SELF-DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL NATURE AND PECULIARITIES OF IMPLEMENTATION

D. Karp
{"title":"SELF-DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL NATURE AND PECULIARITIES OF IMPLEMENTATION","authors":"D. Karp","doi":"10.37440/soclaw.2019.01.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the conceptual aspects of determining the right to self-determination of national minorities in the science of constitutional law. It is argued that the current constitutions reflect certain conceptual approaches to the subjective composition of national minorities, which requires their comprehensive consideration and scientific and practical analysis in terms of current processes of European interstate integration in the implementation of universally recognized human rights standards, principles and norms, citizen and social groups. \nThe question of national minorities arose in the sixteenth century. Since the sixteenth century, their rights have been enshrined in a number of treaties. After World War I, this process is controlled by the League of Nations. In the respective treaties, national minorities were defined as ethnic religious and linguistic communities that differed in language, ethnicity and culture from the population in which they live. The complexity of the problem lies in the diversity of situations related to the existence of minorities and the concept of nationality as a whole. \nOne of the most successful concepts of \"minority groups\", which is proposed by the famous Danish scientist Luis Wirth, has been identified. The existence of dominant minorities that do not need protection is justified. Moreover, dominant minorities are sometimes subject to serious violations of the principles of equality, non-discrimination and will of the people as enshrined in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. \nAttention is drawn to the use of the term \"national minority\" in national legislation and it is noted that the process of defining the definition of \"national minority\" is only at the initial stage of formation. The law, which defines the term \"national minority\" at the official level, became the Law of Ukraine \"On National Minorities in Ukraine\", adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 25, 1992.","PeriodicalId":82482,"journal":{"name":"Review of socialist law","volume":"257 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of socialist law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37440/soclaw.2019.01.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the conceptual aspects of determining the right to self-determination of national minorities in the science of constitutional law. It is argued that the current constitutions reflect certain conceptual approaches to the subjective composition of national minorities, which requires their comprehensive consideration and scientific and practical analysis in terms of current processes of European interstate integration in the implementation of universally recognized human rights standards, principles and norms, citizen and social groups. The question of national minorities arose in the sixteenth century. Since the sixteenth century, their rights have been enshrined in a number of treaties. After World War I, this process is controlled by the League of Nations. In the respective treaties, national minorities were defined as ethnic religious and linguistic communities that differed in language, ethnicity and culture from the population in which they live. The complexity of the problem lies in the diversity of situations related to the existence of minorities and the concept of nationality as a whole. One of the most successful concepts of "minority groups", which is proposed by the famous Danish scientist Luis Wirth, has been identified. The existence of dominant minorities that do not need protection is justified. Moreover, dominant minorities are sometimes subject to serious violations of the principles of equality, non-discrimination and will of the people as enshrined in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Attention is drawn to the use of the term "national minority" in national legislation and it is noted that the process of defining the definition of "national minority" is only at the initial stage of formation. The law, which defines the term "national minority" at the official level, became the Law of Ukraine "On National Minorities in Ukraine", adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 25, 1992.
少数民族自决:宪法和法律性质及其执行的特点
本文从宪法学的角度论述了少数民族自决权确定的概念问题。有人认为,现行宪法反映了对少数民族主观构成的某些概念方法,这需要根据目前欧洲国家间一体化在执行普遍公认的人权标准、原则和规范、公民和社会群体方面的进程进行全面审议和科学和实际分析。少数民族问题出现于16世纪。自16世纪以来,他们的权利已载入若干条约。第一次世界大战后,这一进程由国际联盟控制。在各自的条约中,少数民族被定义为在语言、族裔和文化上与其所生活的人口不同的族裔、宗教和语言社区。这个问题的复杂性在于与少数民族的存在和整个民族概念有关的情况的多样性。丹麦著名科学家路易斯·沃斯(Luis Wirth)提出的“少数群体”概念是最成功的概念之一。不需要保护的占主导地位的少数群体的存在是合理的。此外,占主导地位的少数群体有时会受到严重违反《联合国世界人权宣言》所载平等、不歧视和人民意愿原则的侵害。委员会提请注意在国家立法中使用“少数民族”一词,并指出,确定“少数民族”定义的过程仅处于形成的初步阶段。这项法律在官方一级定义了“少数民族”一词,成为乌克兰最高拉达于1992年6月25日通过的“关于乌克兰少数民族”的乌克兰法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书