Review of Water Saturation Calculation Methods in Shale Gas Reservoir

Hongyan Yu, Xiaolong Wei, Zhenliang Wang, R. Rezaee, Yihuai Zhang, M. Lebedev, S. Iglauer
{"title":"Review of Water Saturation Calculation Methods in Shale Gas Reservoir","authors":"Hongyan Yu, Xiaolong Wei, Zhenliang Wang, R. Rezaee, Yihuai Zhang, M. Lebedev, S. Iglauer","doi":"10.2118/192115-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The gas content in shale reservoir is of great importance in reservoir evaluation. Shale reservoir has various gas including free gas, adsorpted gas and soluted gas. Free gas take an important part for the total gas content. Hence, we investigated three equations for water saturation calculating and compared and improved them based on theoretical analysis in order to find a siutable one for the shale reservoir characterization. The results indicate that the Archie formula has several limitations applied to complex pore structure, which leads to high water saturation. Since the Archie formula was proposed by experimental data in pure sandstone without enough consideration about the clay of shale reservoir. The Waxman-Smits is suitable to shale gas reservoirs through theoretical analysis, but there are several uncertain parameters. The conductivity of formation water is necessary parameter in calculation of formation water saturation, but calculating the conductivity of formation water is difficult in shale gas reservoir because of its intricate characterization of pore structure and conductivity. Waxman-Smits model take account for the clay conductivity, but there are several uncertain parameters which are hard to obtained, resuting high error. For instance, the equivalent conductivity of exchange cations (B) and the capacitance of exchange anions (Qv) can not be defined accurately relied on experimental calculation, which causes indefinite influence on results. Thus, we concluded that selecting the improved Indonesia equation is a better method to calculate water saturation. This study provided a comprehensive analysis and an accurate way for water satruartion evaluation in shale reservoir.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192115-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The gas content in shale reservoir is of great importance in reservoir evaluation. Shale reservoir has various gas including free gas, adsorpted gas and soluted gas. Free gas take an important part for the total gas content. Hence, we investigated three equations for water saturation calculating and compared and improved them based on theoretical analysis in order to find a siutable one for the shale reservoir characterization. The results indicate that the Archie formula has several limitations applied to complex pore structure, which leads to high water saturation. Since the Archie formula was proposed by experimental data in pure sandstone without enough consideration about the clay of shale reservoir. The Waxman-Smits is suitable to shale gas reservoirs through theoretical analysis, but there are several uncertain parameters. The conductivity of formation water is necessary parameter in calculation of formation water saturation, but calculating the conductivity of formation water is difficult in shale gas reservoir because of its intricate characterization of pore structure and conductivity. Waxman-Smits model take account for the clay conductivity, but there are several uncertain parameters which are hard to obtained, resuting high error. For instance, the equivalent conductivity of exchange cations (B) and the capacitance of exchange anions (Qv) can not be defined accurately relied on experimental calculation, which causes indefinite influence on results. Thus, we concluded that selecting the improved Indonesia equation is a better method to calculate water saturation. This study provided a comprehensive analysis and an accurate way for water satruartion evaluation in shale reservoir.
页岩气储层含水饱和度计算方法综述
页岩储层含气量在储层评价中具有重要意义。页岩储层含游离气、吸附气和溶解气等多种气体。游离气在总含气量中占有重要地位。为此,研究了3种含水饱和度计算公式,并在理论分析的基础上对其进行了比较和改进,以期找到适合页岩储层表征的含水饱和度计算公式。结果表明,对于复杂孔隙结构,Archie公式存在一定的局限性,导致含水饱和度较高。由于阿尔奇公式是根据纯砂岩的实验数据提出的,没有充分考虑页岩储层的粘土。理论分析表明,Waxman-Smits方法适用于页岩气储层,但存在一些不确定参数。地层水的导电性是计算地层含水饱和度的必要参数,但页岩气储层孔隙结构和导电性表征复杂,给地层水的导电性计算带来困难。Waxman-Smits模型考虑了粘土的电导率,但存在一些难以获得的不确定参数,误差较大。例如,交换阳离子的等效电导率(B)和交换阴离子的电容(Qv)不能依靠实验计算准确地定义,这对结果造成了不确定的影响。因此,我们认为选择改进的印度尼西亚方程是一种更好的计算含水饱和度的方法。该研究为页岩储层含水饱和度评价提供了全面的分析和准确的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信