸的是,获得正确的信息并不能自动授予采取安全行为。我们的教学努力可能会因为预先存在的偏见、信仰和误解而失败。识别这些偏见对于规划有效的教育运动非常重要,这些运动能够提供实际告知公民对自然灾害的选择所需的概念。在这项工作中,我们向意大利的小学和中学(6-13岁)提出了一个关于火山风险的非常规研讨会的结果。该研讨会旨在探索儿童和青少年对火山爆发的思维模式,并采取创造性练习的形式。我们要求学生在四个框架内画和写一个故事,描述假想的火山爆发的开始和结果。所有的故事都在课堂上呈现,并总是提供有趣的提示,引发关于火山过程和危险的讨论。作为一个整体,收集的故事提供了一个有趣的,多方面的描述火山爆发及其潜在的影响,正如孩子们想象的那样。对这些材料的仔细分析提供了有趣的见解,有助于改进未来的推广材料和教育计划。该车间易于复制,甚至可以远程复制,并且可以轻松扩展到不同类型的危害。虽然组织起来非常简单,但这种方法保证了大多数参与者的安全参与,并为学生对自然现象的理解提供了一个非常不同的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信