Rating Level as a Method to Assess the Impact of Speech Noise on Cognitive Performance and Annoyance in Offices

Q1 Arts and Humanities
T. Renz, P. Leistner, Andreas Liebl
{"title":"Rating Level as a Method to Assess the Impact of Speech Noise on Cognitive Performance and Annoyance in Offices","authors":"T. Renz, P. Leistner, Andreas Liebl","doi":"10.3813/aaa.919390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Germany, the rating level is an important parameter to assess noise immissions in occupied offices. The rating level denotes the energy-equivalent sound pressure level during a measurement period with speech sounds and considers penalties for tonal, informational and impulsive constituents.\n There is little evidence that the rating level correlates with the performance and perceived annoyance of office workers. This study evaluates 89 different sound conditions under which subjects have to complete a short-term memory task and a questionnaire in laboratory conditions with respect\n to their relationships with the rating level. The relationships of the penalty for impulsiveness and the penalty for tonality or informational constituents with the rating level are analyzed separately. In addition, the penalty for tonality or informational constituents is substituted by percentile\n level statistics, namely the difference between the 10th and 90th percentile levels. In contrast to the penalty for tonality or informational constituents, this metric is objectively measurable. Using the rating level to assess the noise at office workplaces could be\n improved by using percentile level statistics to account for informational constituents. To improve the predictive validity, it is suggested to report the penalties separately.","PeriodicalId":35085,"journal":{"name":"Acta Acustica united with Acustica","volume":"7 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Acustica united with Acustica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3813/aaa.919390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Germany, the rating level is an important parameter to assess noise immissions in occupied offices. The rating level denotes the energy-equivalent sound pressure level during a measurement period with speech sounds and considers penalties for tonal, informational and impulsive constituents. There is little evidence that the rating level correlates with the performance and perceived annoyance of office workers. This study evaluates 89 different sound conditions under which subjects have to complete a short-term memory task and a questionnaire in laboratory conditions with respect to their relationships with the rating level. The relationships of the penalty for impulsiveness and the penalty for tonality or informational constituents with the rating level are analyzed separately. In addition, the penalty for tonality or informational constituents is substituted by percentile level statistics, namely the difference between the 10th and 90th percentile levels. In contrast to the penalty for tonality or informational constituents, this metric is objectively measurable. Using the rating level to assess the noise at office workplaces could be improved by using percentile level statistics to account for informational constituents. To improve the predictive validity, it is suggested to report the penalties separately.
评价语音噪音对办公室认知表现和烦恼影响的等级方法
在德国,等级等级是评估被占用办公室噪音排放的重要参数。评级等级表示在语音测量期间的能量等效声压级,并考虑音调,信息和脉冲成分的惩罚。几乎没有证据表明评级水平与办公室工作人员的表现和感知烦恼有关。本研究评估了89种不同的声音条件下,受试者必须在实验室条件下完成短期记忆任务和问卷调查,以了解他们与评级水平的关系。分别分析了冲动惩罚、调性惩罚和信息成分惩罚与评分水平的关系。此外,音调或信息成分的惩罚被百分位水平统计所取代,即第10和第90百分位水平之间的差异。与音调或信息成分的惩罚相反,这个度量是客观可测量的。使用评级水平来评估办公室工作场所的噪音可以通过使用百分位水平统计来说明信息成分来改进。为了提高预测的效度,建议将处罚分开报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: Cessation. Acta Acustica united with Acustica (Acta Acust united Ac), was published together with the European Acoustics Association (EAA). It was an international, peer-reviewed journal on acoustics. It published original articles on all subjects in the field of acoustics, such as • General Linear Acoustics, • Nonlinear Acoustics, Macrosonics, • Aeroacoustics, • Atmospheric Sound, • Underwater Sound, • Ultrasonics, • Physical Acoustics, • Structural Acoustics, • Noise Control, • Active Control, • Environmental Noise, • Building Acoustics, • Room Acoustics, • Acoustic Materials and Metamaterials, • Audio Signal Processing and Transducers, • Computational and Numerical Acoustics, • Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics, • Speech, • Musical Acoustics, • Virtual Acoustics, • Auditory Quality of Systems, • Animal Bioacoustics, • History of Acoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信