Intra-rater reliability of pressure pain threshold using a digital algometer

Rosana Tieka Miyazaki Branucci, Vanda de Lelis, Georgia Kleinschmitt Westenhofen, I. Fortini, M. F. Peres
{"title":"Intra-rater reliability of pressure pain threshold using a digital algometer","authors":"Rosana Tieka Miyazaki Branucci, Vanda de Lelis, Georgia Kleinschmitt Westenhofen, I. Fortini, M. F. Peres","doi":"10.48208/headachemed.2022.supplement.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) has been the main sensory modality studied in headache disorders. It is usually repetitive, leading to potential variability between measurements. Since threshold estimation relies on the observer, patient, body site, and the device used, it is important to assess measurement reliability in the specific clinical and methodological scenario to be studied in order to minimize error.\nObjectiveThe aim of this study is to confirm intra-rater reliability of PPT in the head of adults using a digital algometer device.\nMethodsPPT was measured with a digital algometer in 3 consecutive assessments conducted 10 min apart. Eight sites were measured in each time at the occipital, temporal and masseter regions bilaterally, frontal and vertex at midline. The reliability using intra-class variability (ICC) and covariance were calculated between times 1, 2, 3, and all times versus the mean. Scores above 0,75 were considered as having excellent reliability.\nResultsTen healthy volunteers aged (21-55) were studied. The sum of all sites measured in the head was 2182 (+-672) KPa for the first measure, 2085 (+- 626) KPa for the second, 2185 (+-685) for the third, and 2150 (+-685) KPa for the mean. All ICC coefficients calculated were 0,975 or higher in all areas.\nConclusionsWe concluded that one PPT measure in the head with a digital algometer is as reliable as 3 repetitive measures The intra-rater reliability for PPT is considered excellent. Future studies assessing pain vulnerability or predicting headache occurrence can be performed without a significant risk of bias.\nKeywords: Pressure PainThreshold, Algometry, Reliability, Intra-class.","PeriodicalId":12925,"journal":{"name":"Headache Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48208/headachemed.2022.supplement.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) has been the main sensory modality studied in headache disorders. It is usually repetitive, leading to potential variability between measurements. Since threshold estimation relies on the observer, patient, body site, and the device used, it is important to assess measurement reliability in the specific clinical and methodological scenario to be studied in order to minimize error. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to confirm intra-rater reliability of PPT in the head of adults using a digital algometer device. MethodsPPT was measured with a digital algometer in 3 consecutive assessments conducted 10 min apart. Eight sites were measured in each time at the occipital, temporal and masseter regions bilaterally, frontal and vertex at midline. The reliability using intra-class variability (ICC) and covariance were calculated between times 1, 2, 3, and all times versus the mean. Scores above 0,75 were considered as having excellent reliability. ResultsTen healthy volunteers aged (21-55) were studied. The sum of all sites measured in the head was 2182 (+-672) KPa for the first measure, 2085 (+- 626) KPa for the second, 2185 (+-685) for the third, and 2150 (+-685) KPa for the mean. All ICC coefficients calculated were 0,975 or higher in all areas. ConclusionsWe concluded that one PPT measure in the head with a digital algometer is as reliable as 3 repetitive measures The intra-rater reliability for PPT is considered excellent. Future studies assessing pain vulnerability or predicting headache occurrence can be performed without a significant risk of bias. Keywords: Pressure PainThreshold, Algometry, Reliability, Intra-class.
使用数字算法测量压力疼痛阈值的内部可靠性
背景压力疼痛阈值(PPT)一直是研究头痛疾病的主要感觉方式。它通常是重复的,导致测量之间的潜在可变性。由于阈值估计依赖于观察者、患者、身体部位和所使用的设备,因此评估要研究的特定临床和方法学场景的测量可靠性是很重要的,以尽量减少误差。目的利用数字测量仪,验证成人头部PPT的评分内可靠性。方法采用数字算法连续3次测量sppt,每隔10 min测量一次。每次测量双侧枕区、颞区、咬肌区、额部和正中顶点8个部位。使用类内变异性(ICC)和协方差计算在第1、2、3次和所有时间相对于平均值的信度。得分高于0.75分被认为具有优异的信度。结果选取21 ~ 55岁健康志愿者10例。第一次测量的所有位置之和为2182 (+-672)KPa,第二次测量为2085 (+- 626)KPa,第三次测量为2185 (+-685)KPa,平均值为2150 (+-685)KPa。所有地区计算的ICC系数均为0.975或更高。结论使用数字算法对头部进行一次PPT测量的可靠性与3次重复测量的可靠性相当,PPT的内部可靠性被认为是优秀的。未来评估疼痛易感性或预测头痛发生的研究可以在没有显著偏倚风险的情况下进行。关键词:压痛阈值,算法,可靠性,类内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信