Hospitalizations for Acute Gout: Process Mapping the Inpatient Journey and Identifying Predictors of Admission

Q2 Medicine
M. Russell, D. Nagra, Benjamin D. Clarke, Sathiyaa Balachandran, April Buazon, Amy Boalch, K. Bechman, M. Adas, E. Alveyn, A. Rutherford, J. Galloway
{"title":"Hospitalizations for Acute Gout: Process Mapping the Inpatient Journey and Identifying Predictors of Admission","authors":"M. Russell, D. Nagra, Benjamin D. Clarke, Sathiyaa Balachandran, April Buazon, Amy Boalch, K. Bechman, M. Adas, E. Alveyn, A. Rutherford, J. Galloway","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.211203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To identify predictors of admission following emergency department (ED) attendances for gout flares and to describe barriers to optimal inpatient gout care. Methods. ED attendances and hospital admissions with primary diagnoses of gout were analyzed at 2 UK-based hospitals between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. Demographic and clinical predictors of ED disposition (admission or discharge) and reattendance for gout flares were identified using logistic regression and survival models, respectively. Case note reviews (n = 59), stakeholder meetings, and process mapping were performed to capture detailed information on gout management and to identify strategies to optimize care. Results. Of 1220 emergency attendances for gout flares, 23.5% required hospitalization (median length of stay: 3.6 days). Recurrent attendances for flares occurred in 10.4% of patients during the study period. In multivariate logistic regression models, significant predictors of admission from ED were older age, overnight ED arrival time, higher serum urate (SU), higher C-reactive protein, and higher total white cell count at presentation. Detailed case note reviews showed that only 22.6% of patients with preexisting gout were receiving urate-lowering therapy (ULT) at presentation. Initial diagnostic uncertainty was common, yet rheumatology input and synovial aspirates were rarely obtained. By 6 months postdischarge, 43.6% were receiving ULT; however, few patients had treat-to-target dose optimization, and only 9.1% achieved SU levels ≤ 360 μmol/L. Conclusion. We identified multiple predictors of hospitalization for acute gout. Treat-to-target optimization of ULT following hospitalization remains inadequate and must be improved if admissions are to be prevented.","PeriodicalId":35278,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective. To identify predictors of admission following emergency department (ED) attendances for gout flares and to describe barriers to optimal inpatient gout care. Methods. ED attendances and hospital admissions with primary diagnoses of gout were analyzed at 2 UK-based hospitals between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. Demographic and clinical predictors of ED disposition (admission or discharge) and reattendance for gout flares were identified using logistic regression and survival models, respectively. Case note reviews (n = 59), stakeholder meetings, and process mapping were performed to capture detailed information on gout management and to identify strategies to optimize care. Results. Of 1220 emergency attendances for gout flares, 23.5% required hospitalization (median length of stay: 3.6 days). Recurrent attendances for flares occurred in 10.4% of patients during the study period. In multivariate logistic regression models, significant predictors of admission from ED were older age, overnight ED arrival time, higher serum urate (SU), higher C-reactive protein, and higher total white cell count at presentation. Detailed case note reviews showed that only 22.6% of patients with preexisting gout were receiving urate-lowering therapy (ULT) at presentation. Initial diagnostic uncertainty was common, yet rheumatology input and synovial aspirates were rarely obtained. By 6 months postdischarge, 43.6% were receiving ULT; however, few patients had treat-to-target dose optimization, and only 9.1% achieved SU levels ≤ 360 μmol/L. Conclusion. We identified multiple predictors of hospitalization for acute gout. Treat-to-target optimization of ULT following hospitalization remains inadequate and must be improved if admissions are to be prevented.
急性痛风的住院治疗:绘制住院过程和确定入院预测因素
目标。确定急诊科(ED)出诊后因痛风发作入院的预测因素,并描述获得最佳住院痛风护理的障碍。方法。分析了2017年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间英国两家医院的急诊科就诊率和初步诊断为痛风的住院率。分别使用logistic回归和生存模型确定ED处置(入院或出院)和痛风复发的人口学和临床预测因子。进行病例记录回顾(n = 59)、利益相关者会议和流程映射,以获取痛风管理的详细信息,并确定优化护理的策略。结果。在因痛风发作而急诊就诊的1220人中,23.5%需要住院治疗(住院时间中位数:3.6天)。在研究期间,有10.4%的患者因耀斑复发。在多变量logistic回归模型中,ED入院的显著预测因素是年龄较大、ED到达时间较晚、较高的血清尿酸(SU)、较高的c反应蛋白和就诊时较高的总白细胞计数。详细的病例记录回顾显示,只有22.6%的既往存在的痛风患者在就诊时接受降尿酸治疗(ULT)。最初的诊断不确定是常见的,然而风湿病学输入和滑膜抽吸很少得到。出院后6个月,43.6%的患者接受ULT治疗;然而,很少有患者达到治疗目标剂量优化,只有9.1%的患者SU水平≤360 μmol/L。结论。我们确定了急性痛风住院治疗的多个预测因素。住院后治疗对目标的优化仍然不足,如果要防止住院,必须改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Duncan A. Gordon, The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 36 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信