Comparison of the effect of jalinus syrup and ondansetron syrup on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy in pregnant women: randomized clinical trial

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
A. Shayan, S. Nazari, S. Nazari, H. Ahmadinia, M. Rahnavardi, F. Shobeiri, R. Bekhradi, A. Khalili
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of jalinus syrup and ondansetron syrup on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy in pregnant women: randomized clinical trial","authors":"A. Shayan, S. Nazari, S. Nazari, H. Ahmadinia, M. Rahnavardi, F. Shobeiri, R. Bekhradi, A. Khalili","doi":"10.2174/1573404819666220629100218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aimed to compare the effect of jainus syrup and Ondansetron syrup on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.\n\n\n\nThe present study isa single-blindrandomized clinical trial that was conducted on 120 pregnant womenreferred to the health centers of Hamadan during 2017-2018 year.The participants were randomly divided into two groups of control and intervention with 60 subjects in each group.Two groups of 60 received jalinus syrup and Ondansetron syrup for 7 days. Data collection tools, demographic questionnaire, and information associated with pregnancy, and PUQE-24 questionnaire were used to assess the severity of nausea and vomiting, and questions related to the assessment of side effects as well asparticipants’ level of satisfaction with the treatment were provided. All the data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 16. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.\n\n\n\nThe severity of nausea and vomiting in both groups decreased after the intervention, but considering the independent t-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of severity of nausea (P <0.05). According to the Chi-square test, the severity of nausea of all participants was moderate in both groups before taking the medication, and after taking the medication, the severity of nausea reduced in most participants and they were placed in the mild group.\n\n\n\nEducation based on the theory of planned behavior could significantly affect the fear of childbirth and increase the vaginal delivery rate\n\n\n\nDue to the similar effects of jalinus syrup and Ondansetron syrup in the treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and the absence of side effects arising from its use, herbal medicine can be used instead of chemical drugs.\n","PeriodicalId":11030,"journal":{"name":"Current Women s Health Reviews","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Women s Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404819666220629100218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effect of jainus syrup and Ondansetron syrup on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. The present study isa single-blindrandomized clinical trial that was conducted on 120 pregnant womenreferred to the health centers of Hamadan during 2017-2018 year.The participants were randomly divided into two groups of control and intervention with 60 subjects in each group.Two groups of 60 received jalinus syrup and Ondansetron syrup for 7 days. Data collection tools, demographic questionnaire, and information associated with pregnancy, and PUQE-24 questionnaire were used to assess the severity of nausea and vomiting, and questions related to the assessment of side effects as well asparticipants’ level of satisfaction with the treatment were provided. All the data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 16. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The severity of nausea and vomiting in both groups decreased after the intervention, but considering the independent t-test, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of severity of nausea (P <0.05). According to the Chi-square test, the severity of nausea of all participants was moderate in both groups before taking the medication, and after taking the medication, the severity of nausea reduced in most participants and they were placed in the mild group. Education based on the theory of planned behavior could significantly affect the fear of childbirth and increase the vaginal delivery rate Due to the similar effects of jalinus syrup and Ondansetron syrup in the treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and the absence of side effects arising from its use, herbal medicine can be used instead of chemical drugs.
jalinus糖浆与ondansetron糖浆对孕妇妊娠期恶心呕吐效果的比较:随机临床试验
本研究旨在比较耆那士糖浆和昂丹司琼糖浆对妊娠期恶心呕吐的影响。本研究是一项单盲临床试验,对2017-2018年期间在哈马丹卫生中心就诊的120名孕妇进行了研究。研究对象随机分为对照组和干预组,每组60人。两组60名患者分别服用jalinus糖浆和Ondansetron糖浆,疗程7天。使用数据收集工具、人口统计问卷、妊娠相关信息和PUQE-24问卷来评估恶心和呕吐的严重程度,并提供与副作用评估相关的问题以及参与者对治疗的满意度。所有数据采用SPSS软件16版进行分析。p值< 0.05为显著性。干预后两组患者恶心、呕吐严重程度均有所下降,但经独立t检验,两组患者恶心严重程度差异无统计学意义(P <0.05)。经卡方检验,两组受试者服药前恶心严重程度均为中度,服药后大部分受试者恶心严重程度减轻,归为轻度组。基于计划行为理论的教育可以显著影响分娩恐惧,提高阴道分娩率。由于jalinus糖浆和Ondansetron糖浆治疗妊娠期恶心呕吐的效果相似,且使用无副作用,因此可以使用草药代替化学药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Women s Health Reviews
Current Women s Health Reviews OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Current Women"s Health Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on obstetrics and gynecology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信