Compensation for moral damage to the employee caused by a workplace accident or an occupational disease (example of Turkey)

O. Panchenko
{"title":"Compensation for moral damage to the employee caused by a workplace accident or an occupational disease (example of Turkey)","authors":"O. Panchenko","doi":"10.15587/2523-4153.2023.276373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace accidents not only threaten the lives of workers and damage the human capital of employers, but also increase the social costs of the State. Almost all industrialized countries have introduced laws and regulations to prevent industrial accidents and occupational diseases to reduce the cost of recovering such losses. Within the framework of this article, we turned to the example of Turkey, since this issue is regulated in sufficient detail in the legislation of this State. It has been established, that the main condition for an accident to be considered workplace accident is that the employer supervises the employee. Therefore, it is not necessary that the event takes place at the time when the employee is at the workplace or as a result of the employer’s wrongful actions. The definitions of the concepts of accident at work and occupational disease, enshrined in Social Insurance and Universal Health Insurance Law have been considered. According to the provisions of the same Law, the employer is obliged to report an accident or occupational disease to the head of the Social Security Institution (SSI) within 3 days after the event. It has been studied what types of benefits the victim can expect within social insurance. It has been determined, that claims for compensation for material and moral damage, as well as compensation for deprivation of material support as a result of an accident at work or occupational disease, are brought directly to the employer, since these types of damage are not compensated under social insurance. The conditions, the fulfillment of which is necessary to bring the employer to responsibility, have been investigated. The procedure for calculating moral compensation is not enshrined at the legislative level, but it was formed by the relevant practice of the Supreme Court. The factors that the court takes into account when determining the amount of compensation have been studied","PeriodicalId":33324,"journal":{"name":"ScienceRise Juridical Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceRise Juridical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.276373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace accidents not only threaten the lives of workers and damage the human capital of employers, but also increase the social costs of the State. Almost all industrialized countries have introduced laws and regulations to prevent industrial accidents and occupational diseases to reduce the cost of recovering such losses. Within the framework of this article, we turned to the example of Turkey, since this issue is regulated in sufficient detail in the legislation of this State. It has been established, that the main condition for an accident to be considered workplace accident is that the employer supervises the employee. Therefore, it is not necessary that the event takes place at the time when the employee is at the workplace or as a result of the employer’s wrongful actions. The definitions of the concepts of accident at work and occupational disease, enshrined in Social Insurance and Universal Health Insurance Law have been considered. According to the provisions of the same Law, the employer is obliged to report an accident or occupational disease to the head of the Social Security Institution (SSI) within 3 days after the event. It has been studied what types of benefits the victim can expect within social insurance. It has been determined, that claims for compensation for material and moral damage, as well as compensation for deprivation of material support as a result of an accident at work or occupational disease, are brought directly to the employer, since these types of damage are not compensated under social insurance. The conditions, the fulfillment of which is necessary to bring the employer to responsibility, have been investigated. The procedure for calculating moral compensation is not enshrined at the legislative level, but it was formed by the relevant practice of the Supreme Court. The factors that the court takes into account when determining the amount of compensation have been studied
工伤事故或职业病对雇员造成精神损害的赔偿(以土耳其为例)
工作场所事故不仅威胁到工人的生命,损害雇主的人力资本,而且还增加了国家的社会成本。几乎所有工业化国家都制定了防止工业事故和职业病的法律和条例,以减少挽回这些损失的费用。在本文的框架内,我们以土耳其为例,因为这个问题在该国的立法中有足够详细的规定。已经确定,事故被视为工作场所事故的主要条件是雇主监督雇员。因此,该事件不一定发生在雇员在工作场所的时候,也不一定是雇主不法行为的结果。审议了《社会保险法》和《全民健康保险法》所载的工伤事故和职业病概念的定义。根据同一法律的规定,雇主有义务在事故发生后3天内向社会保障机构负责人报告事故或职业病。人们已经研究了受害者可以在社会保险中获得哪些类型的福利。已经确定,物质和精神损害赔偿要求以及因工伤事故或职业病而丧失物质支持的赔偿要求都是直接向雇主提出的,因为这类损害不在社会保险范围内得到赔偿。已经调查了使雇主承担责任所必需的条件。精神赔偿的计算程序在立法层面并没有明确规定,但它是由最高法院的相关实践形成的。对法院在确定赔偿数额时所考虑的因素进行了研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书