The Biomarker Utility in Risk Stratification in an Ambulatory Heart Failure: ST2 or Galectin-3?

A. Berezin
{"title":"The Biomarker Utility in Risk Stratification in an Ambulatory Heart Failure: ST2 or Galectin-3?","authors":"A. Berezin","doi":"10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2015.03.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heart failure (HF) is multi factorial syndrome with high cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality rates associated with an increasingly prevalence worldwide. Measuring plasma levels of cardiac biomarkers may assist in prognostication of HF. However, the role of biomarker models in prediction of death and re-admission in ambulatory HF patients is not still understood. This editorial comment explores the knowledge regarding head-to-head comparison of galectin-3 and ST2 in risk stratification among ambulatory HF individuals. The comment is indicated sST2 and galectin-3 are recommended as alternate biomarkers with defined predictive value in HF and in generally patient population at high risk of HF manifestation. Recent clinical studies do not allow solving whether sST2 is superior then galectin-3 in ambulatory patient with stable HF because the received results are not obvious, although sST2 appears to be more attractive. Probably, more investigations are required to explain the role of each alternate biomarker in HF prognostication.","PeriodicalId":92802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","volume":"71 1","pages":"492-494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2015.03.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is multi factorial syndrome with high cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality rates associated with an increasingly prevalence worldwide. Measuring plasma levels of cardiac biomarkers may assist in prognostication of HF. However, the role of biomarker models in prediction of death and re-admission in ambulatory HF patients is not still understood. This editorial comment explores the knowledge regarding head-to-head comparison of galectin-3 and ST2 in risk stratification among ambulatory HF individuals. The comment is indicated sST2 and galectin-3 are recommended as alternate biomarkers with defined predictive value in HF and in generally patient population at high risk of HF manifestation. Recent clinical studies do not allow solving whether sST2 is superior then galectin-3 in ambulatory patient with stable HF because the received results are not obvious, although sST2 appears to be more attractive. Probably, more investigations are required to explain the role of each alternate biomarker in HF prognostication.
生物标志物在动态心衰风险分层中的应用:ST2还是半凝集素-3?
心力衰竭(HF)是一种多因素综合征,具有高心血管(CV)发病率和死亡率,在世界范围内日益流行。测量心脏生物标志物的血浆水平可能有助于心衰的预测。然而,生物标志物模型在预测非住院HF患者死亡和再入院中的作用尚不清楚。这篇社论评论探讨了关于半乳糖凝集素-3和ST2在流动心衰患者风险分层中的头对头比较的知识。该评论指出,推荐sST2和半乳糖凝集素-3作为替代生物标志物,在心衰和一般心衰高危患者人群中具有明确的预测价值。最近的临床研究还不能确定sST2在稳定型心衰的门诊患者中是否优于半凝集素-3,因为收到的结果并不明显,尽管sST2似乎更有吸引力。可能需要更多的研究来解释每种替代生物标志物在心衰预后中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信