Response to “Standardization of osteopathic manipulative treatment in telehealth settings to maximize patient outcomes and minimize adverse effects”

Joanna L. Kramer, Kathleen de Asis
{"title":"Response to “Standardization of osteopathic manipulative treatment in telehealth settings to maximize patient outcomes and minimize adverse effects”","authors":"Joanna L. Kramer, Kathleen de Asis","doi":"10.1515/jom-2022-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We appreciate the authors’ interest [1] and enthusiasm for osteopathic interventions via telehealth and agree with their call for standardized guidelines to help improve the delivery of virtual osteopathic care. When these visits began [2], we were pivoting quickly from in-person to telehealth visits and trying to determine if osteopathic interventions via telehealth would be feasible. Given our early results, we absolutely recognize the need for more study of standardization and quality tools to assist patients and families with such visits. This need is highlighted by a systematic review conducted by Mani et al. [3] which revealed discrepancies in validity for certain musculoskeletal assessments conducted over telehealth. Cottrell and Russell [4] suggest several considerations for standardizing musculoskeletal therapy via telehealth including the use of frameworks and theories, clinical factors like physical location, clinician skill and experience, and systematic evaluations of the treatments. The study and development of such standardized protocols could allow for a better understanding of the efficacy of osteopathic interventions for specific musculoskeletal complaints. Additionally, consistent methods would lead to broader and safer application of osteopathic principles through a telehealth platform. We would be eager to collaborate in the future with any osteopathic leaders who might be interested in developing these tools.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"119 1","pages":"379 - 379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2022-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We appreciate the authors’ interest [1] and enthusiasm for osteopathic interventions via telehealth and agree with their call for standardized guidelines to help improve the delivery of virtual osteopathic care. When these visits began [2], we were pivoting quickly from in-person to telehealth visits and trying to determine if osteopathic interventions via telehealth would be feasible. Given our early results, we absolutely recognize the need for more study of standardization and quality tools to assist patients and families with such visits. This need is highlighted by a systematic review conducted by Mani et al. [3] which revealed discrepancies in validity for certain musculoskeletal assessments conducted over telehealth. Cottrell and Russell [4] suggest several considerations for standardizing musculoskeletal therapy via telehealth including the use of frameworks and theories, clinical factors like physical location, clinician skill and experience, and systematic evaluations of the treatments. The study and development of such standardized protocols could allow for a better understanding of the efficacy of osteopathic interventions for specific musculoskeletal complaints. Additionally, consistent methods would lead to broader and safer application of osteopathic principles through a telehealth platform. We would be eager to collaborate in the future with any osteopathic leaders who might be interested in developing these tools.
对“远程医疗环境中骨科手法治疗标准化以最大限度提高患者疗效和减少不良反应”的回应
我们赞赏作者对通过远程医疗进行整骨疗法干预的兴趣[1]和热情,并同意他们对标准化指南的呼吁,以帮助改善虚拟整骨疗法的提供。当这些访问开始[2]时,我们迅速从面对面访问转向远程医疗访问,并试图确定通过远程医疗进行整骨疗法干预是否可行。鉴于我们的早期结果,我们绝对认识到有必要对标准化和质量工具进行更多的研究,以帮助患者和家庭进行此类访问。Mani等人进行的一项系统综述强调了这一需求[3],该综述揭示了远程医疗中某些肌肉骨骼评估的有效性差异。Cottrell和Russell[4]提出了通过远程医疗标准化肌肉骨骼治疗的几个考虑因素,包括框架和理论的使用、物理位置等临床因素、临床医生的技能和经验,以及对治疗的系统评估。这种标准化方案的研究和发展可以让我们更好地了解骨科干预对特定肌肉骨骼疾病的疗效。此外,一致的方法将导致通过远程医疗平台更广泛和更安全地应用整骨疗法原理。我们渴望在未来与任何可能对开发这些工具感兴趣的整骨疗法领导者合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信