Button Battery Injuries in the Pediatric Aerodigestive Tract

Abhinav R. Ettyreddy, Matthew W. Georg, David H. Chi, B. Gaines, J. Simons
{"title":"Button Battery Injuries in the Pediatric Aerodigestive Tract","authors":"Abhinav R. Ettyreddy, Matthew W. Georg, David H. Chi, B. Gaines, J. Simons","doi":"10.1177/014556131509401207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children with a button battery impaction present with nonspecific symptoms that may account for a delay in medical care. We conducted a retrospective study of the clinical presentation, management, and complications associated with button battery ingestion in the pediatric aerodigestive tract and to evaluate the associated long-term morbidity. We reviewed the medical records of 23 patients who were treated for button battery impaction at our tertiary care children's hospital from Jan. 1, 2000, through July 31, 2013. This population was made up of 14 boys and 9 girls, aged 7 days to 12 years (mean: 4 yr). Patients were divided into three groups based on the site of impaction; there were 9 impactions in the esophagus and 7 each in the nasal cavity and stomach. We compiled information on the type and size of each battery, the duration of the impaction, presenting symptoms, treatment, and outcomes. The mean duration of battery impaction was 40.6, 30.7, and 21.0 hours in the esophagus, nasal cavity, and stomach, respectively. We were able to identify the specific type of battery in 13 cases; 11 of these cases (85%) involved a 3-V20-mm lithium ion battery, including all cases of esophageal impaction in which the type of battery was identified. The most common presenting signs and symptoms were vomiting (n = 7 [30%]), difficulty feeding (n = 5 [22%]), cough (n = 5), and bloody nasal discharge (n = 5); none of the presenting signs and symptoms predicted the severity of the injury or the outcome. The median length of hospital stay was far greater in the esophageal group (12 days) than in the nasal and stomach groups (1 day each; p = 0.006). Battery impaction in the esophagus for more than 15 hours was associated with a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay than impaction for less than 15 hours (p = 0.04). Esophageal complications included strictures (n = 5), perforation (n = 3), and tracheoesophageal fistula formation (n = 2). Clinicians should consider battery impaction in the upper aerodigestive tract as an emergency that can lead to significant long-term morbidity, and therefore immediate surgical intervention is required.","PeriodicalId":11842,"journal":{"name":"ENT Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"486 - 493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENT Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131509401207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Children with a button battery impaction present with nonspecific symptoms that may account for a delay in medical care. We conducted a retrospective study of the clinical presentation, management, and complications associated with button battery ingestion in the pediatric aerodigestive tract and to evaluate the associated long-term morbidity. We reviewed the medical records of 23 patients who were treated for button battery impaction at our tertiary care children's hospital from Jan. 1, 2000, through July 31, 2013. This population was made up of 14 boys and 9 girls, aged 7 days to 12 years (mean: 4 yr). Patients were divided into three groups based on the site of impaction; there were 9 impactions in the esophagus and 7 each in the nasal cavity and stomach. We compiled information on the type and size of each battery, the duration of the impaction, presenting symptoms, treatment, and outcomes. The mean duration of battery impaction was 40.6, 30.7, and 21.0 hours in the esophagus, nasal cavity, and stomach, respectively. We were able to identify the specific type of battery in 13 cases; 11 of these cases (85%) involved a 3-V20-mm lithium ion battery, including all cases of esophageal impaction in which the type of battery was identified. The most common presenting signs and symptoms were vomiting (n = 7 [30%]), difficulty feeding (n = 5 [22%]), cough (n = 5), and bloody nasal discharge (n = 5); none of the presenting signs and symptoms predicted the severity of the injury or the outcome. The median length of hospital stay was far greater in the esophageal group (12 days) than in the nasal and stomach groups (1 day each; p = 0.006). Battery impaction in the esophagus for more than 15 hours was associated with a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay than impaction for less than 15 hours (p = 0.04). Esophageal complications included strictures (n = 5), perforation (n = 3), and tracheoesophageal fistula formation (n = 2). Clinicians should consider battery impaction in the upper aerodigestive tract as an emergency that can lead to significant long-term morbidity, and therefore immediate surgical intervention is required.
小儿呼吸道的纽扣电池损伤
钮扣电池嵌塞的儿童表现出非特异性症状,这可能导致医疗护理的延误。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,研究了儿科空气消化道误食纽扣电池的临床表现、处理和并发症,并评估了相关的长期发病率。我们回顾了从2000年1月1日至2013年7月31日在我们三级保健儿童医院因纽扣电池嵌塞治疗的23例患者的医疗记录。该人群由14名男孩和9名女孩组成,年龄从7天到12岁(平均4岁)。根据嵌塞部位将患者分为三组;食管嵌塞9例,鼻腔和胃嵌塞各7例。我们收集了每个电池的类型和大小、影响的持续时间、表现症状、治疗和结果的信息。电池嵌塞在食道、鼻腔和胃中的平均时间分别为40.6、30.7和21.0小时。我们能够在13个案例中识别出特定类型的电池;其中11例(85%)涉及3-V20-mm锂离子电池,包括所有确定电池类型的食管嵌塞病例。最常见的体征和症状是呕吐(n = 7[30%])、进食困难(n = 5[22%])、咳嗽(n = 5)和流鼻血(n = 5);所有的体征和症状都不能预测损伤的严重程度或结果。食管组的中位住院时间(12天)远高于鼻胃组(各1天);P = 0.006)。超过15小时的食管电池嵌塞与小于15小时的嵌塞相比,术后住院时间明显更长(p = 0.04)。食管并发症包括狭窄(n = 5)、穿孔(n = 3)和气管食管瘘形成(n = 2)。临床医生应考虑电池嵌塞在上气消化道作为一种紧急情况,可导致显著的长期发病率,因此需要立即手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信