A study of lifestyle modifications with and without metformin in prediabetic subjects

Asha Basavareddy, N. Sarala, V. Nanjappa, S. Eshwarappa
{"title":"A study of lifestyle modifications with and without metformin in prediabetic subjects","authors":"Asha Basavareddy, N. Sarala, V. Nanjappa, S. Eshwarappa","doi":"10.4103/jod.jod_40_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Prediabetes is a stage in the natural history of impaired glucose metabolism rather than as a distinctive clinical entity. The primary objective was to compare the effect of lifestyle modifications (LSMs) with and without metformin in prolonging the onset of diabetes mellitus in prediabetics. Materials and Methods: This study is an open label, parallel group comparative study conducted from 2016 to 2020. One hundred and four prediabetic subjects were assigned to two groups: group I (51) LSM and group II (53) metformin 500 mg along with LSM. Baseline investigations included fasting blood sugar (FBS), post-prandial blood sugar (PPBS), HbA1c, and lipid profile, followed up for 12 months. Results: The baseline parameters were comparable between the groups. In both the groups, there was a significant reduction in abdominal circumference, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, FBS, PPBS, and HbA1c between baseline and 1 year. There was no significant difference between groups I and II in reduction of all the above-mentioned parameters. The outcomes of prediabetic subjects after 1 year of treatment in both the groups were comparable. Only one (2.1%) subject had more than 126 mmHg FBS in the LSM group. The adverse effects observed were dizziness, nausea, flatulence, myalgia, abdominal pain, and heart burn, which were mild to moderate in intensity and in most patients it subsided with time. Conclusion: LSM alone was equivalent to LSM along with metformin in effective control of blood sugars. Lipid profile and weight may be significantly reduced.","PeriodicalId":15627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetology","volume":"30 1","pages":"277 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_40_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Prediabetes is a stage in the natural history of impaired glucose metabolism rather than as a distinctive clinical entity. The primary objective was to compare the effect of lifestyle modifications (LSMs) with and without metformin in prolonging the onset of diabetes mellitus in prediabetics. Materials and Methods: This study is an open label, parallel group comparative study conducted from 2016 to 2020. One hundred and four prediabetic subjects were assigned to two groups: group I (51) LSM and group II (53) metformin 500 mg along with LSM. Baseline investigations included fasting blood sugar (FBS), post-prandial blood sugar (PPBS), HbA1c, and lipid profile, followed up for 12 months. Results: The baseline parameters were comparable between the groups. In both the groups, there was a significant reduction in abdominal circumference, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, FBS, PPBS, and HbA1c between baseline and 1 year. There was no significant difference between groups I and II in reduction of all the above-mentioned parameters. The outcomes of prediabetic subjects after 1 year of treatment in both the groups were comparable. Only one (2.1%) subject had more than 126 mmHg FBS in the LSM group. The adverse effects observed were dizziness, nausea, flatulence, myalgia, abdominal pain, and heart burn, which were mild to moderate in intensity and in most patients it subsided with time. Conclusion: LSM alone was equivalent to LSM along with metformin in effective control of blood sugars. Lipid profile and weight may be significantly reduced.
糖尿病前期患者使用和不使用二甲双胍改变生活方式的研究
目的:前驱糖尿病是糖代谢受损的自然历史阶段,而不是一个独特的临床实体。主要目的是比较生活方式改变(lsm)加二甲双胍和不加二甲双胍对延长糖尿病前期发病的影响。材料与方法:本研究为开放标签、平行组比较研究,研究时间为2016 - 2020年。104名前驱糖尿病患者被分为两组:第一组(51人)服用LSM,第二组(53人)服用二甲双胍500mg并服用LSM。基线调查包括空腹血糖(FBS)、餐后血糖(PPBS)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和血脂,随访12个月。结果:两组间基线参数具有可比性。两组患者的腹围、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白、FBS、PPBS和HbA1c在基线和1年间均有显著降低。在上述各项指标的降低上,I组与II组无显著差异。两组治疗1年后糖尿病前期受试者的结果具有可比性。在LSM组中,只有一个(2.1%)受试者的FBS超过126 mmHg。观察到的不良反应为头晕、恶心、胀气、肌痛、腹痛和心脏灼热,其强度为轻至中度,大多数患者随时间消退。结论:LSM单用与LSM联用二甲双胍控制血糖效果相当。血脂和体重可能会显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信