Diagnostic Utility of Reduced Radiation Dose Non-Contrast-Enhanced CT with Iterative Reconstruction for Screening in High-Risk Individuals with Pancreatic Cancer: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study

H. Mori, Yasunari Yamada, M. Kiyonaga, Tomoaki Shiroo, T. Yoshitake, S. Matsumoto, R. Takaji, M. Okahara, T. Itoh
{"title":"Diagnostic Utility of Reduced Radiation Dose Non-Contrast-Enhanced CT with Iterative Reconstruction for Screening in High-Risk Individuals with Pancreatic Cancer: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study","authors":"H. Mori, Yasunari Yamada, M. Kiyonaga, Tomoaki Shiroo, T. Yoshitake, S. Matsumoto, R. Takaji, M. Okahara, T. Itoh","doi":"10.4172/2165-7092.1000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous studies showed that the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) and pancreatic cysts were the important predictors of the subsequent development of pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to reveal the utility of non-contrast reduced radiation dose CT with iterative reconstruction for screening in high risk pancreatic cancer individuals by assessing the dilated MPD and cysts by using abdominal phantoms. \nMaterials and methods: Two phantoms with normal and abnormal pancreas with dilated MPD (5 mm) and cysts (5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm) were constructed. Each phantom was scanned by ten images using following three protocols: 120 kVp and 120mA with filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm (120 kVp-FBP), 80 kVp and 168mA with FBP algorithm (80 kVp-FBP), and 80 kVp and 168mA with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) (80 kVp-SAFIRE). The image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the 15mm cyst were assessed. The radiation dose was assessed with the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). Two radiologists scored the image quality and conspicuity of the dilated MPD and cysts. \nResults: Mean image noise significantly decreased from 80 kVp-FBP images to 80 kVp-SAFIRE and 120 kVp-FBP images (p < 0.001). The CNR significantly increased from 80 kVp-FBP images to 120 kVp-FBP and 80 kVp-SAFIRE images (p < 0.05). Image quality was significantly lower in the 80 kVp-FBP images than in 120 kVp-FBP and 80 kVp- SAFIRE images in both readers (p < 0.05). The conspicuity point for the dilated MPD and three cysts was higher in 80 kVp-SAFIRE images than in 80 kVp-FBP and 120 kVp-FBP images. CTDIvol was reduced by 60 % at 80 kVp protocol. \nConclusion: Non-contrast 80 kVp-SAFIRE CT protocol allowed for higher conspicuity of dilated MPD and cysts at a reduced radiation dose compared with 120 kVp-FBP protocols.","PeriodicalId":89708,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatic disorders & therapy","volume":"35 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatic disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7092.1000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Previous studies showed that the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) and pancreatic cysts were the important predictors of the subsequent development of pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to reveal the utility of non-contrast reduced radiation dose CT with iterative reconstruction for screening in high risk pancreatic cancer individuals by assessing the dilated MPD and cysts by using abdominal phantoms. Materials and methods: Two phantoms with normal and abnormal pancreas with dilated MPD (5 mm) and cysts (5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm) were constructed. Each phantom was scanned by ten images using following three protocols: 120 kVp and 120mA with filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm (120 kVp-FBP), 80 kVp and 168mA with FBP algorithm (80 kVp-FBP), and 80 kVp and 168mA with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) (80 kVp-SAFIRE). The image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the 15mm cyst were assessed. The radiation dose was assessed with the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). Two radiologists scored the image quality and conspicuity of the dilated MPD and cysts. Results: Mean image noise significantly decreased from 80 kVp-FBP images to 80 kVp-SAFIRE and 120 kVp-FBP images (p < 0.001). The CNR significantly increased from 80 kVp-FBP images to 120 kVp-FBP and 80 kVp-SAFIRE images (p < 0.05). Image quality was significantly lower in the 80 kVp-FBP images than in 120 kVp-FBP and 80 kVp- SAFIRE images in both readers (p < 0.05). The conspicuity point for the dilated MPD and three cysts was higher in 80 kVp-SAFIRE images than in 80 kVp-FBP and 120 kVp-FBP images. CTDIvol was reduced by 60 % at 80 kVp protocol. Conclusion: Non-contrast 80 kVp-SAFIRE CT protocol allowed for higher conspicuity of dilated MPD and cysts at a reduced radiation dose compared with 120 kVp-FBP protocols.
低辐射剂量非对比增强CT迭代重建在胰腺癌高危人群筛查中的诊断应用:一项拟人化幻影研究
背景:既往研究表明,主胰管扩张和胰腺囊肿是胰腺癌后续发展的重要预测因素。本研究的目的是揭示非对比降低辐射剂量CT与迭代重建在筛查高危胰腺癌个体中的效用,通过腹部幻象评估扩张的MPD和囊肿。材料与方法:构建正常胰腺和异常胰腺幻象,MPD扩张(5mm)和囊肿(5mm、10mm和15mm)。采用滤波后投影(FBP)算法120 kVp和120mA (120 kVp-FBP), 80 kVp和168mA (80 kVp-FBP), 80 kVp和168mA (80 kVp-FBP), 80 kVp和168mA sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) (80 kVp-SAFIRE), 10张图像扫描每个幻像。评估15mm囊肿的图像噪声和噪比(CNR)。用体积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)评估放射剂量。两名放射科医生对扩张的MPD和囊肿的图像质量和显著性进行评分。结果:平均图像噪声从80 kVp-FBP图像显著降低到80 kVp-SAFIRE和120 kVp-FBP图像(p < 0.001)。CNR从80 kVp-FBP显著增加到120 kVp-FBP和80 kVp-SAFIRE (p < 0.05)。80 kVp- fbp图像的图像质量明显低于120 kVp- fbp和80 kVp- SAFIRE图像(p < 0.05)。80 kVp-SAFIRE图像的MPD扩张和3个囊肿的显著点高于80 kVp-FBP和120 kVp-FBP图像。在80kvp条件下,CTDIvol降低60%。结论:与120 kVp-FBP方案相比,非对比80 kVp-SAFIRE CT方案在降低辐射剂量下对扩张性MPD和囊肿具有更高的显着性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信