Endemic macrophyte is more plastic than two cosmopolitan species in fluctuating water levels and nutrient-enriched conditions

IF 0.8 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
J. Packer, G. Ganf, Christoph Kueffer, J. M. Facelli, P. Pyšek
{"title":"Endemic macrophyte is more plastic than two cosmopolitan species in fluctuating water levels and nutrient-enriched conditions","authors":"J. Packer, G. Ganf, Christoph Kueffer, J. M. Facelli, P. Pyšek","doi":"10.1080/03721426.2020.1848981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Plant communities within many of the world’s waterways are losing diversity where flows are stabilised for security and enriched from land-use intensification. Understanding the phenotypic plasticity of plant species that protect and/or store their below-ground biomass during floods may help to promote them if problematic, overabundant species – like Phragmites australis and Typha domingensis – are less plastic. To investigate mechanisms underlying the plasticity of two cosmopolitan (Phragmites, Typha) and two endemic (Cycnogeton procerum, Cyperus gymnocaulos) macrophytes in response to disturbance (fluctuating hydrological regimes) across a nutrient gradient, we analysed historical data from pond experiments with single-species pots. Our analyses showed fluctuating water levels in nutrient-enriched conditions reduced total biomass in all species, with 65% and 46% reduction in Phragmites and Typha respectively. Contrary to expectations, only Cycnogeton allocated a higher proportion of biomass to protect (root) and store (rhizome) resources in fluctuating water levels and nutrient-enriched conditions (45% versus 23% in stable regime), and was the most plastic by allocating 75% more biomass to belowground in the least favourable conditions. Our results indicate that removing impediments to stochastic flooding disturbance could benefit some endemic species while reducing the productivity of overabundant Phragmites and Typha in environments enriched by human activity.","PeriodicalId":49425,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03721426.2020.1848981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Plant communities within many of the world’s waterways are losing diversity where flows are stabilised for security and enriched from land-use intensification. Understanding the phenotypic plasticity of plant species that protect and/or store their below-ground biomass during floods may help to promote them if problematic, overabundant species – like Phragmites australis and Typha domingensis – are less plastic. To investigate mechanisms underlying the plasticity of two cosmopolitan (Phragmites, Typha) and two endemic (Cycnogeton procerum, Cyperus gymnocaulos) macrophytes in response to disturbance (fluctuating hydrological regimes) across a nutrient gradient, we analysed historical data from pond experiments with single-species pots. Our analyses showed fluctuating water levels in nutrient-enriched conditions reduced total biomass in all species, with 65% and 46% reduction in Phragmites and Typha respectively. Contrary to expectations, only Cycnogeton allocated a higher proportion of biomass to protect (root) and store (rhizome) resources in fluctuating water levels and nutrient-enriched conditions (45% versus 23% in stable regime), and was the most plastic by allocating 75% more biomass to belowground in the least favourable conditions. Our results indicate that removing impediments to stochastic flooding disturbance could benefit some endemic species while reducing the productivity of overabundant Phragmites and Typha in environments enriched by human activity.
地方性大型植物在波动的水位和营养丰富的条件下比两个世界性物种更具可塑性
世界上许多水道内的植物群落正在失去多样性,这些水道的流量因土地利用集约化而稳定,并因安全而丰富。了解在洪水期间保护和/或储存其地下生物量的植物物种的表型可塑性,可能有助于促进它们的发展,如果有问题,过度丰富的物种-如芦苇和叶霉-可塑性较差。为了研究两种世界性(芦苇、Typha)和两种地方性(Cycnogeton procerum、Cyperus gymnocaulos)大型植物在营养梯度扰动(波动水文制度)下的可塑性机制,我们分析了单种盆栽池塘实验的历史数据。我们的分析表明,在营养丰富的条件下,波动的水位降低了所有物种的总生物量,芦苇和Typha分别减少了65%和46%。与预期相反,只有Cycnogeton在波动的水位和营养丰富的条件下分配了更高比例的生物量来保护(根)和储存(根茎)资源(45%,而在稳定的条件下为23%),并且在最不利的条件下分配了75%以上的生物量,是最具可塑性的。我们的研究结果表明,在人类活动丰富的环境中,消除随机洪水干扰的障碍可能有利于一些特有物种,但会降低过度丰富的芦苇和台风的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1880, the Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high quality, peer-reviewed papers of particular relevance to Australasia. There is a particular focus on natural history topics such as: botany, zoology, geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, meteorology, geophysics, biophysics, soil science and environmental science, and environmental health. However, the journal is not restricted to these fields, with papers concerning epidemiology, ethnology, anthropology, linguistics, and the history of science and exploration also welcomed. Submissions are welcome from all authors, and membership of the Royal Society of South Australia is not required. The following types of manuscripts are welcome: Reviews, Original Research Papers, History of Science and Exploration, Brief Communications, Obituaries.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信