Reexamination of Thermal Cycling Reliability of BGA Components with SNAGCU and SnPb Solder Joints on Different Board Designs

Sinan Su, F. Akkara, T. Sanders, Jiawei Zhang, John L. Evans, Gregory Harris
{"title":"Reexamination of Thermal Cycling Reliability of BGA Components with SNAGCU and SnPb Solder Joints on Different Board Designs","authors":"Sinan Su, F. Akkara, T. Sanders, Jiawei Zhang, John L. Evans, Gregory Harris","doi":"10.23919/PanPacific48324.2020.9059402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a direct comparison was conducted between SnPb and lead-free solder joints focused on long-term thermal cycling reliability after being exposed to high-temperature aging for a long period of time using two test vehicle designs. Ball Grid Array (BGA) packages with SAC305 (Sn-3%Ag-0.5%Cu) and eutectic SnPb (63%Sn-37%Pb) were compared in this research. After the test, IMC thickness and failure modes of BGA components on the different test vehicles were investigated. The results from the post-test examination were analyzed to explain certain unexpected outcomes of the two test vehicle designs when comparing the reliability results among the two programs of tests. The results showed that for the TC1 test vehicle, SAC305 solder joints show better reliability than the SnPb solder joints; while the reliability of the SnPb solder joints outperformed the SAC305 solder joints after 6 months of high-temperature aging for the TV7 test vehicle. Meanwhile, even on the same test vehicle, the failure modes varied between components with SAC305 and SnPb solder joints.","PeriodicalId":6691,"journal":{"name":"2020 Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (Pan Pacific)","volume":"819 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (Pan Pacific)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PanPacific48324.2020.9059402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, a direct comparison was conducted between SnPb and lead-free solder joints focused on long-term thermal cycling reliability after being exposed to high-temperature aging for a long period of time using two test vehicle designs. Ball Grid Array (BGA) packages with SAC305 (Sn-3%Ag-0.5%Cu) and eutectic SnPb (63%Sn-37%Pb) were compared in this research. After the test, IMC thickness and failure modes of BGA components on the different test vehicles were investigated. The results from the post-test examination were analyzed to explain certain unexpected outcomes of the two test vehicle designs when comparing the reliability results among the two programs of tests. The results showed that for the TC1 test vehicle, SAC305 solder joints show better reliability than the SnPb solder joints; while the reliability of the SnPb solder joints outperformed the SAC305 solder joints after 6 months of high-temperature aging for the TV7 test vehicle. Meanwhile, even on the same test vehicle, the failure modes varied between components with SAC305 and SnPb solder joints.
不同板上SNAGCU和SnPb焊点BGA元件热循环可靠性的再检验
本文采用两种试验车设计,对SnPb焊点和无铅焊点在长时间高温老化后的长期热循环可靠性进行了直接比较。本研究比较了SAC305 (Sn-3%Ag-0.5%Cu)和共晶SnPb (63%Sn-37%Pb)的球栅阵列(BGA)封装。试验结束后,对不同试验车辆上BGA组件的内嵌层厚度和失效模式进行了研究。对试验后检验结果进行分析,以解释两种试验车辆设计在比较两种试验方案的可靠性结果时出现的某些意想不到的结果。结果表明:在TC1试验车上,SAC305焊点的可靠性优于SnPb焊点;而在TV7试验车上,经过6个月的高温老化后,SnPb焊点的可靠性优于SAC305焊点。同时,即使在同一试验车上,SAC305和SnPb焊点组件的失效模式也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信