Introduction: Special Issue on Feminism and Family Life

M. B. Zinn, Heather Dillaway
{"title":"Introduction: Special Issue on Feminism and Family Life","authors":"M. B. Zinn, Heather Dillaway","doi":"10.3998/MFR.4919087.0010.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminism has revolutionized the family field. Probably no field of study is more profoundly influenced by feminist thought. In the four decades since feminist scholars introduced a gendered understanding of family life, the field has absorbed feminist influences. Feminist concepts and investigative strategies have produced new descriptions of family experience, conceptualized family forms and family processes in new ways, and identified new topics for investigation. Feminist scholars have also illustrated the general importance of family studies, elevating our general interest in and concern for this social institution; studies of families and family life are now seen as parallel to studies of individuals or groups in other social institutions.Unlike other disciplines, which marginalize feminist works, the family field now incorporates key feminist elements into its very core. Not all family scholars work from an explicitly feminist perspective, but many feminist concerns have become embedded in the foundational frameworks of the field. At the same time, feminist research and activism flourish throughout the family domain. Family researchers and practitioners can draw from a voluminous and generative feminist literature on every conceivable family topic.This issue of the Michigan Family Review undertakes a feminist examination of family life. A call for papers produced a submission of 10 papers, which were then reviewed by referees. We anticipated that papers submitted and finally selected would present a blend of theoretical, empirical, and practice-based orientations, and that they would strike a balance between family related disciplines. This was not the case. In both submissions and final selections, sociological studies outnumber the others. Although all contributors are sociologists, the articles use intellectual traditions drawn from a variety of disciplines along with wide-ranging methods of inquiry.To make our feminist issue of the Michigan Family Review as current and comprehensive as possible, we invited scholars to review recently published books on gender and family and to pay special attention to their feminist and policy implications. The books selected for review include the topics of gender equity in national family and work policy (Jacobs and Gerson), caregiving among families of different class locations (Hansen), the impact of Viagra on intimate relationships (Loe), men's contemporary experiences of fatherhood (Townsend), the uniqueness of African American families (Hill), and a history of marriage (Coontz). While the books represent the national community of feminist family scholars, many of the research-based articles in this issue examine family life in Michigan communities. All of the contributors to this collection have strong connections to Michigan colleges and universities.We have tried to make this issue appealing to family scholars and practitioners as well as feminists across a range of disciplines. The selection of each article was guided by its scholarly merit and by questions such as these: Is it informed by feminist principles? Does it reflect current feminist thought? Does it open the family field to new kinds of gender questions?Feminist ThemesThe collection is, in many respects, exemplary of the present character of feminist research on families. The contents are not easily categorized: If there is a unifying thread, it will be found in the persistent attention given to different contexts and social locations that produce a range of family experiences for women and men. All of the articles move family analysis beyond dichotomous simplifications of women's and men's experiences as well. Although gender in families remains an anchor point, it is always contingent on other dimensions of difference such as social class, race, and sexual orientation. The following themes reflected in the articles also are central to current feminist thought on the family. …","PeriodicalId":32430,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Family Review","volume":"69 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Family Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MFR.4919087.0010.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feminism has revolutionized the family field. Probably no field of study is more profoundly influenced by feminist thought. In the four decades since feminist scholars introduced a gendered understanding of family life, the field has absorbed feminist influences. Feminist concepts and investigative strategies have produced new descriptions of family experience, conceptualized family forms and family processes in new ways, and identified new topics for investigation. Feminist scholars have also illustrated the general importance of family studies, elevating our general interest in and concern for this social institution; studies of families and family life are now seen as parallel to studies of individuals or groups in other social institutions.Unlike other disciplines, which marginalize feminist works, the family field now incorporates key feminist elements into its very core. Not all family scholars work from an explicitly feminist perspective, but many feminist concerns have become embedded in the foundational frameworks of the field. At the same time, feminist research and activism flourish throughout the family domain. Family researchers and practitioners can draw from a voluminous and generative feminist literature on every conceivable family topic.This issue of the Michigan Family Review undertakes a feminist examination of family life. A call for papers produced a submission of 10 papers, which were then reviewed by referees. We anticipated that papers submitted and finally selected would present a blend of theoretical, empirical, and practice-based orientations, and that they would strike a balance between family related disciplines. This was not the case. In both submissions and final selections, sociological studies outnumber the others. Although all contributors are sociologists, the articles use intellectual traditions drawn from a variety of disciplines along with wide-ranging methods of inquiry.To make our feminist issue of the Michigan Family Review as current and comprehensive as possible, we invited scholars to review recently published books on gender and family and to pay special attention to their feminist and policy implications. The books selected for review include the topics of gender equity in national family and work policy (Jacobs and Gerson), caregiving among families of different class locations (Hansen), the impact of Viagra on intimate relationships (Loe), men's contemporary experiences of fatherhood (Townsend), the uniqueness of African American families (Hill), and a history of marriage (Coontz). While the books represent the national community of feminist family scholars, many of the research-based articles in this issue examine family life in Michigan communities. All of the contributors to this collection have strong connections to Michigan colleges and universities.We have tried to make this issue appealing to family scholars and practitioners as well as feminists across a range of disciplines. The selection of each article was guided by its scholarly merit and by questions such as these: Is it informed by feminist principles? Does it reflect current feminist thought? Does it open the family field to new kinds of gender questions?Feminist ThemesThe collection is, in many respects, exemplary of the present character of feminist research on families. The contents are not easily categorized: If there is a unifying thread, it will be found in the persistent attention given to different contexts and social locations that produce a range of family experiences for women and men. All of the articles move family analysis beyond dichotomous simplifications of women's and men's experiences as well. Although gender in families remains an anchor point, it is always contingent on other dimensions of difference such as social class, race, and sexual orientation. The following themes reflected in the articles also are central to current feminist thought on the family. …
导言:女性主义与家庭生活特刊
女权主义使家庭领域发生了革命性的变化。也许没有哪个研究领域比女权主义思想影响更深远了。在女性主义学者引入对家庭生活的性别理解后的四十年里,这一领域吸收了女性主义的影响。女性主义概念和调查策略产生了对家庭经验的新描述,以新的方式概念化了家庭形式和家庭过程,并确定了新的调查主题。女权主义学者也说明了家庭研究的总体重要性,提升了我们对这个社会机构的普遍兴趣和关注;对家庭和家庭生活的研究现在被视为与对其他社会机构中的个人或群体的研究平行。与其他将女权主义作品边缘化的学科不同,家庭领域现在将关键的女权主义元素纳入其核心。并不是所有的家庭学者都从明确的女权主义角度出发,但许多女权主义的关注已经嵌入到该领域的基本框架中。与此同时,女权主义研究和行动主义在整个家庭领域蓬勃发展。家庭研究人员和实践者可以从大量的女性主义文献中汲取每一个可以想象的家庭话题。这期《密歇根家庭评论》对家庭生活进行了女权主义的审视。论文征集产生了10篇论文,然后由审稿人审阅。我们预期提交和最终选择的论文将呈现理论,经验和实践为基础的方向的混合,并且它们将在家庭相关学科之间取得平衡。但事实并非如此。在提交和最终选择中,社会学研究的数量都超过了其他研究。虽然所有的贡献者都是社会学家,但这些文章使用了来自各种学科的知识传统以及广泛的调查方法。为了使《密歇根家庭评论》的女权主义问题尽可能地与时俱进和全面,我们邀请了一些学者来评论最近出版的关于性别和家庭的书籍,并特别关注它们对女权主义和政策的影响。这些书的主题包括国家家庭和工作政策中的性别平等(雅各布斯和格森)、不同阶层家庭之间的照顾(汉森)、伟哥对亲密关系的影响(洛)、男性的当代父亲经历(汤森德)、非裔美国家庭的独特性(希尔)和婚姻的历史(库茨)。虽然这些书代表了女权主义家庭学者的全国社区,但这期杂志上的许多基于研究的文章都考察了密歇根州社区的家庭生活。这个集合的所有贡献者都与密歇根的学院和大学有着密切的联系。我们试图让这个问题吸引家庭学者和实践者,以及一系列学科的女权主义者。每篇文章的选择都以其学术价值和以下问题为指导:它是否受到女权主义原则的影响?它是否反映了当前的女权主义思想?它是否为家庭领域开辟了新的性别问题?女性主义主题从许多方面来说,这本文集是女性主义家庭研究当前特征的典范。这些内容很难分类:如果有一个统一的线索,它将在对不同背景和社会位置的持续关注中被发现,这些背景和社会位置产生了一系列女性和男性的家庭经历。所有的文章都使家庭分析超越了对女性和男性经历的二分简化。虽然家庭中的性别仍然是一个锚点,但它总是取决于其他方面的差异,如社会阶层、种族和性取向。文章中反映的以下主题也是当前女性主义家庭思想的核心。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书