Making Good Use of Adaptive Management

H. Doremus, W. L. Andreen, Alejandro E. Camacho, D. Farber, Robert L. Glicksman, D. Goble, B. Karkkainen, Daniel J. Rohlf, A. Tarlock, Sandra B. Zellmer, S. Jones, Ling-Yee Huang
{"title":"Making Good Use of Adaptive Management","authors":"H. Doremus, W. L. Andreen, Alejandro E. Camacho, D. Farber, Robert L. Glicksman, D. Goble, B. Karkkainen, Daniel J. Rohlf, A. Tarlock, Sandra B. Zellmer, S. Jones, Ling-Yee Huang","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1808106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, natural resource scientists, managers, and policymakers have increasingly endorsed “adaptive management” of land and natural resources. Indeed, this approach, based on adaptive implementation of resource management and pollution control laws, is now mandated in a variety of contexts at the federal and state level. Yet confusion remains over the meaning of adaptive management, and disagreement persists over its usefulness or feasibility in specific contexts. This white paper is intended to help legislators, agency personnel, and the public better understand and use adaptive management. Adaptive management is not a panacea for the problems that plague natural resource management woes. It is appropriate in some contexts, but not in others. Drawing on key literature as well as case studies, we offer an explanation of adaptive management, including a discussion of its benefits and challenges; a roadmap for deciding whether or not to use it in a particular context; and best practices for obtaining its benefits while avoiding its potential pitfalls. Following these recommendations should simultaneously improve the ability of resource managers to achieve management goals determined by society and the ability of citizens to hold managers accountable to those goals.","PeriodicalId":83406,"journal":{"name":"University of California, Davis law review","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of California, Davis law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1808106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Over the last two decades, natural resource scientists, managers, and policymakers have increasingly endorsed “adaptive management” of land and natural resources. Indeed, this approach, based on adaptive implementation of resource management and pollution control laws, is now mandated in a variety of contexts at the federal and state level. Yet confusion remains over the meaning of adaptive management, and disagreement persists over its usefulness or feasibility in specific contexts. This white paper is intended to help legislators, agency personnel, and the public better understand and use adaptive management. Adaptive management is not a panacea for the problems that plague natural resource management woes. It is appropriate in some contexts, but not in others. Drawing on key literature as well as case studies, we offer an explanation of adaptive management, including a discussion of its benefits and challenges; a roadmap for deciding whether or not to use it in a particular context; and best practices for obtaining its benefits while avoiding its potential pitfalls. Following these recommendations should simultaneously improve the ability of resource managers to achieve management goals determined by society and the ability of citizens to hold managers accountable to those goals.
善用适应性管理
在过去的二十年里,自然资源科学家、管理者和政策制定者越来越支持土地和自然资源的“适应性管理”。事实上,这种基于资源管理和污染控制法律的适应性实施的方法,现在在联邦和州一级的各种情况下都是强制性的。然而,对适应性管理的含义仍然存在困惑,对其在特定背景下的有用性或可行性仍然存在分歧。本白皮书旨在帮助立法者、机构人员和公众更好地理解和使用适应性管理。适应性管理并不是解决困扰自然资源管理问题的灵丹妙药。它在某些情况下是合适的,但在其他情况下则不合适。根据关键文献和案例研究,我们对适应性管理进行了解释,包括对其好处和挑战的讨论;决定是否在特定上下文中使用它的路线图;以及在避免潜在缺陷的同时获得好处的最佳实践。遵循这些建议应同时提高资源管理者实现社会确定的管理目标的能力,以及公民要求管理者对这些目标负责的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信