Coordinative Discourse of Strategic Sovereignty Tilting the European Union’s Institutional Balance

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
T. Romanova, S. V. Mazanik
{"title":"Coordinative Discourse of Strategic Sovereignty Tilting the European Union’s Institutional Balance","authors":"T. Romanova, S. V. Mazanik","doi":"10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-79-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article studies how a discursive contestation among the EU institutions (the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the European Union) of the concept of \"strategic sovereignty\" (\"strategic autonomy\") affects the institutional balance among them. Institutional balance is a dynamic process in which institutions challenge each other's authority. This process is conceptualized in the article in terms of discursive neo-institutionalism as a coordinative discourse, which forms, challenges and justifies the idea of “strategic sovereignty”. The article uses the cases of the EU industrial, trade policy, and the common security and defense policy to demonstrate the changing institutional balance.The results of the study show that the main institutional beneficiary of \"strategic sovereignty\" is the European Commission. Most likely, there will be a strengthening of the Council, which reserves broad powers in crisis management and foreign policy. The position of the Parliament is ambivalent: although the growth of its institutional weight is possible, it will depend both on the Parliament’s own initiatives and on whether the European Commission will succeed at communitarizing new issues and spheres. The findings demonstrate that under crisis, the institutional balance of the EU will continue to tilt in favor of the supranational level of regulation.","PeriodicalId":42127,"journal":{"name":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-79-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article studies how a discursive contestation among the EU institutions (the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the European Union) of the concept of "strategic sovereignty" ("strategic autonomy") affects the institutional balance among them. Institutional balance is a dynamic process in which institutions challenge each other's authority. This process is conceptualized in the article in terms of discursive neo-institutionalism as a coordinative discourse, which forms, challenges and justifies the idea of “strategic sovereignty”. The article uses the cases of the EU industrial, trade policy, and the common security and defense policy to demonstrate the changing institutional balance.The results of the study show that the main institutional beneficiary of "strategic sovereignty" is the European Commission. Most likely, there will be a strengthening of the Council, which reserves broad powers in crisis management and foreign policy. The position of the Parliament is ambivalent: although the growth of its institutional weight is possible, it will depend both on the Parliament’s own initiatives and on whether the European Commission will succeed at communitarizing new issues and spheres. The findings demonstrate that under crisis, the institutional balance of the EU will continue to tilt in favor of the supranational level of regulation.
战略主权的协调话语:欧盟制度平衡的倾斜
本文研究了欧盟机构(欧盟委员会、欧洲议会和欧盟理事会)之间关于“战略主权”(“战略自治”)概念的话语争论如何影响它们之间的制度平衡。制度平衡是制度之间相互挑战权威的动态过程。本文从话语新制度主义的角度将这一过程概念化为一种协调话语,它形成、挑战并证明了“战略主权”的理念。本文以欧盟的工业、贸易政策和共同安全与防务政策为例,论证了制度平衡的变化。研究结果表明,“战略主权”的主要机构受益者是欧盟委员会。最有可能的是,在危机管理和外交政策方面保留广泛权力的安理会将得到加强。欧洲议会的立场是矛盾的:尽管其机构分量的增长是可能的,但这既取决于欧洲议会自己的倡议,也取决于欧盟委员会是否能成功地将新问题和领域共同体化。研究结果表明,在危机下,欧盟的制度平衡将继续向超国家层面的监管倾斜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MGIMO Review of International Relations
MGIMO Review of International Relations INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信