A “symbol school”: disputes and strategies of teachers from a school subfield

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ana Cecília Romano de Mello, Ivanilda Higa
{"title":"A “symbol school”: disputes and strategies of teachers from a school subfield","authors":"Ana Cecília Romano de Mello, Ivanilda Higa","doi":"10.1590/1984-0411.85976-t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The contribution of Bourdieu’s sociological theory to Education is current. The concepts of habitus, capital, and social field, in an articulated way, allow a dialectical understanding of the social agents in society. Thus, with the use of a concept derived from Bourdieu, such as school field and subfield, it is possible to understand the school institution as a builder of its own dynamics, with specific characteristics and demands, far beyond a mere passive consumer of educational projects and policies produced externally to it. In this sense, this work proposes, through systematic narrative observation and interviews with a group of Science and Biology teachers from a subfield of the school, the description and analysis of disputes, capitals, strategies, and positions of teachers in the subfield in question. A different valuation was assigned to each of the strategies according to the greater or minor possibility of social prestige in the subfield. With this, the dynamics of this subfield were understood, contributing to highlighting that within Brazilian schools there are disputes, interests, and demands that must be considered in the relationship with the other subfields, as well as in the development of educational projects and policies.","PeriodicalId":45723,"journal":{"name":"Educar em Revista","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educar em Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0411.85976-t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The contribution of Bourdieu’s sociological theory to Education is current. The concepts of habitus, capital, and social field, in an articulated way, allow a dialectical understanding of the social agents in society. Thus, with the use of a concept derived from Bourdieu, such as school field and subfield, it is possible to understand the school institution as a builder of its own dynamics, with specific characteristics and demands, far beyond a mere passive consumer of educational projects and policies produced externally to it. In this sense, this work proposes, through systematic narrative observation and interviews with a group of Science and Biology teachers from a subfield of the school, the description and analysis of disputes, capitals, strategies, and positions of teachers in the subfield in question. A different valuation was assigned to each of the strategies according to the greater or minor possibility of social prestige in the subfield. With this, the dynamics of this subfield were understood, contributing to highlighting that within Brazilian schools there are disputes, interests, and demands that must be considered in the relationship with the other subfields, as well as in the development of educational projects and policies.
一个“符号学校”:一个学校子领域教师的争论与对策
布迪厄的社会学理论对教育的贡献是当下的。习惯、资本和社会领域的概念,以一种清晰的方式,允许对社会中的社会代理人进行辩证的理解。因此,通过使用布迪厄的概念,如学校场域和子场域,可以将学校机构理解为自身动态的建设者,具有特定的特征和需求,远远超出了外部产生的教育项目和政策的被动消费者。在这个意义上,本工作提出,通过系统的叙事观察和对一群来自学校子领域的科学和生物教师的访谈,描述和分析该子领域教师的争议、资本、策略和立场。根据子领域中社会声望的可能性大小,对每种策略进行了不同的评估。由此,这一子领域的动态被理解,有助于强调巴西学校内部存在争议、利益和需求,必须考虑与其他子领域的关系,以及教育项目和政策的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educar em Revista
Educar em Revista EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信