Privatising land in England

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
A. Layard
{"title":"Privatising land in England","authors":"A. Layard","doi":"10.1108/JPPEL-03-2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to analyse the extent to which privatising – or denationalising land – has legal and policy effects.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIt applies the law in context scholarship to the question of land privatisation.\n\n\nFindings\nOf all the recent privatisations in England, the most valuable, and yet least recorded, is of land. According to one estimate, two million hectares or 10 per cent of the Britain landmass, left the public sector for private ownership between 1979 and 2018. Privatisations include land that is sold, leased or where a public body changes its status. This paper aims to explore these privatisations, considering them as denationalisations, concluding that the effects are most significant in housing where the differences between social and private renting in relation to rents, the security of tenure and housing quality are striking. Moreover, although other public law restraints on the state-owned property are often limited, they are also still significant, facilitating scrutiny, particularly in combination with the public sector equality duty or site-specific duties for libraries, allotments or playing fields. All the sites disposed of to private developers, landlords and companies have lost these protections.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first time this question has been considered in this way from a legal perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-03-2019-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyse the extent to which privatising – or denationalising land – has legal and policy effects. Design/methodology/approach It applies the law in context scholarship to the question of land privatisation. Findings Of all the recent privatisations in England, the most valuable, and yet least recorded, is of land. According to one estimate, two million hectares or 10 per cent of the Britain landmass, left the public sector for private ownership between 1979 and 2018. Privatisations include land that is sold, leased or where a public body changes its status. This paper aims to explore these privatisations, considering them as denationalisations, concluding that the effects are most significant in housing where the differences between social and private renting in relation to rents, the security of tenure and housing quality are striking. Moreover, although other public law restraints on the state-owned property are often limited, they are also still significant, facilitating scrutiny, particularly in combination with the public sector equality duty or site-specific duties for libraries, allotments or playing fields. All the sites disposed of to private developers, landlords and companies have lost these protections. Originality/value This is the first time this question has been considered in this way from a legal perspective.
英国的土地私有化
本文旨在分析土地私有化或土地非国有化对法律和政策的影响程度。设计/方法/方法它将法律在语境中应用于土地私有化问题。在英国最近发生的所有私有化事件中,最有价值却最少被记录的是土地私有化。根据一项估计,在1979年至2018年期间,有200万公顷(占英国陆地面积的10%)的土地从公共部门转为私人所有。私有化包括出售、出租或公共机构改变其地位的土地。本文旨在探讨这些私有化,将其视为非国有化,并得出结论认为,在住房方面,社会和私人租赁之间在租金、使用权安全和住房质量方面的差异最为显著。此外,尽管其他公法对国有财产的限制往往有限,但它们也仍然很重要,有助于审查,特别是与公共部门平等义务或图书馆、分配或运动场的特定地点义务相结合。所有出让给私人开发商、房东和公司的土地都失去了这些保护。原创性/价值这是第一次从法律角度以这种方式考虑这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信