A Framework for Analyzing Features of Writing Curriculum in Studies of Student Writing Achievement

K. Oddis, J. Burstein, D. McCaffrey, Steven L. Holtzman
{"title":"A Framework for Analyzing Features of Writing Curriculum in Studies of Student Writing Achievement","authors":"K. Oddis, J. Burstein, D. McCaffrey, Steven L. Holtzman","doi":"10.37514/jwa-j.2022.6.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• Background: Researchers interested in quantitative measures of student “success” in writing cannot control completely for contextual factors which are local and site-based (i.e., in context of a specific instructor’s writing classroom at a specific institution). (In)ability to control for curriculum in studies of student writing achievement complicates interpretation of features measured in student writing. This article demonstrates how identifying and analyzing features of writing curriculum can provide dimensions of local context not captured in analysis of student-generated texts alone. Using a dataset of 48 curricular texts collected from 21 instructors teaching in five disciplines across six four-year public universities in the United States, this article: 1) presents a set of curriculum scoring rubrics developed through qualitative analysis, 2) describes a protocol for training raters to use the rubrics to score curricular texts to achieve rater agreement and generate quantitative data, and 3) explores how this framework","PeriodicalId":92857,"journal":{"name":"The journal of writing analytics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of writing analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/jwa-j.2022.6.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

• Background: Researchers interested in quantitative measures of student “success” in writing cannot control completely for contextual factors which are local and site-based (i.e., in context of a specific instructor’s writing classroom at a specific institution). (In)ability to control for curriculum in studies of student writing achievement complicates interpretation of features measured in student writing. This article demonstrates how identifying and analyzing features of writing curriculum can provide dimensions of local context not captured in analysis of student-generated texts alone. Using a dataset of 48 curricular texts collected from 21 instructors teaching in five disciplines across six four-year public universities in the United States, this article: 1) presents a set of curriculum scoring rubrics developed through qualitative analysis, 2) describes a protocol for training raters to use the rubrics to score curricular texts to achieve rater agreement and generate quantitative data, and 3) explores how this framework
学生写作成绩研究中的写作课程特征分析框架
•背景:对学生写作“成功”的定量测量感兴趣的研究人员不能完全控制当地和基于地点的上下文因素(即,在特定机构的特定教师写作课堂的背景下)。在学生写作成绩的研究中,控制课程的能力使对学生写作特征的解释变得复杂。这篇文章展示了如何识别和分析写作课程的特征,可以提供在分析学生生成的文本时无法捕捉到的地方语境维度。本文使用了从美国六所四年制公立大学五个学科的21位教师那里收集的48个课程文本的数据集:1)提出了一套通过定性分析开发的课程评分标准;2)描述了培训评分员使用这些标准对课程文本进行评分的协议,以实现评分一致性并生成定量数据;3)探讨了该框架如何实现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书