{"title":"Are ‘the affluent’ responsible for global poverty?","authors":"H. Lawford-Smith","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2019.1565611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT According to Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland (2016), there are multiple ways “the affluent” might be morally responsible for the situation the global poor are in, including having failed to assist them on a single occasion or on multiple occasions; by enabling harm to them; by ‘giving rise to cost’ for them; by making it costly for the poor to escape their own suffering; by exploiting them; by overdetermining harm to them. But what exactly is this group, “the affluent”, who Barry and Øverland present as being capable of doing all these things? In this paper I present three possible conceptions of ‘the affluent’, and argue that they all create problems for the conclusions the authors want to reach.","PeriodicalId":55964,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Global Politics","volume":"126 1","pages":"61 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & Global Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1565611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT According to Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland (2016), there are multiple ways “the affluent” might be morally responsible for the situation the global poor are in, including having failed to assist them on a single occasion or on multiple occasions; by enabling harm to them; by ‘giving rise to cost’ for them; by making it costly for the poor to escape their own suffering; by exploiting them; by overdetermining harm to them. But what exactly is this group, “the affluent”, who Barry and Øverland present as being capable of doing all these things? In this paper I present three possible conceptions of ‘the affluent’, and argue that they all create problems for the conclusions the authors want to reach.
根据Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland(2016)的研究,“富人”可能会以多种方式对全球穷人所处的状况承担道德责任,包括在一次或多次未能帮助他们;使他们受到伤害;给他们“增加成本”;通过让穷人付出高昂的代价来摆脱自己的痛苦;利用他们;通过过度确定对他们的伤害。但是Barry和Øverland所呈现的这个“富人”群体到底是什么?在本文中,我提出了“富人”的三种可能的概念,并认为它们都给作者想要得出的结论带来了问题。