Dificultades y contradicciones en la respuesta educativa para los alumnos con necesidad específica de apoyo educativo (ACNEAE)

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
R. R. Andrés
{"title":"Dificultades y contradicciones en la respuesta educativa para los alumnos con necesidad específica de apoyo educativo (ACNEAE)","authors":"R. R. Andrés","doi":"10.14201/aula202026149168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The educational response that is being offered to students with a specific need for educational support in secondary schools or centers is considered insufficient and clearly improvable. After showing that, in these centers, the principle of attention to diversity that must permeate all basic education is violated, as well as the right to full participation, learning and success of all that the inclusive school model proclaims, in this document reflects on how the current regulations classify students who require different educational attention than ordinary ones, establishing a marked conceptual barrier between students with special educational needs (acnees) and the rest of the groups of students with specific need for educational support (acneaes) that may also present a significant gap of two or more courses at the level of curricular competence; while significant curricular adaptations (acs) are reserved exclusively for the former, the educational response that is foreseen for the latter (acneaes that are not acnees), remains in the absolute absence of definition, also falling into serious inconsistencies when designing and develop an appropriate educational proposal and, above all, when addressing one of the essential parts of the teaching / learning process: evaluation. In this sense, without renouncing for this reason to demand a more profound and structural transformation of the Educational System, a change in the regulations is proposed so that in the subjects in which this student receives specific support, normally Language and Mathematics, the evaluation takes as reference the proposed elements in the individual curricular proposals that are designed based on their level of curricular competence.","PeriodicalId":29719,"journal":{"name":"Aula Orientalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aula Orientalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/aula202026149168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The educational response that is being offered to students with a specific need for educational support in secondary schools or centers is considered insufficient and clearly improvable. After showing that, in these centers, the principle of attention to diversity that must permeate all basic education is violated, as well as the right to full participation, learning and success of all that the inclusive school model proclaims, in this document reflects on how the current regulations classify students who require different educational attention than ordinary ones, establishing a marked conceptual barrier between students with special educational needs (acnees) and the rest of the groups of students with specific need for educational support (acneaes) that may also present a significant gap of two or more courses at the level of curricular competence; while significant curricular adaptations (acs) are reserved exclusively for the former, the educational response that is foreseen for the latter (acneaes that are not acnees), remains in the absolute absence of definition, also falling into serious inconsistencies when designing and develop an appropriate educational proposal and, above all, when addressing one of the essential parts of the teaching / learning process: evaluation. In this sense, without renouncing for this reason to demand a more profound and structural transformation of the Educational System, a change in the regulations is proposed so that in the subjects in which this student receives specific support, normally Language and Mathematics, the evaluation takes as reference the proposed elements in the individual curricular proposals that are designed based on their level of curricular competence.
特殊需要教育支持的学生在教育反应中的困难与矛盾(ACNEAE)
在中学或中心,对有特殊需要的学生提供的教育响应被认为是不够的,显然可以改进。在说明这些中心违反了必须贯穿所有基础教育的关注多样性的原则,以及全纳学校模式所宣称的所有人的充分参与、学习和成功的权利之后,本文件反思了现行规定如何对需要不同于普通教育关注的学生进行分类。在有特殊教育需要的学生(acnees)和其他有特殊教育需要的学生(acnees)之间建立明显的概念障碍,这些学生在课程能力水平上也可能出现两门或两门以上课程的显著差距;虽然重大的课程调整(acs)是专门为前者保留的,但对后者的预期教育反应(不是目标的目标)仍然绝对缺乏定义,在设计和制定适当的教育建议时,尤其是在处理教/学过程的一个重要部分时,也陷入严重的不一致:评估。从这个意义上说,在不放弃要求对教育系统进行更深刻和结构性改革的原因的情况下,建议改变规定,以便在学生获得具体支持的科目中,通常是语言和数学,评估将根据他们的课程能力水平设计的个别课程建议中的建议元素作为参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aula Orientalis
Aula Orientalis Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信