Size and print path effects on mechanical properties of material extrusion 3D printed plastics.

Journal of nutrition education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s40964-022-00275-w
Jia-Ruey Ai, Bryan D Vogt
{"title":"Size and print path effects on mechanical properties of material extrusion 3D printed plastics.","authors":"Jia-Ruey Ai, Bryan D Vogt","doi":"10.1007/s40964-022-00275-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Print conditions for thermoplastics by filament-based material extrusion (MatEx) are commonly optimized to maximize the elastic modulus. However, these optimizations tend to ignore the impact of thermal history that depends on the specimen size and print path selection. Here, we investigate the effect of size print path (raster angle and build orientation) and print sequence on the mechanical properties of polycarbonate (PC) and polypropylene (PP). Examination of parallel and series printing of flat (<i>XY</i>) and stand-on (<i>YZ</i>) orientation of Type V specimens demonstrated that to observe statistical differences in the mechanical response that the interlayer time between printed roads should be approximately 5 s or less. The print time for a single layer in XY orientation is much longer than that for a single layer in <i>YZ</i> orientation, so print sequence only impacts the mechanical response in the <i>YZ</i> orientation. However, the specimen size and raster angle did influence the mechanical properties in <i>XY</i> orientation due to the differences in thermal history associated with intralayer time between adjacent roads. Moreover, all of these effects are significantly larger when printing PC than PP. These differences between PP and PC are mostly attributed to the mechanism of interface consolidation (crystallization vs. glass formation), which changes the requirements for a strong interface between roads (crystals vs. entanglements). These results illustrate how the print times dictated by the print path layout impact observed mechanical properties. This work also demonstrated that the options available in some standards developed for traditional manufacturing will change the quantitative results when applied to 3D printed parts.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40964-022-00275-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":81679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition education","volume":"13 1","pages":"1009-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8866044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00275-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Print conditions for thermoplastics by filament-based material extrusion (MatEx) are commonly optimized to maximize the elastic modulus. However, these optimizations tend to ignore the impact of thermal history that depends on the specimen size and print path selection. Here, we investigate the effect of size print path (raster angle and build orientation) and print sequence on the mechanical properties of polycarbonate (PC) and polypropylene (PP). Examination of parallel and series printing of flat (XY) and stand-on (YZ) orientation of Type V specimens demonstrated that to observe statistical differences in the mechanical response that the interlayer time between printed roads should be approximately 5 s or less. The print time for a single layer in XY orientation is much longer than that for a single layer in YZ orientation, so print sequence only impacts the mechanical response in the YZ orientation. However, the specimen size and raster angle did influence the mechanical properties in XY orientation due to the differences in thermal history associated with intralayer time between adjacent roads. Moreover, all of these effects are significantly larger when printing PC than PP. These differences between PP and PC are mostly attributed to the mechanism of interface consolidation (crystallization vs. glass formation), which changes the requirements for a strong interface between roads (crystals vs. entanglements). These results illustrate how the print times dictated by the print path layout impact observed mechanical properties. This work also demonstrated that the options available in some standards developed for traditional manufacturing will change the quantitative results when applied to 3D printed parts.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40964-022-00275-w.

材料挤压 3D 打印塑料的尺寸和打印路径对其机械性能的影响。
热塑性塑料的丝基材料挤压(MatEx)打印条件通常经过优化,以最大限度地提高弹性模量。然而,这些优化往往忽略了热历史的影响,而热历史取决于试样尺寸和打印路径的选择。在此,我们研究了尺寸打印路径(光栅角度和构建方向)和打印顺序对聚碳酸酯(PC)和聚丙烯(PP)机械性能的影响。对 V 型试样的平面(XY)和立面(YZ)方向的平行和串联打印进行的研究表明,要观察到机械响应的统计差异,打印路面之间的层间时间应约为 5 秒或更短。XY 方向单层的打印时间远远长于 YZ 方向单层的打印时间,因此打印顺序只影响 YZ 方向的机械响应。然而,试样尺寸和光栅角度确实会影响 XY 方向的机械性能,这是因为相邻路面之间层内时间相关的热历史存在差异。此外,所有这些影响在印刷 PC 时都明显大于 PP。PP 和 PC 之间的这些差异主要归因于界面固化机制(结晶与玻璃形成),这改变了对路面之间牢固界面的要求(晶体与缠结)。这些结果说明了由打印路径布局决定的打印时间如何影响观察到的机械性能。这项工作还表明,为传统制造工艺制定的一些标准中的可用选项在应用于三维打印部件时会改变定量结果:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s40964-022-00275-w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信