K. Karthikeyan, D. Kanagaraj, V. Karthikeyan, Sivasankaran Devandiran
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice of health-care ethics among doctors in Tamil Nadu - A cross-sectional study","authors":"K. Karthikeyan, D. Kanagaraj, V. Karthikeyan, Sivasankaran Devandiran","doi":"10.5455/ijmsph.2020.0506823052020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Proficiency in medical ethics is central to valuable patient care. The current medical education gives limited help in dealing with the ethical dilemmas. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health-care ethics among doctors in Tamil Nadu. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study covering all doctors on payroll (171) as on August 1, 2018, was carried out in August 2018 at Government Tiruvannamalai Medical College. A total of 165 doctors were contacted and 148 questionnaires were collected back. The pre-tested questionnaire comprised 44 questions. Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained. SPSS version 22 was used to analyze data. Association between sociodemographic variables and attitude, practice of the doctors toward the health-care ethics was compared using Chi-square test. Results: About 87.8% of respondents were aware of the definition of health-care ethics. About 78.4% of respondents knew the duties of ethical committee. Books and journals were the source of knowledge for 66.2% of respondents. About 52% of the respondents preferred to consult their guide/head of department when they faced an ethical/legal issue. Nearly 60% were aware of existence of ethical committee. About 62.2% of the respondents had positive attitude toward health-care ethics. About 69% of the respondents had good practice of health-care ethics. Age group, sex, specialty, and duration of work experience had no significant association with attitude toward health-care ethics. Age group had significant correlation with practice while sex, specialty, and duration of work experience did not. Conclusion: Nine-tenth of respondents were aware of the definition of health-care ethics. Three-fourth was aware of duties of ethical committee. Nearly two-third of the respondents had positive attitude toward health-care ethics. More than two-third of the respondents had good practice of health-care ethics.","PeriodicalId":14153,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2020.0506823052020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Proficiency in medical ethics is central to valuable patient care. The current medical education gives limited help in dealing with the ethical dilemmas. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health-care ethics among doctors in Tamil Nadu. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study covering all doctors on payroll (171) as on August 1, 2018, was carried out in August 2018 at Government Tiruvannamalai Medical College. A total of 165 doctors were contacted and 148 questionnaires were collected back. The pre-tested questionnaire comprised 44 questions. Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained. SPSS version 22 was used to analyze data. Association between sociodemographic variables and attitude, practice of the doctors toward the health-care ethics was compared using Chi-square test. Results: About 87.8% of respondents were aware of the definition of health-care ethics. About 78.4% of respondents knew the duties of ethical committee. Books and journals were the source of knowledge for 66.2% of respondents. About 52% of the respondents preferred to consult their guide/head of department when they faced an ethical/legal issue. Nearly 60% were aware of existence of ethical committee. About 62.2% of the respondents had positive attitude toward health-care ethics. About 69% of the respondents had good practice of health-care ethics. Age group, sex, specialty, and duration of work experience had no significant association with attitude toward health-care ethics. Age group had significant correlation with practice while sex, specialty, and duration of work experience did not. Conclusion: Nine-tenth of respondents were aware of the definition of health-care ethics. Three-fourth was aware of duties of ethical committee. Nearly two-third of the respondents had positive attitude toward health-care ethics. More than two-third of the respondents had good practice of health-care ethics.
背景:精通医学伦理是有价值的病人护理的核心。当前的医学教育对处理伦理困境的帮助有限。目的:本研究的目的是评估泰米尔纳德邦医生的卫生保健伦理知识、态度和实践。材料与方法:一项基于问卷的横断面研究于2018年8月在Tiruvannamalai政府医学院进行,涵盖截至2018年8月1日所有在职医生(171名)。共联系165名医生,回收问卷148份。预测问卷包含44个问题。已获得机构伦理委员会的批准。采用SPSS version 22进行数据分析。采用卡方检验比较社会人口学变量与医生卫生伦理态度、实践的相关性。结果:87.8%的被调查者了解卫生保健伦理的定义。约78.4%的受访者知道伦理委员会的职责。66.2%的受访者认为书籍和期刊是知识的来源。约52%的受访者在遇到道德/法律问题时,倾向于咨询他们的导游/部门主管。近60%的人知道道德委员会的存在。62.2%的受访者对医疗卫生伦理持积极态度。约69%的应答者有良好的保健道德实践。年龄、性别、专业、工作经验与卫生保健伦理态度无显著相关。年龄与实习有显著的相关性,而性别、专业、工作时间与实习无显著的相关性。结论:十分之九的答复者知道保健伦理的定义。四分之三的人知道道德委员会的职责。近三分之二的受访者对卫生保健伦理持积极态度。超过三分之二的答复者有良好的保健道德实践。