Neglected percutaneous rod extrusion following posterior occipitocervical instrumentation: a case report

Reinhold Maximilian, Bonacker Johannes, Driesen Tobias, Lehmann Wolfgang
{"title":"Neglected percutaneous rod extrusion following posterior occipitocervical instrumentation: a case report","authors":"Reinhold Maximilian, Bonacker Johannes, Driesen Tobias, Lehmann Wolfgang","doi":"10.29328/journal.acr.1001063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The extrusion of implant material is a rare complication but has been reported in several cases following anterior cervical spine surgery. A posterior spontaneous percutaneous rod extrusion after rigid occipitocervical (OC) instrumentation (screw and rod construct) has not been reported yet. The authors discuss potential complications after cervical spine surgery and its clinical management. Methods: This is a case report of a 56-year-old patient after posterior OC spine surgery with initially unobserved implant failure and posterior percutaneous rod extrusion. The implant failure with a missing rod has been documented 4 years later during a routine follow-up visit. Results: At the four-year follow-up, the asymptomatic patient presented with a stable occipitocervical junction and an improved range of motion after generalized sepsis with an epidural spinal abscess, decompression and posterior OC instrumentation. A computed tomography scan of the implant failure of a broken rod was noticed two years postoperatively. The patient failed to return to the clinic. For years postoperatively he returned to the clinic and the broken rod could not be detectable in-situ on the X-rays anymore. Conclusion: The posterior percutaneous rod extrusion following an OC instrumentation not noticed by the patient, is a very rare complication that has not been described in the literature yet. Once seen back in the clinic, the patient unexpectedly reported an improved ROM without neck pain. Usually, revision surgery or implant removal is recommended if an implant failure is documented.","PeriodicalId":92875,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical case reports","volume":"563 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.acr.1001063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The extrusion of implant material is a rare complication but has been reported in several cases following anterior cervical spine surgery. A posterior spontaneous percutaneous rod extrusion after rigid occipitocervical (OC) instrumentation (screw and rod construct) has not been reported yet. The authors discuss potential complications after cervical spine surgery and its clinical management. Methods: This is a case report of a 56-year-old patient after posterior OC spine surgery with initially unobserved implant failure and posterior percutaneous rod extrusion. The implant failure with a missing rod has been documented 4 years later during a routine follow-up visit. Results: At the four-year follow-up, the asymptomatic patient presented with a stable occipitocervical junction and an improved range of motion after generalized sepsis with an epidural spinal abscess, decompression and posterior OC instrumentation. A computed tomography scan of the implant failure of a broken rod was noticed two years postoperatively. The patient failed to return to the clinic. For years postoperatively he returned to the clinic and the broken rod could not be detectable in-situ on the X-rays anymore. Conclusion: The posterior percutaneous rod extrusion following an OC instrumentation not noticed by the patient, is a very rare complication that has not been described in the literature yet. Once seen back in the clinic, the patient unexpectedly reported an improved ROM without neck pain. Usually, revision surgery or implant removal is recommended if an implant failure is documented.
后枕颈内固定后被忽视的经皮棒挤压:1例报告
目的:植体材料的挤压是一种罕见的并发症,但已经报道了几例颈椎前路手术后的病例。在刚性枕颈(OC)内固定(螺钉和棒结构)后,后路自发经皮棒挤压尚未报道。作者讨论了颈椎手术后可能出现的并发症及其临床处理。方法:这是一个56岁的患者后路OC脊柱手术后,最初未观察到植入物失败和后路经皮棒挤压的病例报告。在4年后的常规随访中记录了植入物失败并缺失棒。结果:在四年的随访中,无症状患者在伴硬膜外脊髓脓肿的全身性脓毒症、减压和后路OC内固定后出现了稳定的枕颈交界和改善的活动范围。术后2年的计算机断层扫描发现了一根断棒的植入失败。病人没有再回到诊所。手术后数年,他回到诊所,在x光片上再也无法检测到断裂的杆子。结论:患者未注意到的颈动脉内固定后经皮后棒挤压是一种非常罕见的并发症,尚未在文献中描述。一旦回到诊所,病人意外地报告了改善的ROM没有颈部疼痛。通常,如果证实种植体失败,建议进行翻修手术或移除种植体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信