Management and Marketing System of Local Chicken in Boloso Sore Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Zekarias Batre
{"title":"Management and Marketing System of Local Chicken in Boloso Sore Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Zekarias Batre","doi":"10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted in Boloso Sore Woreda Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia to assess local chicken management and marketing system. A stratified random sampling technique was used to stratify the agro-ecological zones to select 6, 20 and 3 from (high lands (“Dega”), mid altitude (“Woyna dega”) and lowland (“Kola”) respectively. Fifteen households from each kebeles were selected purposively based on the intensity and experience of poultry production. The result of the study indicated that about 85.92 and 14.08% of the respondents were males and females headed respectively and about 82% were married. The average chicken holding per household was 3.79 heads. The chickens were kept for subsistence (home consumption), income generation and both for subsistence and income generation according to 19.25, 25.25 and 55.5% of the respondents respectively. Furthermore, the majorities (79.5%) of the respondents were kept their chickens in free scavenging system and majority did not supplement their birds before they go for scavenging. The common supplements used in chicken feeding were maize, wheat, kitchen wastes according the rank obtained from the respondents. Majority (79.5%) of the respondents provide water to their chicken free of choice. However, the respondents’ ranked shortage of feed was the first constraints challenging poultry production. Similarly, prevalence of disease, predators, lack of capital and veterinary service are the major constraints affecting their chicken production and productivity in the order of rank. Therefore, improved management technologies to overcome shortage of feed and disease control should be introduced in order to increase the productivity of the local chicken.","PeriodicalId":13830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"213-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study was conducted in Boloso Sore Woreda Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia to assess local chicken management and marketing system. A stratified random sampling technique was used to stratify the agro-ecological zones to select 6, 20 and 3 from (high lands (“Dega”), mid altitude (“Woyna dega”) and lowland (“Kola”) respectively. Fifteen households from each kebeles were selected purposively based on the intensity and experience of poultry production. The result of the study indicated that about 85.92 and 14.08% of the respondents were males and females headed respectively and about 82% were married. The average chicken holding per household was 3.79 heads. The chickens were kept for subsistence (home consumption), income generation and both for subsistence and income generation according to 19.25, 25.25 and 55.5% of the respondents respectively. Furthermore, the majorities (79.5%) of the respondents were kept their chickens in free scavenging system and majority did not supplement their birds before they go for scavenging. The common supplements used in chicken feeding were maize, wheat, kitchen wastes according the rank obtained from the respondents. Majority (79.5%) of the respondents provide water to their chicken free of choice. However, the respondents’ ranked shortage of feed was the first constraints challenging poultry production. Similarly, prevalence of disease, predators, lack of capital and veterinary service are the major constraints affecting their chicken production and productivity in the order of rank. Therefore, improved management technologies to overcome shortage of feed and disease control should be introduced in order to increase the productivity of the local chicken.
埃塞俄比亚南部Wolaita地区Boloso sorworeda地方鸡的管理和销售体系
该研究在埃塞俄比亚南部的Boloso soworeda Wolaita区进行,以评估当地的鸡肉管理和营销系统。采用分层随机抽样技术对农业生态区进行分层,分别从高原(“Dega”)、高原(“Woyna Dega”)和低地(“Kola”)中选择6个、20个和3个。根据家禽生产的强度和经验,有目的地从每个kebeles中选择15户。研究结果表明,受访者中男女户主分别占85.92%和14.08%,已婚人口占82%。每户平均养鸡量为3.79头。养鸡的目的分别为自给(家庭消费)、创收和既自给又创收,分别占应答者的19.25%、25.25%和55.5%。此外,大多数(79.5%)的受访者将鸡饲养在自由食腐系统中,大多数人在去食腐之前没有补充他们的鸡。根据调查对象的排名,鸡饲料中常见的添加物为玉米、小麦和厨余垃圾。大多数(79.5%)受访者自愿为鸡提供水。然而,答复者的饲料短缺排名是挑战家禽生产的首要制约因素。同样,疾病流行、捕食者、缺乏资金和兽医服务是影响其鸡肉生产和生产力的主要制约因素。因此,为了提高地方鸡的生产能力,应引进改进的管理技术来克服饲料短缺和疾病控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信