Sedation during spinal anaesthesia : A comparison between Dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion.

K. Savant, H. Patel, V. Patel
{"title":"Sedation during spinal anaesthesia : A comparison between Dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion.","authors":"K. Savant, H. Patel, V. Patel","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V8I5.4183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and compare it with intravenous midazolam infusion during spinal anaesthesia (S/A) with regards to effect on psychomotor performance, memory and any side effect. Materials Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I to III, scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery under S/A. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each; randomization was done by computer generated random numbers. In Group D, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and In Group M, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg basal infusion for 10 min then S/A was given with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%). After achieving required level of S/A; position given and then infusion of inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg/hr in group D and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg/hr by infusion started. Both psychomotor and memory test were performed before study drug infusion and after 1 and 4 hour of stoppage of infusion. Results: Thus, in both the groups, psychomotor performance was not significantly changed as compared to baseline at 1 hour and 4 hour after stoppage of infusion. There was significantly decreased in recall of picture, after 1 hour of study drug infusion in both the groups (anterograde amnesia); which was regained at 1 hour after stoppage of infusion. The mean time required to achieved sedation score (RSS) of 3 were statistically significant shorter in group D as compared to in group M (P 0.05). Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that, Dexmedetomidine provide rapid onset of arousable sedation without causing respiratory and cardiovascular depression. It provides anterograde amnesia with rapid recovery of psychomotor function.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"147 1","pages":"228-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V8I5.4183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To study the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and compare it with intravenous midazolam infusion during spinal anaesthesia (S/A) with regards to effect on psychomotor performance, memory and any side effect. Materials Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I to III, scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery under S/A. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each; randomization was done by computer generated random numbers. In Group D, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and In Group M, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg basal infusion for 10 min then S/A was given with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%). After achieving required level of S/A; position given and then infusion of inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg/hr in group D and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg/hr by infusion started. Both psychomotor and memory test were performed before study drug infusion and after 1 and 4 hour of stoppage of infusion. Results: Thus, in both the groups, psychomotor performance was not significantly changed as compared to baseline at 1 hour and 4 hour after stoppage of infusion. There was significantly decreased in recall of picture, after 1 hour of study drug infusion in both the groups (anterograde amnesia); which was regained at 1 hour after stoppage of infusion. The mean time required to achieved sedation score (RSS) of 3 were statistically significant shorter in group D as compared to in group M (P 0.05). Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that, Dexmedetomidine provide rapid onset of arousable sedation without causing respiratory and cardiovascular depression. It provides anterograde amnesia with rapid recovery of psychomotor function.
脊髓麻醉中的镇静作用:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑输注的比较。
目的:探讨右美托咪定与咪达唑仑在脊髓麻醉(S/A)过程中对精神运动表现、记忆的影响及不良反应。方法:采用前瞻性随机双盲研究,对60例ASA I ~ III级患者进行S/A下腹部或下肢手术。所有患者随机分为两组,每组30人;随机化是由计算机生成的随机数完成的。D组右美托咪定1 μg/kg, M组咪达唑仑0.04 mg/kg基础静脉滴注10 min后加0.5%布比卡因高压S/A。在达到要求的S/A水平后;给予体位,注射。右美托咪定0.5µg/kg/hr, D组和注射组。开始滴注咪达唑仑0.04mg/kg/hr。在研究药物输注前、停药1小时、停药4小时分别进行精神运动和记忆测试。结果:因此,两组在停止输注后1小时和4小时的精神运动表现与基线相比没有显著变化。研究药物输注1小时后,两组患者对图片的回忆能力均显著下降(顺行性遗忘);停药后1小时恢复。D组达到镇静评分(RSS) 3分的平均所需时间较M组短,差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。结论:右美托咪定提供快速起效的可唤醒镇静,而不引起呼吸和心血管抑制。它提供了顺行性健忘症与快速恢复精神运动功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信