{"title":"Morpho-syntactic Variation in Romance v: A Micro-parametric Approach","authors":"Ángel J. Gallego","doi":"10.1515/probus-2020-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper discusses a series of morpho-syntactic properties of Romance languages that have the functional projection vP as its locus, showing a continuum that goes from strongly configurational Romance languages to partially configurational Romance languages. It is argued that v-related phenomena like Differential Object Marking (DOM), participial agreement, oblique clitics, auxiliary selection, and others align in a systematic way when it comes to inflectional properties that involve Case-agreement properties. In order to account for the facts, I argue for a micro-parametric approach whereby v can be associated with an additional projection subject to variation (cf. D’Alessandro, Merging Probes. A typology of person splits and person-driven differential object marking. Ms., University of Leiden, 2012; Microvariation and syntactic theory. What dialects tell us about language. Invited talk given at the workshop The Syntactic Variation of Catalan and Spanish Dialects, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, June 26–28, 2013; Ordóñez, Cartography of postverbal subjects in Spanish and Catalan. In Sergio Baauw, Frank AC Drijkoningen & Manuela Pinto (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2005: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Utrecht, 8–10 December 2005, 259–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007). I label such projection “X,” arguing that its feature content and position varies across Romance. More generally, the present paper aims at contributing to our understanding of parametric variation of closely related languages by exploiting the intuition, embodied in the so-called Borer-Chomsky Conjecture, that linguistic variation resides in the functional inventory of the lexicon.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2020-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract This paper discusses a series of morpho-syntactic properties of Romance languages that have the functional projection vP as its locus, showing a continuum that goes from strongly configurational Romance languages to partially configurational Romance languages. It is argued that v-related phenomena like Differential Object Marking (DOM), participial agreement, oblique clitics, auxiliary selection, and others align in a systematic way when it comes to inflectional properties that involve Case-agreement properties. In order to account for the facts, I argue for a micro-parametric approach whereby v can be associated with an additional projection subject to variation (cf. D’Alessandro, Merging Probes. A typology of person splits and person-driven differential object marking. Ms., University of Leiden, 2012; Microvariation and syntactic theory. What dialects tell us about language. Invited talk given at the workshop The Syntactic Variation of Catalan and Spanish Dialects, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, June 26–28, 2013; Ordóñez, Cartography of postverbal subjects in Spanish and Catalan. In Sergio Baauw, Frank AC Drijkoningen & Manuela Pinto (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2005: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Utrecht, 8–10 December 2005, 259–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007). I label such projection “X,” arguing that its feature content and position varies across Romance. More generally, the present paper aims at contributing to our understanding of parametric variation of closely related languages by exploiting the intuition, embodied in the so-called Borer-Chomsky Conjecture, that linguistic variation resides in the functional inventory of the lexicon.
摘要本文讨论了以功能投影vP为轨迹的罗曼语的一系列形态句法性质,显示了从强构形罗曼语到部分构形罗曼语的连续体。有人认为,当涉及到涉及Case-agreement属性的屈折特性时,与v相关的现象,如差异对象标记(DOM)、分词一致、倾斜键、辅助选择等,以一种系统的方式对齐。为了解释事实,我主张采用微参数方法,即v可以与受变化影响的附加投影相关联(参见D 'Alessandro, merge Probes)。人分裂和人驱动的差异对象标记的类型学。女士,莱顿大学,2012;微变异与句法理论。方言告诉我们的语言。在加泰罗尼亚语和西班牙语方言的句法变化研讨会上的特邀演讲,巴塞罗那大学Autònoma,巴塞罗那,2013年6月26-28日;Ordóñez,西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语后语科目的制图。在Sergio Baauw, Frank AC Drijkoningen和Manuela Pinto(编),浪漫语言和语言学理论2005:从“走向浪漫”的论文选,乌得勒支,8-10十二月2005,259-280。阿姆斯特丹:约翰·本杰明出版社,2007)。我把这样的投影标记为“X”,认为它的特征内容和位置在浪漫主义中是不同的。更一般地说,本文旨在通过利用体现在所谓的波尔-乔姆斯基猜想中的直觉来促进我们对密切相关语言的参数变化的理解,即语言变化存在于词汇的功能清单中。