White Backlash in a Brown Country

T. Smith
{"title":"White Backlash in a Brown Country","authors":"T. Smith","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2759695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discourse on “white backlash” implicitly references whites’ reaction to some perceived civil rights excess but fails to identify a more systemic etiology. In this article, Professor Terry Smith employs clinical psychology to analyze white backlash as symptomatic of whites’ addiction to privilege. Noting that the United State Supreme Court has only once even invoked the term “white backlash” despite its recurrence throughout American history, Professor Smith argues that this judicial reticence is due in part to the Court’s participation in reactionary resistance to civil rights progress. Using the diminished electoral fortunes of Democrats during the Obama presidency as a foundation, Smith argues that a new white backlash is occurring just as the nation is accelerating its transition from a white to a brown population. The article explores how this demographic shift differentiates current white backlash from past eras, as evidenced by, among other indicia, the emergence of a “new white nationalism” that has formed an imbricate relationship with modern political conservatism. The article concludes by discussing the ways in which the two major political parties are adapting to and exploiting the browning of the country and white trauma in response to the same.","PeriodicalId":83444,"journal":{"name":"Valparaiso University law review. Valparaiso University. School of Law","volume":"22 1","pages":"89-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valparaiso University law review. Valparaiso University. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2759695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discourse on “white backlash” implicitly references whites’ reaction to some perceived civil rights excess but fails to identify a more systemic etiology. In this article, Professor Terry Smith employs clinical psychology to analyze white backlash as symptomatic of whites’ addiction to privilege. Noting that the United State Supreme Court has only once even invoked the term “white backlash” despite its recurrence throughout American history, Professor Smith argues that this judicial reticence is due in part to the Court’s participation in reactionary resistance to civil rights progress. Using the diminished electoral fortunes of Democrats during the Obama presidency as a foundation, Smith argues that a new white backlash is occurring just as the nation is accelerating its transition from a white to a brown population. The article explores how this demographic shift differentiates current white backlash from past eras, as evidenced by, among other indicia, the emergence of a “new white nationalism” that has formed an imbricate relationship with modern political conservatism. The article concludes by discussing the ways in which the two major political parties are adapting to and exploiting the browning of the country and white trauma in response to the same.
棕色国家的白人反弹
关于“白人反弹”的论述含蓄地提到了白人对某些被认为是过度民权的反应,但未能确定一个更系统的病因。在这篇文章中,特里·史密斯教授运用临床心理学分析了白人对特权成瘾的症状。史密斯教授指出,尽管“白人反攻”一词在美国历史上反复出现,但美国最高法院甚至只引用过一次。他认为,这种司法沉默部分是由于法院参与了对民权进步的反动抵抗。史密斯以民主党在奥巴马总统任期内的选举运气下降为基础,认为就在美国加速从白人人口向棕色人口过渡之际,一种新的白人反弹正在发生。这篇文章探讨了这种人口结构的变化是如何将当前的白人反弹与过去的时代区分开来的,在其他迹象中,“新白人民族主义”的出现与现代政治保守主义形成了微妙的关系。文章最后讨论了两大政党如何适应和利用这个国家的褐化和白人的创伤作为回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信