Profesionalismo: valores y competencias en formación sanitaria especializada

N. Giménez , J. Alcaraz , M. Gavagnach , R. Kazan , A. Arévalo , M. Rodríguez-Carballeira
{"title":"Profesionalismo: valores y competencias en formación sanitaria especializada","authors":"N. Giménez ,&nbsp;J. Alcaraz ,&nbsp;M. Gavagnach ,&nbsp;R. Kazan ,&nbsp;A. Arévalo ,&nbsp;M. Rodríguez-Carballeira","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the perception of healthcare professionals (tutors, residents and teaching collaborators) involved in specialist medical training on the core values and skills to develop their tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A tailor-made questionnaire aimed at healthcare professionals in 9<!--> <!-->health care centres and a referral hospital. Questionnaire: 4 sections and 51 variables (scale 1-10).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 287 professionals participated, which included 97% tutors (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->59), 38% residents (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->61), and 56% others (97 teaching collaborators and 70 not associated with teaching). The alfa Cronbach coefficient was 0.945. Best rated values were work compliance (8.7 points), ethics in professional practice (8.6 points), and respect for their team (8.3 points). The best rated competence was communication with patients and families (8.1 points), followed by self-motivating leadership (7.9 points), and the practical application of medical and healthcare theoretical knowledge (7.8 points). The values received, on average, 0.7 points above competences (95% <span>CI</span>: 0.5-0.9). There were no differences between tutors and residents, although differences were found between doctors and nurses, and between males and females.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most of the professionals (tutors, residents, and teaching collaborators) share the same perception of the values and competencies that influence their professional development. This perception was influenced by the professional category and gender, but not age or working in a hospital or primary health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 226-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.11.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16301701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

To determine the perception of healthcare professionals (tutors, residents and teaching collaborators) involved in specialist medical training on the core values and skills to develop their tasks.

Methods

A tailor-made questionnaire aimed at healthcare professionals in 9 health care centres and a referral hospital. Questionnaire: 4 sections and 51 variables (scale 1-10).

Results

A total of 287 professionals participated, which included 97% tutors (n = 59), 38% residents (n = 61), and 56% others (97 teaching collaborators and 70 not associated with teaching). The alfa Cronbach coefficient was 0.945. Best rated values were work compliance (8.7 points), ethics in professional practice (8.6 points), and respect for their team (8.3 points). The best rated competence was communication with patients and families (8.1 points), followed by self-motivating leadership (7.9 points), and the practical application of medical and healthcare theoretical knowledge (7.8 points). The values received, on average, 0.7 points above competences (95% CI: 0.5-0.9). There were no differences between tutors and residents, although differences were found between doctors and nurses, and between males and females.

Conclusion

Most of the professionals (tutors, residents, and teaching collaborators) share the same perception of the values and competencies that influence their professional development. This perception was influenced by the professional category and gender, but not age or working in a hospital or primary health care.

专业精神:专业卫生培训的价值观和能力
目的了解参与专科医学培训的医疗专业人员(导师、住院医师和教学合作者)对核心价值观和技能的认知,以发展其任务。方法针对9个卫生保健中心和1家转诊医院的卫生保健专业人员进行定制问卷调查。问卷:4部分,51个变量(量表1-10)。结果共287名专业人员参与调查,其中导师占97% (n = 59),住院医师占38% (n = 61),其他人员占56%(教学合作者97人,非教学人员70人)。α - Cronbach系数为0.945。得分最高的价值观是工作合规(8.7分)、职业道德(8.6分)和对团队的尊重(8.3分)。得分最高的能力是与病人和家属沟通(8.1分),其次是自我激励的领导能力(7.9分),以及实际应用医疗保健理论知识(7.8分)。这些值平均高出能力0.7分(95% CI: 0.5-0.9)。尽管医生和护士、男性和女性之间存在差异,但家庭教师和住院医生之间没有差异。大多数专业人员(导师、住院医师和教学合作者)对影响其专业发展的价值观和能力有着相同的看法。这种看法受专业类别和性别的影响,但不受年龄或在医院或初级保健机构工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信