Well Design Advancement – Engineering Solutions to Overcome Risks and Challenges in Drilling Risky Thermal Filed in North of Oman

Qasim Rawahi, H. Rashdi
{"title":"Well Design Advancement – Engineering Solutions to Overcome Risks and Challenges in Drilling Risky Thermal Filed in North of Oman","authors":"Qasim Rawahi, H. Rashdi","doi":"10.2118/200268-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses how re-designing the well is driving the performance and maximizing the well life considering all risks and challenges associated with drilling in Oman thermal Q fields that required further engineering solutions and in-depth simulation and analysis. Managing the risk and delivering wells safely in the most competitive and economical approach are most critical value drivers of these wells. Main risks in Q field are shallow gas, high level of H2s, highly fractured formation, drilling in total losses scenario with ERD wells profile, managing high reactive shale, cement bond quality and critical zonal isolation requirement. It also reflects the unique well control approach in managing gas cap risk with total losses scenario.\n Collecting the data and list all risks and challenges associated with drilling operation to identify the functionality and other enablers was the most critical step in evaluating what givens and opportunities are. Then, utilizing well plan landmark and other simulation tools to simulate torque and drag, shock and vibration, hydraulics and hole cleaning to optimize the design of the well profile and BHA configurations. Consequently, re-designing the well and proposed the most suitable and fit for purpose design along with different loads and stress checks utilizing wellcat tool. Real-time data utilized during the execution phase to maximize drilling efficiency and design effectiveness. Finally, the well delivered assessed against its critical function requirements like minimum zonal isolation between different reservoirs and well integrity.\n By proposing engineering solutions and design optimization, utilizing both frontend simulation and past filed best practices, all Q field wells delivered safely with required quality within its budget and time frame. All challenges and risks have been overcome and managed to deliver the project efficiently like torque and drag, hole cleaning, shock and vibration, and back-reaming. Also landing criteria and drilling parameters have been developed to avoid losses while landing the well in a highly depleted reservoir and manage the threat of getting well control scenario. Furthermore, in the execution phase, real-time data monitored to enhance the efficiency and drilling parameters were optimized to keep them within the planned operating envelope. As the design focused on long-term well integrity and longevity, further evaluation post well delivery curried out to check the zonal isolation with positive results that reflect healthy well integrity and fulfillment all functional requirement.\n This paper reflects the complexity and unique approach in managing well control risk with dynamic kill procedure (Natih procedure) while drilling gas cap in highly fractured formation associated with concertation of H2S gas. Also, it is echoing the importance of advance engineering analysis and solutions in delivering the high ERD ratio wells with their challenges and risk profile. As well it is emphasizing on the need of reviewing the standardized well design within development fields due to the changing in subsurface parameters and drilling strategies.","PeriodicalId":11113,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 21, 2022","volume":"328 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 21, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200268-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses how re-designing the well is driving the performance and maximizing the well life considering all risks and challenges associated with drilling in Oman thermal Q fields that required further engineering solutions and in-depth simulation and analysis. Managing the risk and delivering wells safely in the most competitive and economical approach are most critical value drivers of these wells. Main risks in Q field are shallow gas, high level of H2s, highly fractured formation, drilling in total losses scenario with ERD wells profile, managing high reactive shale, cement bond quality and critical zonal isolation requirement. It also reflects the unique well control approach in managing gas cap risk with total losses scenario. Collecting the data and list all risks and challenges associated with drilling operation to identify the functionality and other enablers was the most critical step in evaluating what givens and opportunities are. Then, utilizing well plan landmark and other simulation tools to simulate torque and drag, shock and vibration, hydraulics and hole cleaning to optimize the design of the well profile and BHA configurations. Consequently, re-designing the well and proposed the most suitable and fit for purpose design along with different loads and stress checks utilizing wellcat tool. Real-time data utilized during the execution phase to maximize drilling efficiency and design effectiveness. Finally, the well delivered assessed against its critical function requirements like minimum zonal isolation between different reservoirs and well integrity. By proposing engineering solutions and design optimization, utilizing both frontend simulation and past filed best practices, all Q field wells delivered safely with required quality within its budget and time frame. All challenges and risks have been overcome and managed to deliver the project efficiently like torque and drag, hole cleaning, shock and vibration, and back-reaming. Also landing criteria and drilling parameters have been developed to avoid losses while landing the well in a highly depleted reservoir and manage the threat of getting well control scenario. Furthermore, in the execution phase, real-time data monitored to enhance the efficiency and drilling parameters were optimized to keep them within the planned operating envelope. As the design focused on long-term well integrity and longevity, further evaluation post well delivery curried out to check the zonal isolation with positive results that reflect healthy well integrity and fulfillment all functional requirement. This paper reflects the complexity and unique approach in managing well control risk with dynamic kill procedure (Natih procedure) while drilling gas cap in highly fractured formation associated with concertation of H2S gas. Also, it is echoing the importance of advance engineering analysis and solutions in delivering the high ERD ratio wells with their challenges and risk profile. As well it is emphasizing on the need of reviewing the standardized well design within development fields due to the changing in subsurface parameters and drilling strategies.
油井设计的进步:工程解决方案克服了阿曼北部高风险热油气田钻井的风险和挑战
考虑到在阿曼热Q油田钻井所面临的所有风险和挑战,需要进一步的工程解决方案和深入的模拟和分析,本文讨论了如何重新设计井以提高性能并最大限度地延长井寿命。以最具竞争力和最经济的方式管理风险和安全交付井是这些井最关键的价值驱动因素。Q油田的主要风险是浅层气、高含硫化氢、高裂缝性地层、ERD井剖面全漏失钻井、管理高活性页岩、胶结质量和关键层间隔离要求。它还反映了在完全损失情况下管理气顶风险的独特井控方法。收集数据并列出与钻井作业相关的所有风险和挑战,以确定功能和其他推动因素,这是评估机遇的最关键步骤。然后,利用井平面图和其他仿真工具来模拟扭矩和阻力、冲击和振动、水力学和井眼清洗,以优化井型和BHA配置的设计。因此,对井进行了重新设计,提出了最适合的设计方案,并利用wellcat工具进行了不同的载荷和应力校核。在执行阶段利用实时数据,最大限度地提高钻井效率和设计效率。最后,根据不同储层之间的最小层间隔离和井的完整性等关键功能要求对交付的井进行评估。通过提出工程解决方案和设计优化,利用前端模拟和过去的油田最佳实践,所有Q油田的井都在预算和时间框架内安全交付了所需的质量。所有的挑战和风险都被克服并有效地交付了项目,如扭矩和阻力、井眼清洗、冲击和振动以及后扩眼。此外,还制定了着陆标准和钻井参数,以避免在高度枯竭的油藏中着陆时的损失,并管理井控场景的威胁。此外,在执行阶段,实时监测数据以提高效率,优化钻井参数,使其保持在计划的作业范围内。由于设计的重点是井的长期完整性和使用寿命,因此在投井后进行了进一步的评估,以检查层间隔离,结果表明井的完整性良好,满足了所有功能要求。这篇论文反映了在高裂缝性地层中与H2S气体聚集有关的气顶钻井过程中,动态压井程序(Natih程序)控制井控风险的复杂性和独特方法。此外,它也反映了先进的工程分析和解决方案在高ERD比井的挑战和风险方面的重要性。此外,由于地下参数和钻井策略的变化,它还强调了对开发油田标准化井设计进行审查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信