A comparative study of WHO and WHEN prediction approaches for early identification of university students at dropout risk

Daniel A. Gutierrez-Pachas, Germain Garcia Zanabria, A. Cuadros-Vargas, Guillermo Cámara Chávez, Jorge Poco, Erick Gomez Nieto
{"title":"A comparative study of WHO and WHEN prediction approaches for early identification of university students at dropout risk","authors":"Daniel A. Gutierrez-Pachas, Germain Garcia Zanabria, A. Cuadros-Vargas, Guillermo Cámara Chávez, Jorge Poco, Erick Gomez Nieto","doi":"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing the students' dropout is one of the biggest challenges faced by educational institutions, especially in underdeveloped countries. Identification of the student with the highest risk of dropping out is generally used to apply corrective actions (WHO). Therefore, it is also important to determine WHEN a student will drop out, which is fundamental to planning preventive actions. In this work, we perform a study to quantitatively compare several approaches to address the early identification of dropout students in universities. We categorize our study into three main methods families, i.e., analytical methods, traditional classification methods, and probabilistic methods. The first is exploited at preprocessing step for selecting significant variables into the dropout identification task. The second uses machine learning models to classify students into dropout prone or non-dropout prone classes. The third family uses survival models to determine when the student would desert. To evaluate the predictive capacity of the classification models, the Kappa coefficient was incorporated into the usual machine learning metrics and shows that Kappa is handy for evaluating performance in unbalanced data. Similarly, in the survival models, the concordance index was applied to evaluate the predictive capacity. Our approach was applied over a real data set of Peruvian university graduate students to identify when and who will drop out.","PeriodicalId":6803,"journal":{"name":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"32 Sup5 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reducing the students' dropout is one of the biggest challenges faced by educational institutions, especially in underdeveloped countries. Identification of the student with the highest risk of dropping out is generally used to apply corrective actions (WHO). Therefore, it is also important to determine WHEN a student will drop out, which is fundamental to planning preventive actions. In this work, we perform a study to quantitatively compare several approaches to address the early identification of dropout students in universities. We categorize our study into three main methods families, i.e., analytical methods, traditional classification methods, and probabilistic methods. The first is exploited at preprocessing step for selecting significant variables into the dropout identification task. The second uses machine learning models to classify students into dropout prone or non-dropout prone classes. The third family uses survival models to determine when the student would desert. To evaluate the predictive capacity of the classification models, the Kappa coefficient was incorporated into the usual machine learning metrics and shows that Kappa is handy for evaluating performance in unbalanced data. Similarly, in the survival models, the concordance index was applied to evaluate the predictive capacity. Our approach was applied over a real data set of Peruvian university graduate students to identify when and who will drop out.
WHO与WHEN预测方法早期识别大学生辍学风险的比较研究
减少学生的辍学是教育机构面临的最大挑战之一,特别是在欠发达国家。确定退学风险最高的学生通常用于实施纠正措施(世卫组织)。因此,确定学生何时退学也很重要,这是计划预防措施的基础。在这项工作中,我们进行了一项研究,以定量比较几种方法来解决大学辍学学生的早期识别问题。我们将我们的研究分为三个主要的方法家族,即分析方法、传统分类方法和概率方法。第一个是在预处理步骤中用于选择dropout识别任务中的重要变量。第二种方法是使用机器学习模型将学生分为容易辍学或不容易辍学的班级。第三个家庭使用生存模型来确定学生何时会离开。为了评估分类模型的预测能力,Kappa系数被纳入到通常的机器学习指标中,并表明Kappa有助于评估不平衡数据中的性能。同样,在生存模型中,采用一致性指数来评估预测能力。我们的方法应用于秘鲁大学研究生的真实数据集,以确定何时以及谁将辍学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信