CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS AFTER COMBINED THERAPY OF BEVACIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION AND TOPICAL DICLOFENAC COMPARED WITH BEVACIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION ALONE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Melvina Nidya Sandra, Yumni Shabrina, T. W. Widayanti, Retno Ekantini, Agus Supartoto, M. B. Sasongko, S. Haryanto
{"title":"CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS AFTER COMBINED THERAPY OF BEVACIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION AND TOPICAL DICLOFENAC COMPARED WITH BEVACIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION ALONE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA","authors":"Melvina Nidya Sandra, Yumni Shabrina, T. W. Widayanti, Retno Ekantini, Agus Supartoto, M. B. Sasongko, S. Haryanto","doi":"10.35479/ijretina.2021.vol004.iss002.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To evaluate whether the combination of diclofenac eye drops and bevacizumab intravitreal injection would provide additional benefits over bevacizumab alone in the treatment of naïve diabetic macular edema (DME). \nMethods: A total of 43 patients were enrolled consecutively and randomized into two groups to receive combination treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab and topical diclofenac (group 1) or bevacizumab alone (group 2). Group 1 patients received single bevacizumab intravitreal injection and got self-administered diclofenac eye drop four times daily for one month. Group 2 patients received single bevacizumab intravitreal injection alone. Outcome data were obtained from patient visits at baseline and at 1 month after bevacizumab intravitreal injection. All patients underwent measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), a complete eye examination, and measurement of central macular thickness (CMT). \nResult: The mean reduction in CMT in the combination group was 130.42±32.57 µm (p<0.01), while in the bevacizumab alone group the reduction was 141.38±45.27 µm (p<0.01), there is no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.866). The mean improvement of BCVA was 0.32±0.10 log Mar in the combination group and 0.26±0.12 in group 2, there is no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.691). There was no adverse ocular event in the two groups. \nConclusion: In patients with naïve DME, adding diclofenac eye drop as adjuvant of bevacizumab intravitreal injection are less likely to have a meaningful effect on reducing the central macular thickness. \nKeywords: Diabetic macular edema, NSAID, diclofenac, anti-VEGF, bevacizumab, central macular thickness","PeriodicalId":33128,"journal":{"name":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35479/ijretina.2021.vol004.iss002.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate whether the combination of diclofenac eye drops and bevacizumab intravitreal injection would provide additional benefits over bevacizumab alone in the treatment of naïve diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: A total of 43 patients were enrolled consecutively and randomized into two groups to receive combination treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab and topical diclofenac (group 1) or bevacizumab alone (group 2). Group 1 patients received single bevacizumab intravitreal injection and got self-administered diclofenac eye drop four times daily for one month. Group 2 patients received single bevacizumab intravitreal injection alone. Outcome data were obtained from patient visits at baseline and at 1 month after bevacizumab intravitreal injection. All patients underwent measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), a complete eye examination, and measurement of central macular thickness (CMT). Result: The mean reduction in CMT in the combination group was 130.42±32.57 µm (p<0.01), while in the bevacizumab alone group the reduction was 141.38±45.27 µm (p<0.01), there is no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.866). The mean improvement of BCVA was 0.32±0.10 log Mar in the combination group and 0.26±0.12 in group 2, there is no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.691). There was no adverse ocular event in the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with naïve DME, adding diclofenac eye drop as adjuvant of bevacizumab intravitreal injection are less likely to have a meaningful effect on reducing the central macular thickness. Keywords: Diabetic macular edema, NSAID, diclofenac, anti-VEGF, bevacizumab, central macular thickness
贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射和局部双氯芬酸联合治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿后中央黄斑厚度与单独贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射的比较
简介:评估双氯芬酸滴眼液和贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射联合治疗naïve糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是否比贝伐单抗单独治疗更有益处。方法:连续纳入43例患者,随机分为两组,分别接受贝伐珠单抗玻璃体内联合双氯芬酸治疗(1组)和贝伐珠单抗单独治疗(2组)。1组患者接受单次贝伐珠单抗玻璃体内注射,同时自行给予双氯芬酸滴眼液,每日4次,连续1个月。2组患者单独接受单次贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射。结果数据来自基线和贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射后1个月的患者就诊。所有患者均接受最佳矫正视力(BCVA)测量、完整的眼部检查和黄斑中心厚度(CMT)测量。结果:联合用药组CMT平均减少量为130.42±32.57µm (p<0.01),单用贝伐单抗组CMT平均减少量为141.38±45.27µm (p<0.01),两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.866)。联合治疗组BCVA平均改善率为0.32±0.10 log Mar, 2组平均改善率为0.26±0.12 log Mar,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p=0.691)。两组患者均未见眼部不良事件发生。结论:在naïve DME患者中,添加双氯芬酸滴眼液作为贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射的辅助剂,对降低中央黄斑厚度的效果不明显。关键词:糖尿病性黄斑水肿,非甾体抗炎药,双氯芬酸,抗vegf,贝伐单抗,中央黄斑厚度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信