The Nagoya Protocol and Access and Benefit Sharing regulations of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and its impacts on botanic gardens' collections and research.

Q1 Veterinary
Michael Kiehn
{"title":"The Nagoya Protocol and Access and Benefit Sharing regulations of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and its impacts on botanic gardens' collections and research.","authors":"Michael Kiehn","doi":"10.1079/PAVSNNR202116034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n At its 10th meeting in 2010, the Conference of the Parties of the CBD adopted the 'Nagoya Protocol (NP) on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilisation' which entered into force on 12 October 2014. Currently, the NP has been adopted by 129 parties, including the EU. This article reviews information retrieved from a variety of different sources dealing with the implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) regulations, including the NP, for biological collections, especially regarding material accession, conservation and research in botanic gardens. Problems encountered with adhering to ABS regulations and the NP include the following: increasing bureaucratic and administrative burdens arising from the many different ABS-related regulations at the national level; difficulties in identifying and engaging with national authorities designated as competent signatories for the NP in user and provider countries; and problems arising from ambivalent and inconsistent use of terms in the NP and in national ABS legislation. The authors encourage parties to fulfil the CBD requirement for 'simplified measures on access for non-commercial research purposes' and point out that NP-related impediments to conservation (and fundamental research) will have negative impacts on human development and biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":39273,"journal":{"name":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR202116034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract At its 10th meeting in 2010, the Conference of the Parties of the CBD adopted the 'Nagoya Protocol (NP) on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilisation' which entered into force on 12 October 2014. Currently, the NP has been adopted by 129 parties, including the EU. This article reviews information retrieved from a variety of different sources dealing with the implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) regulations, including the NP, for biological collections, especially regarding material accession, conservation and research in botanic gardens. Problems encountered with adhering to ABS regulations and the NP include the following: increasing bureaucratic and administrative burdens arising from the many different ABS-related regulations at the national level; difficulties in identifying and engaging with national authorities designated as competent signatories for the NP in user and provider countries; and problems arising from ambivalent and inconsistent use of terms in the NP and in national ABS legislation. The authors encourage parties to fulfil the CBD requirement for 'simplified measures on access for non-commercial research purposes' and point out that NP-related impediments to conservation (and fundamental research) will have negative impacts on human development and biodiversity.
《生物多样性公约》《名古屋议定书》和《获取与惠益分享条例》及其对植物园采集与研究的影响。
在2010年第10次缔约方大会上,《生物多样性公约》缔约方大会通过了《关于获取遗传资源和公平公正分享利用遗传资源所产生惠益的名古屋议定书》,该议定书于2014年10月12日生效。目前,包括欧盟在内的129个政党都采用了国家党。本文综述了从各种不同来源检索到的信息,涉及包括NP在内的获取和利益分享(ABS)法规对生物收藏的影响,特别是关于植物园材料的获取、保护和研究。在遵守ABS法规和NP方面遇到的问题包括:由于国家一级许多不同的ABS相关法规而增加的官僚主义和行政负担;在使用者和提供者国家查明并与指定为NP主管签署国的国家当局接触方面存在困难;以及NP和国家ABS立法中术语使用的矛盾和不一致所产生的问题。这组作者鼓励缔约方履行《生物多样性公约》关于“非商业研究目的获取的简化措施”的要求,并指出与np相关的保护(和基础研究)障碍将对人类发展和生物多样性产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信