Validity and Reliability Content of Physics Problem Solving Test Instrument Based on Local Wisdom

Dwiana Octafia, S. Supriyadi, S. Sulhadi
{"title":"Validity and Reliability Content of Physics Problem Solving Test Instrument Based on Local Wisdom","authors":"Dwiana Octafia, S. Supriyadi, S. Sulhadi","doi":"10.15294/jere.v9i1.43712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was part of the research development a instrument test for the ability to solve physics problems based on problems that occur in the field, that is an instrument for assessing the ability to solve problems that has not been tested. The purpose of this study was to reveal the validity and reliability of the contents of the physics problem solving ability test instrument that had previously been compiled. The research method used is a quantitative description by 5 expert judgments. The instrument developed in the form of an expert observation sheet with 3 aspects of assessment, namely aspects of content feasibility, aspects of construction and aspects of language. Analysis of the content validity of the observation sheet using the V coefficient by Aiken and the reliability of the instrument content using the Inter-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) analysis with the help of SPSS version 16.0. Based on the results of the study, it shows valid results with all item items valued> 0.3, those are with the lowest index 0.6 and the highest 1.0. Inter-rater reliability test using ICC obtained a value of 0.630, which means that all aspects of the instrument for assessing the ability of physics problem solving that have been assessed have a level of consistency. Based on the results of these studies, the test instrument for the ability to solve physics problems is feasible to use.","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"772 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v9i1.43712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was part of the research development a instrument test for the ability to solve physics problems based on problems that occur in the field, that is an instrument for assessing the ability to solve problems that has not been tested. The purpose of this study was to reveal the validity and reliability of the contents of the physics problem solving ability test instrument that had previously been compiled. The research method used is a quantitative description by 5 expert judgments. The instrument developed in the form of an expert observation sheet with 3 aspects of assessment, namely aspects of content feasibility, aspects of construction and aspects of language. Analysis of the content validity of the observation sheet using the V coefficient by Aiken and the reliability of the instrument content using the Inter-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) analysis with the help of SPSS version 16.0. Based on the results of the study, it shows valid results with all item items valued> 0.3, those are with the lowest index 0.6 and the highest 1.0. Inter-rater reliability test using ICC obtained a value of 0.630, which means that all aspects of the instrument for assessing the ability of physics problem solving that have been assessed have a level of consistency. Based on the results of these studies, the test instrument for the ability to solve physics problems is feasible to use.
基于局部智慧的物理解题测试仪器的效度和信度内容
这项研究是一项研究开发的一部分,该研究开发了一种仪器测试,用于解决基于该领域发生的问题的物理问题的能力,这是一种评估解决尚未经过测试的问题的能力的仪器。本研究的目的是揭示先前编制的物理问题解决能力测试工具内容的效度和信度。采用的研究方法是由5个专家判断进行定量描述。该工具以专家观察表的形式开发,有三个方面的评估,即内容可行性方面,结构方面和语言方面。观察表的内容效度采用Aiken的V系数分析,仪器内容的信度采用类间相关系数(Inter-class Correlation coefficient, ICC)分析,SPSS version 16.0。从研究结果来看,所有条目条目值> 0.3均为有效结果,最低指数为0.6,最高指数为1.0。使用ICC进行的评分者间信度测试获得了0.630的值,这意味着评估物理问题解决能力的仪器的所有方面都被评估具有一定程度的一致性。基于这些研究结果,该物理问题解决能力测试仪器是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书