Observance of Patients’ Rights by Physicians and Operating Room Technicians

Mahsa Hazaryan, Masoome Salehi Kamboo, F. Mirzaeipour, Raziyeh Maasoumi
{"title":"Observance of Patients’ Rights by Physicians and Operating Room Technicians","authors":"Mahsa Hazaryan, Masoome Salehi Kamboo, F. Mirzaeipour, Raziyeh Maasoumi","doi":"10.5812/msnj.123316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients’ rights refer to specific legal privileges related to physical, psychological, spiritual, and social needs that have been reflected in the form of medical standards, rules, and regulations, and the health system and medical staff are responsible for their observance. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the observance of patients’ rights by physicians (surgeons and anesthesiologists) and technicians (anesthetists and operating room technicians). Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 142 operating room technicians and physicians working in hospitals affiliated with Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences in 2018. The participants were selected using stratified random sampling. The patient rights observation checklist was completed by indirect observation of the participants’ performance, and the data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 using the chi-square test and independent samples t-test. Results: The mean scores for the extent to which patients’ rights were observed by all technicians and all physicians were 69.7 ± 10.5 and 57.17 ± 11.7, respectively. The corresponding values were 65.15 ± 9.36 and 54.27 ± 11.24 for the anesthesiologists and surgeons and 84.16 ± 7.31 and 66.63 ± 8.23 for the anesthetists and operating room technicians, respectively. The patients’ rights observance scores were significantly higher for the anesthetists than for the operating room technicians (P = 0.001) and higher for the anesthesiologists than for the surgeons (P = 0.005). Conclusions: This study indicated that although anesthesiologists and anesthetists observed patients’ rights more than operating room technicians and surgeons, the observance of patients’ rights in the operating room was generally moderate. Thus, it is essential to hold refresher courses in medical ethics and patient rights for medical staff.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj.123316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patients’ rights refer to specific legal privileges related to physical, psychological, spiritual, and social needs that have been reflected in the form of medical standards, rules, and regulations, and the health system and medical staff are responsible for their observance. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the observance of patients’ rights by physicians (surgeons and anesthesiologists) and technicians (anesthetists and operating room technicians). Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 142 operating room technicians and physicians working in hospitals affiliated with Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences in 2018. The participants were selected using stratified random sampling. The patient rights observation checklist was completed by indirect observation of the participants’ performance, and the data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 using the chi-square test and independent samples t-test. Results: The mean scores for the extent to which patients’ rights were observed by all technicians and all physicians were 69.7 ± 10.5 and 57.17 ± 11.7, respectively. The corresponding values were 65.15 ± 9.36 and 54.27 ± 11.24 for the anesthesiologists and surgeons and 84.16 ± 7.31 and 66.63 ± 8.23 for the anesthetists and operating room technicians, respectively. The patients’ rights observance scores were significantly higher for the anesthetists than for the operating room technicians (P = 0.001) and higher for the anesthesiologists than for the surgeons (P = 0.005). Conclusions: This study indicated that although anesthesiologists and anesthetists observed patients’ rights more than operating room technicians and surgeons, the observance of patients’ rights in the operating room was generally moderate. Thus, it is essential to hold refresher courses in medical ethics and patient rights for medical staff.
医生和手术室技术人员对病人权利的遵守
背景:患者权利是指与身体、心理、精神和社会需求相关的特定法律特权,这些权利以医疗标准、规章和条例的形式体现出来,卫生系统和医务人员有责任遵守这些权利。目的:本研究旨在评估医生(外科医生和麻醉师)和技术人员(麻醉师和手术室技术人员)对患者权利的遵守情况。方法:对2018年在阿瓦士医科大学附属医院工作的142名手术室技术人员和医生进行描述性分析横断面研究。研究对象采用分层随机抽样方法。患者权利观察表采用间接观察方法填写,数据采用SPSS 20版分析,采用卡方检验和独立样本t检验。结果:全体技师和全体医师对患者权利的观察程度平均得分分别为69.7±10.5分和57.17±11.7分。麻醉医师和外科医师分别为65.15±9.36和54.27±11.24,麻醉医师和手术室技师分别为84.16±7.31和66.63±8.23。麻醉医师的患者权利遵守得分显著高于手术室技师(P = 0.001),麻醉医师的患者权利遵守得分显著高于外科医生(P = 0.005)。结论:本研究表明,虽然麻醉医师和麻醉师对患者权利的尊重程度高于手术室技师和外科医生,但手术室对患者权利的尊重程度普遍较低。因此,必须对医务人员进行医德和病人权利方面的进修。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信