The Efficacy and Safety of Teneligliptin and Metformin versus Glimepiride and Metformin in Patients of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled with Monotherapy

N. Hans
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Teneligliptin and Metformin versus Glimepiride and Metformin in Patients of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled with Monotherapy","authors":"N. Hans","doi":"10.35248/2155-6156.19.10.829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the most common non-communicable diseases associated with short term and long term complications. Material and methods: A total of 60 patients were included in the study divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 patients were given Teneligliptin 10 mg once a day and metformin 500 mg twice a day after meals for 12 weeks. Group 2 patients were given Glimepiride 1 mg once a day and metformin 500 mg twice a day after meals for 12 weeks. After the written consent, history, clinical examination, biochemical investigations including FBG, PPBG, HbA1c and lipid profile were done. Repeat FBG and PPBG were done every week upto 12 weeks. HbA1c and lipid profile were done at the beginning and at the end of study. Results: Change in FBG was more in group 1 as compared to group 2. On comparison of reduction in change in PPBG in patients of group 1 versus group 2, there was a highly significant reduction in group 1. Change in HbA1c, total cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, HDL and LDL was more in group 1 than in group 2. Conclusion: Teneligliptin and metformin caused a greater improvement in glycaemic and lipid profile as compared to Glimepiride and metformin. Thus teneligliptin is more efficacious than glimepiride.","PeriodicalId":15597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes & metabolism","volume":"53 2 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes & metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-6156.19.10.829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the most common non-communicable diseases associated with short term and long term complications. Material and methods: A total of 60 patients were included in the study divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 patients were given Teneligliptin 10 mg once a day and metformin 500 mg twice a day after meals for 12 weeks. Group 2 patients were given Glimepiride 1 mg once a day and metformin 500 mg twice a day after meals for 12 weeks. After the written consent, history, clinical examination, biochemical investigations including FBG, PPBG, HbA1c and lipid profile were done. Repeat FBG and PPBG were done every week upto 12 weeks. HbA1c and lipid profile were done at the beginning and at the end of study. Results: Change in FBG was more in group 1 as compared to group 2. On comparison of reduction in change in PPBG in patients of group 1 versus group 2, there was a highly significant reduction in group 1. Change in HbA1c, total cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, HDL and LDL was more in group 1 than in group 2. Conclusion: Teneligliptin and metformin caused a greater improvement in glycaemic and lipid profile as compared to Glimepiride and metformin. Thus teneligliptin is more efficacious than glimepiride.
替尼格列汀、二甲双胍与格列美脲、二甲双胍在单药治疗无控制的2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性
2型糖尿病是与短期和长期并发症相关的最常见的非传染性疾病之一。材料与方法:共纳入60例患者,分为2组,每组30例。组1患者餐后给予替尼列汀10 mg,每日1次,二甲双胍500 mg,每日2次,疗程12周。组2患者餐后给予格列美脲1 mg / d,二甲双胍500 mg / d,疗程12周。经书面同意后,进行病史、临床检查、生化检查(FBG、PPBG、HbA1c、血脂)。每周重复FBG和PPBG,直到12周。在研究开始和结束时分别检测HbA1c和血脂。结果:1组空腹血糖变化明显大于2组。在比较1组与2组患者PPBG变化的减少情况时,1组患者PPBG的减少非常显著。1组患者HbA1c、总胆固醇水平、甘油三酯水平、HDL和LDL的变化大于2组。结论:与格列美脲和二甲双胍相比,替尼格列汀和二甲双胍对血糖和血脂的改善更大。因此,替尼格列汀比格列美脲更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信