Quality of Life in Women after Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section in Armenia

G. N.
{"title":"Quality of Life in Women after Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section in Armenia","authors":"G. N.","doi":"10.33425/2689-1085.1028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The postpartum period is attended by numerous variations in women's health and quality of life. These alterations can affect the health of mothers and children. Considering the importance of postnatal quality of life and its different contributing factors, this study aimed to compare women’s quality of life after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Aim: This study was aimed to assess the relationship between mode of birth and quality of life for women's health during the postpartum period. Methods: The study was conducted at the Erebouni medical center of Armenia. The participants’ quality of life was examined, using Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, evaluating three periods of time including 3, 6 and 12 months after delivery (either vaginal or cesarean delivery). Data were analyzed using t-test. Questions were about pain intensity, frequency, and location, as well as medical treatment and impact on daily living. Study design: A descriptive study design was used in the current study. Study sample: A total of 100 women attended the outpatient clinic using a purposive sample. Data collection Tools: The data have been collected a structured interview questionnaire and a SF-36 form in order to assess the women`s life quality used a purposive sample method. The study carried out from May 2020 to June 2021. Results: The mean age of women was 26.3 ± 2.2 years and 26.3 ± 7.51 years of the caesarean and vaginal birth group, respectively. Quality of life was significantly higher in women with vaginal delivery, compared to women with cesarean section in all periods including three months (93.7 ± 11.2 vs. 50.4 ± 12.7), six months (94.2 ± 14.5 vs. 65.1 ± 12.3), and one year (106.9 ± 10.5 vs. 63.9 ± 9.6) after delivery. Conclusion & Recommendation: According to the study results, the vaginal birth group had higher scores of SF36 compared to caesarean delivery. Thus, vaginal birth is the safe and less expensive option choice for mothers and their family, if there were no indications of caesarean delivery.","PeriodicalId":75037,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of pediatrics and neonatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of pediatrics and neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2689-1085.1028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postpartum period is attended by numerous variations in women's health and quality of life. These alterations can affect the health of mothers and children. Considering the importance of postnatal quality of life and its different contributing factors, this study aimed to compare women’s quality of life after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Aim: This study was aimed to assess the relationship between mode of birth and quality of life for women's health during the postpartum period. Methods: The study was conducted at the Erebouni medical center of Armenia. The participants’ quality of life was examined, using Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, evaluating three periods of time including 3, 6 and 12 months after delivery (either vaginal or cesarean delivery). Data were analyzed using t-test. Questions were about pain intensity, frequency, and location, as well as medical treatment and impact on daily living. Study design: A descriptive study design was used in the current study. Study sample: A total of 100 women attended the outpatient clinic using a purposive sample. Data collection Tools: The data have been collected a structured interview questionnaire and a SF-36 form in order to assess the women`s life quality used a purposive sample method. The study carried out from May 2020 to June 2021. Results: The mean age of women was 26.3 ± 2.2 years and 26.3 ± 7.51 years of the caesarean and vaginal birth group, respectively. Quality of life was significantly higher in women with vaginal delivery, compared to women with cesarean section in all periods including three months (93.7 ± 11.2 vs. 50.4 ± 12.7), six months (94.2 ± 14.5 vs. 65.1 ± 12.3), and one year (106.9 ± 10.5 vs. 63.9 ± 9.6) after delivery. Conclusion & Recommendation: According to the study results, the vaginal birth group had higher scores of SF36 compared to caesarean delivery. Thus, vaginal birth is the safe and less expensive option choice for mothers and their family, if there were no indications of caesarean delivery.
亚美尼亚妇女阴道分娩和剖宫产后的生活质量
背景:产后期间妇女的健康和生活质量有许多变化。这些改变会影响母亲和儿童的健康。考虑到产后生活质量的重要性及其影响因素,本研究旨在比较阴道分娩和剖宫产后妇女的生活质量。目的:本研究旨在评估分娩方式与产后妇女健康生活质量之间的关系。方法:本研究在亚美尼亚Erebouni医学中心进行。采用SF-36问卷,对分娩后(阴道分娩或剖宫产)3个月、6个月和12个月三个时间段进行生活质量评估。数据分析采用t检验。问题是关于疼痛的强度、频率和位置,以及治疗和对日常生活的影响。研究设计:本研究采用描述性研究设计。研究样本:共有100名妇女参加门诊诊所使用目的样本。数据收集工具:数据收集采用结构化访谈问卷和SF-36表格,采用目的抽样法对女性的生活质量进行评估。该研究于2020年5月至2021年6月进行。结果:剖宫产组和顺产组产妇平均年龄分别为26.3±2.2岁和26.3±7.51岁。在分娩后3个月(93.7±11.2比50.4±12.7)、6个月(94.2±14.5比65.1±12.3)和1年(106.9±10.5比63.9±9.6),阴道分娩妇女的生活质量均明显高于剖宫产妇女。结论与建议:根据研究结果,顺产组SF36评分高于剖腹产组。因此,如果没有剖腹产的迹象,阴道分娩对母亲和她们的家庭来说是安全且更便宜的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信