Characterizing Opioid Response in Older Veterans in the Post-Acute Setting

Victoria D. Powell
{"title":"Characterizing Opioid Response in Older Veterans in the Post-Acute Setting","authors":"Victoria D. Powell","doi":"10.12788/fp.0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opioids often are used in post-acute care (PAC) settings, although there is a lack of evidence of sustained pain reduction and improved function. There are subgroups of individuals whose pain does not respond well to opioids yet report these agents as highly beneficial. We aimed to classify opioid responsiveness among veterans residing in a US Department of Veterans Affairs community living center PAC unit. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study used barcode medication administration data followed by retrospective chart review. We determined opioid responsiveness along a continuum during 4 nonconsecutive days in 2016 and 2017. We defined opioid responsiveness as the mean change in pre- and postopioid pain ratings using the 0 to 10 scale over the 24-hour observation period (ie, mean ∆ score). The chart review identified correlates of opioid responsiveness adjusting for mean pre-opioid pain ratings. Results: Among the 41 residents who received opioids for at least moderate pain (≥ 4 of 10), the average response was highly variable (range, 0.5 - 6.3). Response did not correlate with demographic variables, indication for admission, or medical comorbidities, including cancer diagnosis. The presence of any psychiatric diagnosis ( P = .03), pain service consult ( P = .03), and higher opioid dosage ( P = .002) was significantly associated with poorer response. Conclusions: This pilot study classified opioid response on a continuum using a scalable administrative data source. Despite receiving higher dosages and more specialist consultations, some veterans’ pain responds poorly to opioids. Psychiatric comorbidity seems to increase this risk. Future studies in larger, more representative populations are necessary to confirm these findings to develop personalized pain management strategies that mitigate risks of opioids. its This article may discuss unlabeled or inves- tigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combina- tions—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioids often are used in post-acute care (PAC) settings, although there is a lack of evidence of sustained pain reduction and improved function. There are subgroups of individuals whose pain does not respond well to opioids yet report these agents as highly beneficial. We aimed to classify opioid responsiveness among veterans residing in a US Department of Veterans Affairs community living center PAC unit. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study used barcode medication administration data followed by retrospective chart review. We determined opioid responsiveness along a continuum during 4 nonconsecutive days in 2016 and 2017. We defined opioid responsiveness as the mean change in pre- and postopioid pain ratings using the 0 to 10 scale over the 24-hour observation period (ie, mean ∆ score). The chart review identified correlates of opioid responsiveness adjusting for mean pre-opioid pain ratings. Results: Among the 41 residents who received opioids for at least moderate pain (≥ 4 of 10), the average response was highly variable (range, 0.5 - 6.3). Response did not correlate with demographic variables, indication for admission, or medical comorbidities, including cancer diagnosis. The presence of any psychiatric diagnosis ( P = .03), pain service consult ( P = .03), and higher opioid dosage ( P = .002) was significantly associated with poorer response. Conclusions: This pilot study classified opioid response on a continuum using a scalable administrative data source. Despite receiving higher dosages and more specialist consultations, some veterans’ pain responds poorly to opioids. Psychiatric comorbidity seems to increase this risk. Future studies in larger, more representative populations are necessary to confirm these findings to develop personalized pain management strategies that mitigate risks of opioids. its This article may discuss unlabeled or inves- tigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combina- tions—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.
老年退伍军人急性后阿片类药物反应的特征
背景:阿片类药物经常用于急性后护理(PAC)环境,尽管缺乏持续减轻疼痛和改善功能的证据。有些个体对阿片类药物的疼痛反应不佳,但报告这些药物非常有益。我们的目的是对居住在美国退伍军人事务部社区生活中心PAC单元的退伍军人的阿片类药物反应性进行分类。方法:本观察性横断面研究采用条形码给药数据,并进行回顾性图表回顾。我们在2016年和2017年连续测定了4天的阿片类药物反应性。我们将阿片类药物反应性定义为在24小时观察期内使用0到10分制的阿片类药物前和阿片类药物后疼痛评分的平均变化(即平均∆评分)。图表回顾确定了阿片类药物反应性调整平均阿片类药物前疼痛评分的相关性。结果:在41名接受阿片类药物治疗至少中度疼痛的居民(≥4 / 10)中,平均反应变化很大(范围为0.5 - 6.3)。反应与人口统计学变量、入院指征或医学合并症(包括癌症诊断)无关。任何精神科诊断(P = .03)、疼痛服务咨询(P = .03)和较高阿片类药物剂量(P = .002)的存在与较差的反应显著相关。结论:这项试点研究使用可扩展的管理数据源对阿片类药物反应进行连续分类。尽管接受了更高的剂量和更多的专家咨询,但一些退伍军人对阿片类药物的疼痛反应不佳。精神疾病似乎增加了这种风险。未来有必要在更大、更有代表性的人群中进行研究,以证实这些发现,从而制定个性化的疼痛管理策略,减轻阿片类药物的风险。本文可能讨论某些药物的未标记或研究用途。在给患者进行药物治疗之前,请查看特定药物或药物组合的完整处方信息,包括适应症、禁忌症、警告和不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信