Eucalyptus plantations affect fungal communities associated with leaf-litter decomposition in Iberian streams

Verónica Ferreira, A. Elosegi, V. Gulis, J. Pozo, M. Graça
{"title":"Eucalyptus plantations affect fungal communities associated with leaf-litter decomposition in Iberian streams","authors":"Verónica Ferreira, A. Elosegi, V. Gulis, J. Pozo, M. Graça","doi":"10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0166-0467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The replacement of diverse deciduous forests by eucalyptus plantations changes the timing, quality and quantity of litter inputs to streams, which has the potential to affect the activity of decomposers and thus ecosystem functioning. Here, we compared (a) the decomposition rate of alder and oak leaves incubated in deciduous and eucalyptus streams in Spain and Portugal, (b) the activity (fungal biomass and sporulation) and diversity (species richness and Pielou's evenness index) of the associated fungal communities and (c) changes in N and P content of leaves. Alder and oak leaves decomposed at similar rates in both stream types and countries, with the exception of oak leaves in the Spanish eucalyptus stream, which decomposed faster than in the corresponding deciduous stream or in the Portuguese eucalyptus stream. This difference was attributed to physical fragmentation due to flooding and not to forest cover. Higher nitrogen and phosphorus content and higher fungal biomass and sporulation were generally found on leaves from eucalyptus rather than from deciduous streams. The higher fungal activity in eucalyptus streams was attributed to higher water temperature and benthic organic matter storage. The Spanish eucalyptus stream had higher species richness of aquatic hyphomycetes than the deciduous one (27 vs. 20) while in Portugal the opposite was true (16 vs. 20). Fungal community evenness was significantly higher on alder leaves in eucalyptus than in deciduous streams. The community structure (MDS analysis) discriminated both stream types in Portugal much better than it did in Spain. At least for Portugal, differences between stream types can be explained by higher litter diversity in deciduous than in eucalyptus streams. In conclusion, stream fungal communities in Portugal were more affected by eucalyptus plantations than in Spain. In both countries, fungal diversity and activity were more affected by eucalyptus plantations than decomposition rates of submerged litter. We suggest therefore that, to mitigate the effect of eucalyptus plantations, deciduous trees could be planted on the river banks or, preferably, riparian strips of native vegetation should be left unmodified.","PeriodicalId":8118,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0166-0467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

The replacement of diverse deciduous forests by eucalyptus plantations changes the timing, quality and quantity of litter inputs to streams, which has the potential to affect the activity of decomposers and thus ecosystem functioning. Here, we compared (a) the decomposition rate of alder and oak leaves incubated in deciduous and eucalyptus streams in Spain and Portugal, (b) the activity (fungal biomass and sporulation) and diversity (species richness and Pielou's evenness index) of the associated fungal communities and (c) changes in N and P content of leaves. Alder and oak leaves decomposed at similar rates in both stream types and countries, with the exception of oak leaves in the Spanish eucalyptus stream, which decomposed faster than in the corresponding deciduous stream or in the Portuguese eucalyptus stream. This difference was attributed to physical fragmentation due to flooding and not to forest cover. Higher nitrogen and phosphorus content and higher fungal biomass and sporulation were generally found on leaves from eucalyptus rather than from deciduous streams. The higher fungal activity in eucalyptus streams was attributed to higher water temperature and benthic organic matter storage. The Spanish eucalyptus stream had higher species richness of aquatic hyphomycetes than the deciduous one (27 vs. 20) while in Portugal the opposite was true (16 vs. 20). Fungal community evenness was significantly higher on alder leaves in eucalyptus than in deciduous streams. The community structure (MDS analysis) discriminated both stream types in Portugal much better than it did in Spain. At least for Portugal, differences between stream types can be explained by higher litter diversity in deciduous than in eucalyptus streams. In conclusion, stream fungal communities in Portugal were more affected by eucalyptus plantations than in Spain. In both countries, fungal diversity and activity were more affected by eucalyptus plantations than decomposition rates of submerged litter. We suggest therefore that, to mitigate the effect of eucalyptus plantations, deciduous trees could be planted on the river banks or, preferably, riparian strips of native vegetation should be left unmodified.
桉树人工林影响伊比利亚溪流中与凋落叶分解相关的真菌群落
桉树人工林对各种落叶林的替代改变了向溪流输入凋落物的时间、质量和数量,这有可能影响分解者的活动,从而影响生态系统的功能。在这里,我们比较了(a)在西班牙和葡萄牙的落叶和桉树溪流中孵育的桤木和栎树叶片的分解速率,(b)相关真菌群落的活性(真菌生物量和孢子量)和多样性(物种丰富度和Pielou均匀指数),以及(c)叶片N和P含量的变化。在两种河流类型和国家中,桤木和橡树叶的分解速度相似,除了西班牙桉树溪流中的橡树叶,其分解速度比相应的落叶溪流或葡萄牙桉树溪流快。这种差异归因于洪水造成的物理破碎,而不是森林覆盖。桉树叶片的氮、磷含量、真菌生物量和孢子量均高于落叶溪流。桉树溪流中较高的真菌活性归因于较高的水温和底栖有机物储存量。西班牙桉树溪流的水生菌丝种类丰富度高于落叶溪流(27比20),而葡萄牙则相反(16比20)。桉树桤木叶片真菌群落均匀度显著高于落叶溪流。社区结构(MDS分析)在葡萄牙比在西班牙更好地区分两种流类型。至少在葡萄牙,溪流类型之间的差异可以用落叶的凋落物多样性高于桉树的凋落物多样性来解释。综上所述,桉树人工林对葡萄牙河流真菌群落的影响大于西班牙。在这两个国家,桉树人工林对真菌多样性和活性的影响大于淹没凋落物的分解率。因此,我们建议,为了减轻桉树人工林的影响,可以在河岸种植落叶树,或者最好保持原生植被的河岸带不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信