Evaluation of Current ASTM Standards for ASR Prevention When Fine Lightweight Aggregates Are Used

IF 1.4 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chang Li, J. Ideker, M. Thomas
{"title":"Evaluation of Current ASTM Standards for ASR Prevention When Fine Lightweight Aggregates Are Used","authors":"Chang Li, J. Ideker, M. Thomas","doi":"10.1520/acem20200076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has shown that using fine lightweight aggregate (FLWA) can be a promising strategy to mitigate alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in mortar and concrete. However, limited studies focused on assessing current ASTM standards for their applicability in evaluating the efficacy of ASR mitigation using FLWAs. In this study, three commercially used FLWAs (expanded shale, clay, and slate) were investigated in mortar and concrete mixtures with reactive aggregates of different levels of reactivity. ASTM test methods, including ASTM C289-07, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates (Chemical Method) (Withdrawn 2016); ASTM C1260-14, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method) (Superseded); and ASTM C1293-18, Standard Test Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete due to Alkali-Silica Reaction (Superseded), were completed. Fine normal-weight aggregates were replaced by the FLWA at 25 % and 50 % by volume in the concrete mixtures, and 25 %, 50 %, and 100 % in mortar mixtures. Results showed that ASTM C1260-14 and ASTM C1293-18 can be used to evaluate the mitigation efficacy when pre-wetted FLWAs were used. The ASTM C289-07 test is not a reliable test method to study the reactivity of the FLWAs, but the results can be used to indicate the alkali-consuming ability of the FLWAs. All three FLWAs were effective in reducing ASR-induced expansion in both ASTM C1260-14 and ASTM C1293-18. The investigated FLWAs were especially effective in the concrete when moderately reactive aggregates, as classified by ASTM C1778-14, Standard Guide for Reducing the Risk of Deleterious Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete (Superseded), were used. For concrete with a highly reactive aggregate or very highly reactive aggregate, other mitigation strategies may need to be combined with FLWAs to effectively mitigate ASR.","PeriodicalId":51766,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil Engineering Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil Engineering Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/acem20200076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previous research has shown that using fine lightweight aggregate (FLWA) can be a promising strategy to mitigate alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in mortar and concrete. However, limited studies focused on assessing current ASTM standards for their applicability in evaluating the efficacy of ASR mitigation using FLWAs. In this study, three commercially used FLWAs (expanded shale, clay, and slate) were investigated in mortar and concrete mixtures with reactive aggregates of different levels of reactivity. ASTM test methods, including ASTM C289-07, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates (Chemical Method) (Withdrawn 2016); ASTM C1260-14, Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method) (Superseded); and ASTM C1293-18, Standard Test Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete due to Alkali-Silica Reaction (Superseded), were completed. Fine normal-weight aggregates were replaced by the FLWA at 25 % and 50 % by volume in the concrete mixtures, and 25 %, 50 %, and 100 % in mortar mixtures. Results showed that ASTM C1260-14 and ASTM C1293-18 can be used to evaluate the mitigation efficacy when pre-wetted FLWAs were used. The ASTM C289-07 test is not a reliable test method to study the reactivity of the FLWAs, but the results can be used to indicate the alkali-consuming ability of the FLWAs. All three FLWAs were effective in reducing ASR-induced expansion in both ASTM C1260-14 and ASTM C1293-18. The investigated FLWAs were especially effective in the concrete when moderately reactive aggregates, as classified by ASTM C1778-14, Standard Guide for Reducing the Risk of Deleterious Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete (Superseded), were used. For concrete with a highly reactive aggregate or very highly reactive aggregate, other mitigation strategies may need to be combined with FLWAs to effectively mitigate ASR.
评估使用轻质细骨料时防止ASR的现行ASTM标准
先前的研究表明,使用轻质细骨料(FLWA)可能是缓解砂浆和混凝土中碱-硅反应(ASR)的一种很有前途的策略。然而,有限的研究侧重于评估现行ASTM标准在评估使用FLWAs缓解ASR的有效性方面的适用性。在这项研究中,研究了三种商用FLWAs(膨胀页岩,粘土和板岩)在砂浆和混凝土混合物中具有不同反应性水平的活性骨料。ASTM试验方法,包括ASTM C289-07,集料潜在碱-硅反应性的标准试验方法(化学方法)(2016年撤回);ASTM C1260-14集料潜在碱反应性的标准试验方法(砂浆棒法)(已取代);和ASTM C1293-18《测定碱-硅反应引起的混凝土长度变化的标准试验方法(已取代)》完成。细骨料在混凝土混合物中以25%和50%的体积取代,在砂浆混合物中以25%、50%和100%的体积取代。结果表明,ASTM C1260-14和ASTM C1293-18可用于评价预湿flwa的减缓效果。ASTM C289-07试验不是研究FLWAs反应性的可靠试验方法,但其结果可用于指示FLWAs的耐碱能力。在ASTM C1260-14和ASTM C1293-18中,所有三种FLWAs都能有效减少asr引起的膨胀。当使用ASTM C1778-14《降低混凝土中有害碱-骨料反应风险的标准指南(已取代)》中分类的中度活性骨料时,所研究的FLWAs在混凝土中特别有效。对于具有高反应性骨料或非常高反应性骨料的混凝土,可能需要将其他缓解策略与flwa相结合,以有效减轻ASR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Civil Engineering Materials
Advances in Civil Engineering Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The journal is published continuously in one annual issue online. Papers are published online as they are approved and edited. Special Issues may also be published on specific topics of interest to our readers. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials provides high-quality, papers on a broad range of topics relating to the properties and performance of civil engineering materials. Materials Covered: (but not limited to) Concrete, Asphalt, Steel, Polymers and polymeric composites, Wood, Other materials used in civil engineering applications (for example, pavements, bridges, and buildings, including nonstructural building elements such as insulation and roofing), and environmental systems (including water treatment). Core Topics Covered: Characterization, such as chemical composition, nanostructure, and microstructure, Physical properties, such as strength, stiffness, and fracture behavior, Constructability, such as construction methods, quality control/assurance, life cycle analysis, and sustainability, Durability. Papers may present experimental or modeling studies based on laboratory or field observations. Papers relating to sustainability of engineering materials or to the impact of materials on sustainability of engineering structures are especially encouraged.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信